Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

Guess The MPG Gain!

Old Aug 1, 2006 | 12:54 PM
  #61  
4x4Lamm's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,550
Likes: 2
From: Canton, Ohio
I'm done. It feels so much smoother! The truck coasts a lot easier and such with the Warn hubs.

It will be a few days till I can get some MPG figures. Keep guessing.

Lamm
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 01:57 PM
  #62  
Carsonics's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
If you get more than 6MPG increase..Im doing the same to my 95 4x4....

How much was it to get all that done BTW?.

Thanks.
Mike

P.S. My guess is 5.325 mpg
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 02:03 PM
  #63  
4x4Lamm's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,550
Likes: 2
From: Canton, Ohio
Hubs were $140, all other parts were less than $200.

I did the work myself but it would be about $175 at a good shop to have it done.

Lamm
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 02:03 PM
  #64  
surf4runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,476
Likes: 1
From: so.cal
Originally Posted by Bumpin' Yota
And of course surf4runner had to screw it up with a 3.0xxxx instead of just saying 3.slow, I mean 3.0! LOL
your welcome

my guesstimate was calculated using the 3.slow
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 02:30 PM
  #65  
RunnerUp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Florida
5.7 mpg gain and also the new toyota v8 in the tundra displacement size
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 03:03 PM
  #66  
Bumpin' Yota's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,689
Likes: 4
From: Sarasota, FL
Originally Posted by RunnerUp
5.7 mpg gain and also the new toyota v8 in the tundra displacement size
huh? I thought the tundra used a 4.7L v8...
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 03:08 PM
  #67  
RunnerUp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Florida
yeah, the tundra does use a 4.7l v8, i geuss what i meant to say was the new, as in 07 tundra, will have an optional 5.7L v8
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 03:18 PM
  #68  
93Toyota PU's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Here goes nothing.... +2.467899
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 03:25 PM
  #69  
Bumpin' Yota's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,689
Likes: 4
From: Sarasota, FL
Originally Posted by RunnerUp
yeah, the tundra does use a 4.7l v8, i geuss what i meant to say was the new, as in 07 tundra, will have an optional 5.7L v8

oh cool, know any specs? Im hoping for a good 350hp!
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 03:40 PM
  #70  
jwbehm's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
3.4 mpg gain
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 04:24 PM
  #71  
TNRabbit's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 36
From: TENN Native Languishing in Virginia
Originally Posted by Bumpin' Yota
oh cool, know any specs? Im hoping for a good 350hp!
I believe I've seen figures approaching 400 hp!
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 05:08 PM
  #72  
86SR522REEFI's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 2
From: Durham, NC
2.2 haha lol
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 05:41 PM
  #73  
mt_goat's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 5
From: Oklahoma State
I'm sticking with -1 for the first tank, but I'll go with 0 for the 2nd tank. I have at one time or another done all those things to my truck and nothing changed with the fuel economy with any of them.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 05:41 PM
  #74  
ilikesoup's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: Indian River, MI
+7.034
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 06:01 PM
  #75  
tc's Avatar
tc
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 3
From: Longmont, CO
I'm guessing you'll report about 5MPG, but in actual fact, statistical analysis would show no difference at a 95% confidence interval due to the large standard deviation.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 08:14 PM
  #76  
4x4Lamm's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,550
Likes: 2
From: Canton, Ohio
Ouch! I should have stayed awake in match class, Troy!

I have been keeping track to a tenth of a mile at every fill-up since April so it should be interesting.

Lamm
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 09:30 PM
  #77  
Bumpin' Yota's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,689
Likes: 4
From: Sarasota, FL
ewww statistics! Get them away from me! lol
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 11:07 PM
  #78  
highway74's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
mileage

I say 3.15 increase. I did a fuel filter, lines and O2 sensor with maybe a 1 mpg gain at best on my 94 3.0 with ADD. I still need to do the rest on his list. I'm stuck between new Warns and used Aisins though.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 11:28 PM
  #79  
TNRabbit's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 36
From: TENN Native Languishing in Virginia
Originally Posted by highway74
I say 3.15 increase. I did a fuel filter, lines and O2 sensor with maybe a 1 mpg gain at best on my 94 3.0 with ADD. I still need to do the rest on his list. I'm stuck between new Warns and used Aisins though.
Hijack! FYI: http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ASIAN...spagenameZWD1V

This is for ONE hub...
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 11:32 PM
  #80  
BearsRunner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: socal
I'll say 7.2 mpg's. My runner gets 17 to 21 mpg's and I haven't done the electric fan mod yet or manual hubs. Both on my list of things needed.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:19 AM.