Computer Talk Discussions here pertain to mods, troubleshooting, and PC/console gaming

Give me hand, will you?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-09-2004, 10:41 PM
  #1  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
WATRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duvall, WA
Posts: 5,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Give me hand, will you?

I am teaching myself PHP for a future project and using my site as my victim/test bed. I have reworked my "Photos" section and my "Guestbook" so far.

Could you take a look and tell me what you think?

http://www.watrd.com
Old 12-09-2004, 10:43 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
blink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
as of 12:43 MST your dns is not resolving :*(
Old 12-09-2004, 10:50 PM
  #3  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
WATRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duvall, WA
Posts: 5,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
*sigh* Damn DNS takes longer to propogate every time I change hosts It's been about 24 hours now, so I had hoped it would be completely sorted out by now

Can you hit it without the www ?
Old 12-09-2004, 11:01 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
blink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
17 minutes later it works....lol Rob its looking good my friend... tell me if you need any help All i do at work is code php to utilize sql... variety is good!

Last edited by blink; 12-09-2004 at 11:04 PM.
Old 12-10-2004, 07:05 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
midiwall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattleish, WA
Posts: 9,048
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
First impression - this incarnation is the first one that didn't hang a browser other than IE. I dunno what you had up there on the old site, but it would stall Netscape, Firefox, Opera, etc. trying to load the main pic and just HOG the CPU.


Second impression - You should take a look on a non-IE browser. It's not playing nice.The top row has a vertical scroll bar on it and none of the buttons work.

(click for a larger pic)



I'll be in & out today, but will check back if you want to actively work on it.
Old 12-10-2004, 10:28 AM
  #6  
Contributing Member
 
Waterboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seems to work alot better then the old one. Looks good.
Where's the pictures of your old rides?
Old 12-10-2004, 10:56 AM
  #7  
Contributing Member
 
PoBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having a top frame that doesnt use size by % of screen is difficult to pull off. If you want to use frames I reccomend putting the site navigation on a left side or allow horrizontal scroll since when I make the screen small, the buttons wrap and cause a verticle scroll bar to appear for your top frame.

Looks great otherwise...just get some new buttons or just use text for your links
Old 12-10-2004, 11:03 AM
  #8  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
WATRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duvall, WA
Posts: 5,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by midiwall
First impression - this incarnation is the first one that didn't hang a browser other than IE. I dunno what you had up there on the old site, but it would stall Netscape, Firefox, Opera, etc. trying to load the main pic and just HOG the CPU.


Second impression - You should take a look on a non-IE browser. It's not playing nice.The top row has a vertical scroll bar on it and none of the buttons work.

(click for a larger pic)



I'll be in & out today, but will check back if you want to actively work on it.
The scroll bar I can fix, it should just need a couple more pixels in the vertical height of the header frame.

As far as hanging, nothing has changed on the main page, so that doesn't make any sense Literally, the only things I have dug into so far are the Guestbook and Photos sections. Both frames in the main page are the same as they have been for the last year.

The mechanism I am using for the nav buttons is this;

<INPUT id="Mods" type="button" value="Mods" name="Mods" onClick="JScript:parent.frames.mainFrame.navigate( 'mods/index.htm')">

Edit: Trying again without the <> since it executes it with them...

INPUT id="Mods" type="button" value="Mods" name="Mods" onClick="JScript:parent.frames.mainFrame.navigate( 'mods/index.htm')"

That should be pretty standard script, at least it seems to conform to the web standards that I am aware of. Suggestions?
Old 12-10-2004, 11:05 AM
  #9  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
WATRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duvall, WA
Posts: 5,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Waterboy
Seems to work alot better then the old one. Looks good.
Where's the pictures of your old rides?
I have some scans that will being going into a page dedicated to past rides... coming soon.
Old 12-10-2004, 11:06 AM
  #10  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
WATRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duvall, WA
Posts: 5,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PoBoy
Having a top frame that doesnt use size by % of screen is difficult to pull off. If you want to use frames I reccomend putting the site navigation on a left side or allow horrizontal scroll since when I make the screen small, the buttons wrap and cause a verticle scroll bar to appear for your top frame.

Looks great otherwise...just get some new buttons or just use text for your links
Thanks for the suggestions, I will explore some options.
Old 12-10-2004, 11:11 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
GRNTACO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: On a trail in WA.
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I like it.

Why doesn't it work with Mozilla? It's fine with IE.
Old 12-10-2004, 11:29 AM
  #12  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
WATRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duvall, WA
Posts: 5,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GRNTACO
I like it.

Why doesn't it work with Mozilla? It's fine with IE.
I can't say. I will have to dig into it a bit. My stats say the 98.3% of my traffic is from IE, so I haven't worried too much about alternate browsers, but with the popularity of FireFox taking off, I may have to spend some time on compatibility.
Old 12-10-2004, 11:33 AM
  #13  
Contributing Member
 
CynicX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep doesnt work with firefox, and after a friend of my showed me an exploit in IE I refuse to use it for anything anymore.....esp. since I'm doing so much online shopping for christmas.....good luck with the site though.....
Old 12-10-2004, 11:53 AM
  #14  
Contributing Member
 
PoBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CynicX
Yep doesnt work with firefox, and after a friend of my showed me an exploit in IE I refuse to use it for anything anymore.....esp. since I'm doing so much online shopping for christmas.....good luck with the site though.....
Heh...there are some in FF too...google it.
Old 12-10-2004, 05:29 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
blink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
firefox and mozilla are throwing a jscript error of "Error: parent.frames.mainFrame.navigate is not a function"
Old 12-10-2004, 05:39 PM
  #16  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
WATRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duvall, WA
Posts: 5,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, is there a more compatible format for that command? I like my buttons.
Old 12-11-2004, 06:14 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
midiwall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattleish, WA
Posts: 9,048
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by WATRD
So, is there a more compatible format for that command? I like my buttons.
In general, this site will help:

http://javascript.internet.com/navigation/


In specific, I think you're looking for:

"Change 2 Frames"
http://javascript.internet.com/navig...-2-frames.html


Thanks for caring Rob.
Old 12-11-2004, 07:39 AM
  #18  
Contributing Member
 
tulsa_97SR5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tried it out with opera and firefox on a linux pc. Firefox didn't like it much, but Opera had 0 problems, even left a mssg in the guestbook. I'm sure this is a huge relief to you, as Opera for linux is no doubt the #1 browser to view your website.

I really like the layout & way the slideshow works in your gallery section, very nice.
Old 12-14-2004, 03:39 PM
  #19  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
WATRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duvall, WA
Posts: 5,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Okay guys, I reworked the nav buttons to scripting that is supposed to be more friendly to alternate browsers. I also reworked things to fit a bit better at 800x600, though it's not perfect. I also adjusted sizing to get rid of the scroll bar in the top frame.

Could those of you who reported issues take another look and tell me what you see?

http://www.watrd.com

Thanks!
Old 12-14-2004, 03:47 PM
  #20  
Contributing Member
 
tulsa_97SR5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by WATRD
Could those of you who reported issues take another look and tell me what you see?

http://www.watrd.com

Thanks!
firefox on a linux box = works great. opera still works great. Only problem I found was on the Bio page, in both browsers, nothing about Maury Povitch?!?!

Great looking site man!


Quick Reply: Give me hand, will you?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:59 AM.