Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

Clutch opinions for 90 4runner

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 11:59 AM
  #21  
PirateFins's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 1
From: Smithsburg, Maryland
Why not send a PM to Strap22 and find out how much he can get the OEM Toyota stuff for you?

I put 140k on the first one, and am at 110k on the second, and I am not nice to my clutch.

Also do a search on here, I remember about a year or more ago someone here found out the name of the company that makes the OEM Toyota clutch sets and found them online for a less then the OEM prices.

Last edited by PirateFins; Apr 4, 2006 at 12:04 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 12:10 PM
  #22  
Snorkeldepth's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 591
Likes: 2
From: Orange County, California
One more vote for OEM. Back when I was replacing my clutch (at 180k) I was told that a heavy duty clutch might not be a good idea in light of suspect weaknesses in the 3VZE (bearings?). My OEM is doing fine.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 01:40 PM
  #23  
AH64ID's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,655
Likes: 0
From: Idaho
When I bought my 95 it had 89K on it, and the clutch was shot. So I put a DF in and was very pleased.

What about bearings? I am guessing toyota is best, but what else might be better?
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 02:37 PM
  #24  
Snorkeldepth's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 591
Likes: 2
From: Orange County, California
The concern was about the increase in force that would be transferred to the rear bearing of the engine with a stronger clutch. It was just a concern . . . . no proven theory. The idea was that it would be cheaper/easier to replace a clutch than a bearing in the engine. I'm no expert on this. That's what the transmission guys told me. They didn't care which clutch I put in.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 04:04 PM
  #25  
AH64ID's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,655
Likes: 0
From: Idaho
Sorry, I should have been more specific, I want to know what throw-out and pilot bearings are reccommended?
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 08:15 PM
  #26  
kyle_22r's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,981
Likes: 4
From: Lacey, WA
Originally Posted by Snorkeldepth
The concern was about the increase in force that would be transferred to the rear bearing of the engine with a stronger clutch. It was just a concern . . . . no proven theory. The idea was that it would be cheaper/easier to replace a clutch than a bearing in the engine. I'm no expert on this. That's what the transmission guys told me. They didn't care which clutch I put in.
these engines have seperate thrust washers on each side of the #3 main web. although there have been failures, mainly from extreme oil starvation or a clutch with no pedal freeplay(thus always putting thrust on the washers), they are rather uncommon.

i just installed another exedy clutch in my '91 pickup. the kit uses a nachi throwout bearing(same as toyota), and a disc with 4 springs. so far, it is a good clutch, i can't make the thing slip under power no matter what i do.

my only gripe with these, is that they don't quite have the pedal feel that the factory clutch has. it's very light, even though engagement is smooth and even all the way through pedal travel. it feels like the clutch in my dad's saturn. i don't really mind, but i'm one of those sickos that likes my left leg to hurt after going for a drive.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
smthwsn357
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
15
May 1, 2024 07:28 AM
mskalmus
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
9
May 28, 2017 07:51 AM
GreatLakesGuy
The Classifieds GraveYard
8
Sep 4, 2015 09:27 AM
A2theK
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
5
Jul 12, 2015 10:46 AM
Kalihi,HI
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
3
Jul 9, 2015 04:29 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:18 PM.