84-85 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd gen pickups and 1st gen 4Runners with solid front axles

Is it just me or

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 06:03 PM
  #1  
TWISTEDTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: California
Cool Is it just me or

is the V6 4x4 slightly higher then the 22RE Toyota?

I'm refereeing to the 89- 95's.. its been bugging me for a while now but my Toyota is almost an inch lower in the rear then the front. Then i go an notice the V6's (same year's) seem to be all around higher?

Thanks guys


-Joe
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 06:09 PM
  #2  
nix4x4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 2
From: I'm an Ohio boy!
Can't say I've ever put much thought into that one. I did always think that the 4Runners sat lower than trucks, rear sag or no rear sag. This may be due to the running boards and such. I think that the 22r and 3vz trucks had the same suspension setup, but I can't say for sure.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 09:36 PM
  #3  
dropzone's Avatar
Fossilized
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 19,771
Likes: 456
From: PNW
not sure why you posted an 89-95 thing here (84-85 folder), but Toyota Rear springs (except when you move them up front on an SA) have always kind of sucks.
My '86 Runner sagged, my '84 sagged, my '97 Taco did and now Toyota is fixing my springs on my '05 because they finally came up with a TSB

The Torsion springs up front (on 86-95.5's) seem to last better than the leaves in the rear...
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:53 AM.