Rortrex SC
#22
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Iona, ID
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by oly884
There has to be some people interested in doing this. Any advice comments, or suggestions on how this should be put together would be nice.
There has to be some people interested in doing this. Any advice comments, or suggestions on how this should be put together would be nice.
#23
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Iona, ID
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by oly884
With this type of super charger would you want the MAF sensor before or after the S/C?
With this type of super charger would you want the MAF sensor before or after the S/C?
#25
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Iona, ID
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Cebby
This is the same response I got from Magneson about the units they make for TRD. Do they all have the same copy writer?
This is the same response I got from Magneson about the units they make for TRD. Do they all have the same copy writer?
Last edited by Faded; 10-07-2003 at 01:42 PM.
#26
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Iona, ID
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by oly884
cool, I was also thinking with my setup I could have a HOOD mounted intercooler. I'd need to do some serious fabbing, but it wouldn't be too hard.
cool, I was also thinking with my setup I could have a HOOD mounted intercooler. I'd need to do some serious fabbing, but it wouldn't be too hard.
Hmmm... I was thinking the easiest route would be to ditch the A/C compressor and use the bracketry to mount the S/C. Switch the airbox and the battery places and use a front mount intercooler that has an in/out on each end. This way your piping would be super short and the I/C would benefit more being mounted vertically on the front of the truck instead of layed back where it won't recieve as much air flow. Also, hot air will rise in the engine bay and might lead to heat soak at lower speeds with the I/C on top of the engine. Just my $0.02
#27
Registered User
Originally posted by Faded
Actually the Roots-type S/C is less efficient than a centrifugal S/C. Because I don't like typing length explinations I found a little clip for ya'll:
Actually the Roots-type S/C is less efficient than a centrifugal S/C. Because I don't like typing length explinations I found a little clip for ya'll:
For the money, I'd yank the 3.0 first.
#28
Originally posted by Faded
Hmmm... I was thinking the easiest route would be to ditch the A/C compressor and use the bracketry to mount the S/C. Switch the airbox and the battery places and use a front mount intercooler that has an in/out on each end. This way your piping would be super short and the I/C would benefit more being mounted vertically on the front of the truck instead of layed back where it won't recieve as much air flow. Also, hot air will rise in the engine bay and might lead to heat soak at lower speeds with the I/C on top of the engine. Just my $0.02
Hmmm... I was thinking the easiest route would be to ditch the A/C compressor and use the bracketry to mount the S/C. Switch the airbox and the battery places and use a front mount intercooler that has an in/out on each end. This way your piping would be super short and the I/C would benefit more being mounted vertically on the front of the truck instead of layed back where it won't recieve as much air flow. Also, hot air will rise in the engine bay and might lead to heat soak at lower speeds with the I/C on top of the engine. Just my $0.02
#29
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Iona, ID
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Cebby
Of course, your article WAS from Sport Compact Car - Home of the 4 foot wing...
Of course, your article WAS from Sport Compact Car - Home of the 4 foot wing...
#30
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Iona, ID
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by oly884
What type of fuel mod would be necesary?
What type of fuel mod would be necesary?
#32
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Having a sc under the hood of my runner would be awesome... I am sick of the low HP...
I don't think that MPG would suffer that much... I could not immgane losing much as from many other kits that put about 5psi to 7psi they are only lossing about .5mpg at the most
I don't think that MPG would suffer that much... I could not immgane losing much as from many other kits that put about 5psi to 7psi they are only lossing about .5mpg at the most
#33
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Have there been any replies from Boostec or DOA? or any new news for the sp30? I found this a real interesting thread and if it sounds feasible, I would definitly be interested in getting a set-up for my 3.slow if the price was right.
#34
Registered User
Thread Starter
I couldn't send the email to Boostec for some reason. You can try if you'd like. It's Boostec@msn.com. While it's something I really want, I need it to already be in kit form with everything needed to get it up and running. I don't have the time or the money to do all the research right now. I was hoping that one of you guys who did have the time or money would figure it out and by the time I got around to it, I'd be able to ask questions from those who already had done it.
Last edited by Churnd; 10-26-2003 at 02:49 PM.