Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

revolving shackles w/ i.f.s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 07:03 PM
  #1  
weakyota91's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Redding C.A.
revolving shackles w/ i.f.s

anybody very familiar with the revolving shackles. do they really provide up to 10 inches of additional flex. For now I have ifs and it will be a while before i do a s.a.s Is it going to be a waste of money to put the revolving shackles in the rear since i am limited to my flex in the front. it seems to me that by getting way more flex out of the rear with ifs it is going to continue to tilt my whole body and increase my chances of rolling. true or false.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 08:21 PM
  #2  
Silver_Truck's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 0
From: B'ham, WA
Revolving shackles are interesting, they're extremely good on a ramp and thats about it, well maybe a dedicated trail rig that sees only slow speeds and rocks. Going up and down hills sucks as well as hitting the brakes because the rear unloads and the shackles extend, kinda a unnerving feeling. Also I don't know for sure but now with the chevies in the back they out flex my front by a large margin and although it feels tippy and you can get the body pretty far over I've only ever lifted a tire like 1 foot and that feels like it'll tip but it stays pretty planted. So it may increase the chance but you'll probably ลลลล yourself and back off before you flop.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 08:44 PM
  #3  
WATRD's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,089
Likes: 0
From: Duvall, WA
Keep in mind that the best set-up has a balance of similar amounts of flex between front and rear for stability. If you upset that balance by too much, you are asking for trouble.

With that said, EVERY rig I have ever seen with the Revolvers ended up pinning them so they wouldn't unload at just the wrong time.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 07:46 AM
  #4  
snap-on's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,419
Likes: 8
From: Peoria IL
Ive got a set sitting in the garage waiting to go on my truck. but

1) Teraflex doesnt build a version for 86-95 trucks only earlyer.
2) the rear frame mount has to be trimmed to fit the revolvers
3) I want to do a ubolt flip but dont have the parts
4) New longer shocks require both new upper and lower mounts
5) new upper mounts require fabbed up mount

as for stablity, I dont think they will make them be any more unstable. If anything it allows your rear tires to spend more time on the ground = more traction/better stablity.

most buggies in the rock crawing these days set up shocks for 2" uptravel and 10+ inches downward travel. meaning all the travel is droop, not a lot diffrent from revolvers and the added droop you gain.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 07:52 AM
  #5  
Intrepid's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,685
Likes: 1
From: Ashburnham, MA
Search around, specifically on Pirate, I have yet to see anyone that is terribly happy with them. Also, that much extra flex will require longer shocks, otherwise you will bottom them out. Pull your swaybar, that will give your front some flex. Get extended shackles for your rear and be happy with that. Maybe throw some chevies on there!
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:55 PM.