Burnt Piston Piston size
#1
Burnt Piston Piston size
I have a 94 pickup with a LC engineering 22re w/ 40k miles. Bought it off a buddy a while ago.
Problem #1. I pulled the head off beacuse I found antifreeze in my oil.
Problem #2 SO inspecting the block I found the #1 piston had a 3/4" long piece missing on the outside. I could see the ring easily. Lots of carbon build up on piston and head. Very light scoring or cylinder. Now someone told be that piston might of burned up from too much fuel being dumped into #1 cylinder or timing advance to far.
Now measureing the piston i removed it is 3.683 or 93.54mm. Stock is 92mm right? So mine is bored over .060? I havent miced my cylinder yet but will today.
Got some work to do....
Problem #1. I pulled the head off beacuse I found antifreeze in my oil.
Problem #2 SO inspecting the block I found the #1 piston had a 3/4" long piece missing on the outside. I could see the ring easily. Lots of carbon build up on piston and head. Very light scoring or cylinder. Now someone told be that piston might of burned up from too much fuel being dumped into #1 cylinder or timing advance to far.
Now measureing the piston i removed it is 3.683 or 93.54mm. Stock is 92mm right? So mine is bored over .060? I havent miced my cylinder yet but will today.
Got some work to do....
#3
94mm = 3.7007894", so no, it couldn't be. 3.683" = 93.5482mm, so 93.55mm is closer to what it really is(which it isn't). LCE calls them 94mm forged pistons...but they're not really though(obviously).
And it's also bored atleast .061"(1.5494mm) over. Stock is 92mm(3.6220492") + .061"(1.5494mm) = 3.683"(93.5482mm). But if you leave room for piston to cylinder clearance the bore should be ~3.684"(93.5736mm), so it's probably closer to bored .062"(1.5748mm) over in reality.
The engine is supposedly a 2.5L according LCE. But if the bore is 3.684"(93.5736mm) x 3.5039389"(89mm) stroke = 149.39698547055744 CID = 2449.1309093534004 cc = ~2.45L
Oh you want to know why the piston blew up, that I don't know. Might have something to do with the design, or install process, of the pistons. Seen something like it happen not too long ago with somebody's Keith Black pistons. I'd atleast want to know who makes these pistons myself.
EDIT: Displacement calculation revisions: bore & stroke = 3.687"(93.6498mm) x 3.5039389"(89mm) = 149.77279322747282 CID = 2455.2916922536528 cc = ~2.46L
And it's also bored atleast .061"(1.5494mm) over. Stock is 92mm(3.6220492") + .061"(1.5494mm) = 3.683"(93.5482mm). But if you leave room for piston to cylinder clearance the bore should be ~3.684"(93.5736mm), so it's probably closer to bored .062"(1.5748mm) over in reality.
The engine is supposedly a 2.5L according LCE. But if the bore is 3.684"(93.5736mm) x 3.5039389"(89mm) stroke = 149.39698547055744 CID = 2449.1309093534004 cc = ~2.45L
Oh you want to know why the piston blew up, that I don't know. Might have something to do with the design, or install process, of the pistons. Seen something like it happen not too long ago with somebody's Keith Black pistons. I'd atleast want to know who makes these pistons myself.
EDIT: Displacement calculation revisions: bore & stroke = 3.687"(93.6498mm) x 3.5039389"(89mm) = 149.77279322747282 CID = 2455.2916922536528 cc = ~2.46L
Last edited by MudHippy; 05-13-2011 at 07:11 AM.
#6
As far as I can tell, no they won't. Not without boring + ~.015"(~.381mm) over.
3.701"(94.0054mm) piston size
+ ~.001"(~.0254mm) optimal piston to cylinder clearance
~3.702"(~94.0308mm) optimal bore size
- 3.687"(93.6498mm) current bore size
~.015"(~.381mm) difference in bore size
BTW 3.687" - 3.683" = .004" and is considered excessive as far a piston to cylinder clearance specs. The FSM states it should be .0005"(.015mm)-.0014"(.035mm), or ~.00095"(~.025mm). If those really are correct measurements the pistons are a mismatched size, and that's what caused the failure.
EDIT: bore & stroke = 3.702"(94.0308mm) x 3.5039389"(89mm) = 150.86045741016092 CID = 2473.1222526255892 cc = ~2.47L
3.701"(94.0054mm) piston size
+ ~.001"(~.0254mm) optimal piston to cylinder clearance
~3.702"(~94.0308mm) optimal bore size
- 3.687"(93.6498mm) current bore size
~.015"(~.381mm) difference in bore size
BTW 3.687" - 3.683" = .004" and is considered excessive as far a piston to cylinder clearance specs. The FSM states it should be .0005"(.015mm)-.0014"(.035mm), or ~.00095"(~.025mm). If those really are correct measurements the pistons are a mismatched size, and that's what caused the failure.
EDIT: bore & stroke = 3.702"(94.0308mm) x 3.5039389"(89mm) = 150.86045741016092 CID = 2473.1222526255892 cc = ~2.47L
Last edited by MudHippy; 05-14-2011 at 07:39 AM.
#7
Registered User
Why not just take the engine to a machine shop and ask them. And with the broken piston I am sure your gonna have to bore an additional amount.
Last edited by xxxtreme22r; 05-12-2011 at 05:14 PM.
Trending Topics
#11
Registered User
But hey, LCEngineering knows everything right?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post