Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

Opinions on swapping to a 22RE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 10:23 AM
  #1  
amusement's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 0
From: Portland, Oregon
Opinions on swapping to a 22RE

I am brainstorming 3.0 to a 22RE engine swap. What I like to know is has anyone every done this?

Also, (and I know this is crazy), every heard of someone putting a 22RE in a Jeep (CJ5 or CJ7)?

Have not purchased either vehicle...just brainstorming this out before putting any money down.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 10:34 AM
  #2  
drew303's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,880
Likes: 2
From: Olympia, WA
Never heard of someone sticking one in a jeep. Maybe a 2f or 3f inline 6? but not the 22re..

Plenty have done the swap into Samurais tho =)


Most do a 3.0 -> 3.4 swap.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 11:17 AM
  #3  
harpen123's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Mooresville, NC but college at Auburn, AL
id say just make sure you get a hold of the ecu and the harness. and the wiring is going to probably be a chore. If u hate the 3.slow though it will likely be worth it.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 02:17 PM
  #4  
breknraj's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
From: Summit County, Colorado
If you already have the 3.0, it would be easier to swap in a 3.4. It would give you better power, drivability and milage. See my sig - it's what I did, and I'm VERY satisfied with it!

If you are determined to swap a 22re, you will not only need the engine and ECU, but a compatible transmission and transfer case, as well. Motor mounts will have to be redone, ect. You will have a stout little engine, but it will have less power than the 3.0.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2007 | 03:11 PM
  #5  
85yoda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
I have a 92 ex cab 4x4 with the 3.0 bad head gaskets. Wanted to do the same swap, i have everything to do it but I am going to use a carb motor.It would be way easier that way, just throw a weber on and go. If you do this swap before me post how it went or just IM me and let me know. good luck to ya.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2007 | 03:18 PM
  #6  
Stomis's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
From: Point Pleasant NJ
I posted about this earlier and everyone told me I was nuts for going to a smaller engine. I'm considering a 22re Turbo to make moderate horsepower with still good gas mileage. That 3.4 must get some damn good gas mileage to do better than a 22re. I thought a fresh 22re would take you 25mpg+ ? Gotta weigh the pricing too though: A 3.4 swap is an easy 4-5grand versus a 2-3grand 22re swap
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2007 | 03:26 PM
  #7  
dijlop's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 1
From: fl
yea well, my 22re at last check was gettin 20.6 mpg. thats with about equal highway and city, but u also gotta factor into that equation the fact that im a teen driver, soooo. but i have no idea what the 3.4 gets with mpg. i believe its actually close to the same as im gettin. btw, my engine has less than 100 grand miles on it, but its a 94', so its old and sat a lot before i got it.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2007 | 03:34 PM
  #8  
CoedNaked's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
I think the 3.4 getting better mileage than a 3.0 is an honest farce.

For example I know what my buddy gets and I don't get THAT much worse gas mileage than him, maybe .5-1 MPG and I have a canopy, he doesn't (so say an extra 100-150 pounds there) and my truck also weighs about 400 pounds more than his, on top of the fact I have a 4.56 rear end, he has a 4.30 or 4.10 if I'm not mistaken.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2007 | 03:48 PM
  #9  
20005spd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: bristol, ri
i was getting 18-19 mpg with a heavy foot in my runner with 3.4 5spd, my old truck with 3.0 5spd...well lets just say not close.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2007 | 04:02 PM
  #10  
Stomis's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
From: Point Pleasant NJ
Yeah I know the 3.4 is better than the 3.0 but I thought someone said the 3.4 is better mpg than a good ol 22re.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2007 | 04:09 PM
  #11  
20005spd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: bristol, ri
ya i doubt that. my 22re got me great mpg but it was 2wd(alot less weight and parts to turn)
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2007 | 07:57 PM
  #12  
gametom's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: Manhattan IL
20.21mpg with raceing and 5k rpm Shifting 4runner 22re 4wd.
and i need a new 02
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2007 | 08:09 PM
  #13  
yotasavg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
From: Chico Republic, NOR*CAL
man i loved my old 2wd 22re. it was a zippy little thing and great millage too. if you're sick of lame millage with poor power, than i guess i'd be a good swap. i personally love the sound of my v6 and i wouldn't ditch it for anything less than a v8. that's just me tho, i like to stand by what i've got!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mskalmus
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
9
May 28, 2017 07:51 AM
tobylab
General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related)
6
Jan 18, 2016 07:06 PM
deepmarsh
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners
5
Aug 6, 2015 03:44 AM
tobylab
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
0
Jul 12, 2015 12:53 PM
A2theK
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
5
Jul 12, 2015 10:46 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:53 PM.