Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

Mileage..?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 01:37 PM
  #1  
de6w6it's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 462
Likes: 47
From: Lake Hiawatha, NJ
Mileage..?

I have an '88 22re 5 spd with 4.10's...wondering what average mileage to expect if I put on 31's ....what do you guys get if you have this setup? thanks for any info...
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 07:53 PM
  #2  
notanymore's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: Wenatchee WA
i just got 14 on my last trip with 410 and 31s. something is wrong and i have a cel right now but my motor isnt stock either. i would expect i should get like 18-19 highway with my truck but some people do get 21-22 but i dont know if thats with 31s
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 09:08 PM
  #3  
strykersd's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 569
Likes: 1
My 86 4runner with the 22re and 4.10 gears gets 22-24MPG with 31s. I'd say I do 25% on streets, 50% highway, and 25% offroad (4x4). But then again I drive like a grandma, shifting at anywhere from 2000-2500RPMs and cruising at 70mph on the freeway.

Last edited by strykersd; Nov 26, 2007 at 12:46 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 09:17 PM
  #4  
bob200587's Avatar
Contributing Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,546
Likes: 1
From: Nashville, TN
As earlier, My average is 17.76. Best 21, worst 14.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 10:48 PM
  #5  
stormin94's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,222
Likes: 4
From: Lake County, CA/Sacramento
You should expect 21-24MPG
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 11:11 PM
  #6  
bob200587's Avatar
Contributing Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,546
Likes: 1
From: Nashville, TN
Originally Posted by stormin94
You should expect 21-24MPG
Doubtful. They MIGHT get that stock, they rated them around that new, but those EPA estimates are usually pretty bad. With 31's and 4.10's those numbers are highly unlikely. Unless you drive really really lightly like the guy above mentioned (He didn't specify gears either). but it's my experience that to get the truck going and keep it moving takes a lot more than 2000-2500 rpms.

Conversely, a 2wd truck would probably get those numbers consistently.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 11:17 PM
  #7  
stormin94's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,222
Likes: 4
From: Lake County, CA/Sacramento
Well, with my 4Runner (details in sig) I get a pretty consistant 19 MPG with 31's and 4.30 gears. I think that a pickup would get a few MPG's better than a 4Runner, and the 22RE 4 cylender should get better MPG than a 3VZE. Plus, my dad's old 1993 Toyota Pickup 4X4 with 4.56 and 31's and 295,000m miles 5Speed used to get a very consistant 23 MPG. At worst it got 19, and at best, it was 25+MPG.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 11:35 PM
  #8  
bob200587's Avatar
Contributing Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,546
Likes: 1
From: Nashville, TN
Originally Posted by stormin94
Well, with my 4Runner (details in sig) I get a pretty consistant 19 MPG with 31's and 4.30 gears. I think that a pickup would get a few MPG's better than a 4Runner, and the 22RE 4 cylender should get better MPG than a 3VZE. Plus, my dad's old 1993 Toyota Pickup 4X4 with 4.56 and 31's and 295,000m miles 5Speed used to get a very consistant 23 MPG. At worst it got 19, and at best, it was 25+MPG.
It probably will get a little better than a 4runner. I've been recording my mileage for over 2 years now, and my average is 17.76 as of right now. I look forward to seeing an increase when I regear, although I may not because I'll probably do 4.88s for more low end.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 11:39 PM
  #9  
stormin94's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,222
Likes: 4
From: Lake County, CA/Sacramento
Extra torque is always good... but it depends on how much MPG you compromise, and what you use the rig for. I could go for some more torque, but I would also like more MPG's, but 19MPG for a 3.0 4Runner isn't all that bad. BTW, both mentioned rigs were/are driven on mostly highway, and little around town. Maybe that will help.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 11:45 PM
  #10  
infiltrator's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 3
From: Valencia, California
also, i feel like acceleration makes a big difference. how much do you stop and go. "city" here and "city" there make a diff. mine includes stop lights every 1/10th of a damn mile lol.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 11:51 PM
  #11  
stormin94's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,222
Likes: 4
From: Lake County, CA/Sacramento
That sucks. "City" driving around here is done mostly in a city of about 5,500 people, and mostly consists of slow speeds (like 20-35 miles per hour) and a few stop signs scattered around. Sometimes the "city" is Sacramento, and that doesn't help things much either. I've actually averaged better MPG in the city(Well, I timed every stoplight, and averaged about 45 MPH, and 18MPG) than on the freeway(stuck in stop and go traffic averaging 10-25MPH, and 10MPG)

BTW, I usually take off from stop signs/lights at half throttle, or more because I like to get moving, and through the intersections so that I don't get hit by any Illegals that might run the stop sign/lights.

Last edited by stormin94; Nov 25, 2007 at 11:53 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Doug S
03+ 4Runner/GX470, & 05+ Tacomas
2
Mar 15, 2015 09:59 PM
rcknrolfender79
Pre 84 Trucks
14
Dec 15, 2014 09:54 PM
hmongyota
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
7
Mar 26, 2012 07:04 PM
C C
Buying & Selling Advice - Feeler/Gauging Interest
1
May 19, 2011 09:07 PM
yota4life6
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
19
Feb 4, 2011 05:25 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:28 PM.