View Poll Results: What Octane do you use most of the time in your 2nd gen.?
<= 87
126
69.61%
89
22
12.15%
91
23
12.71%
>=93
10
5.52%
Voters: 181. You may not vote on this poll
What Octane do you use most of the time?
#41
Contributing Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: cookeville tn.
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just a some anecdotal comments...I hauled gas for a summer down in Fl. It was funny the special grades got a "squirt" of something that was in a container the size of about 2 55 gal barrels per semi tank load ?
And the Indian (from India) guys wanted me to dump 83 in the 93 ground tanks and I refused...cost me my job
And the Indian (from India) guys wanted me to dump 83 in the 93 ground tanks and I refused...cost me my job
#42
Registered User
Cost you your job, but not your peace of mind...if you happen to have any..hehe.
I run only what I can afford, which is regular...usually 87, sometimes 85 when I'm not at my regular station. I have '86 22re and a '92 3vze and live not too high of an altitude in the Ozarks, and the '92 never has any problems. Well, neither does the '86, but...
(BTW, crackerjack....I'm originally from Memphis. I traveled to Cookeville about 15 years ago with a buddy and helped build a Buddist retreat at some fellow's house in the boonies. He had his own saw mill and cut all the lumber for it. Nice little town ya'll have. We stopped at a little chinese restaurant on the way out.)
I run only what I can afford, which is regular...usually 87, sometimes 85 when I'm not at my regular station. I have '86 22re and a '92 3vze and live not too high of an altitude in the Ozarks, and the '92 never has any problems. Well, neither does the '86, but...
(BTW, crackerjack....I'm originally from Memphis. I traveled to Cookeville about 15 years ago with a buddy and helped build a Buddist retreat at some fellow's house in the boonies. He had his own saw mill and cut all the lumber for it. Nice little town ya'll have. We stopped at a little chinese restaurant on the way out.)
Last edited by thook; 01-12-2007 at 09:34 PM.
#44
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My old 3.0 pinged horribly on anything but premium, the mileage never got any better but the ping went away.
I only run premium and octane booster in my truck which now has a 95 T-100 3.4 in it, and it has never pinged even before the octane booster, but the knock sensors are picking up an excessive ping and sending my computer into safe mode which is 5 degrees of timing and minimal fuel, so why would the regular cheap gas make this better as stated earlier, I am confused.
I only run premium and octane booster in my truck which now has a 95 T-100 3.4 in it, and it has never pinged even before the octane booster, but the knock sensors are picking up an excessive ping and sending my computer into safe mode which is 5 degrees of timing and minimal fuel, so why would the regular cheap gas make this better as stated earlier, I am confused.
#45
Registered User
Its been mentioned a few times now that our ECU's cant detect higher octane and advance the timing, but did any of you ever condsider that when running 87 or 85 you might just be driving around with permanently retarded timing? they can do that...
i run 89 because it stops my 3.0 from pinging. These engines might have been designed to run 87 when they were new, but as deposits build up in the combustion chamber they create uneven temperatures (hot spots) that can cause detonation... I don't think most of us have clean engines anymore..
i run 89 because it stops my 3.0 from pinging. These engines might have been designed to run 87 when they were new, but as deposits build up in the combustion chamber they create uneven temperatures (hot spots) that can cause detonation... I don't think most of us have clean engines anymore..
#47
[QUOTE=xxJDxx;51256264]Its been mentioned a few times now that our ECU's cant detect higher octane and advance the timing, but did any of you ever condsider that when running 87 or 85 you might just be driving around with permanently retarded timing? they can do that...
Of course the ECU can't tell what kind of gas in in the car, but it does constantly listen[literally...the knock sensor is in effect a microphone] for pinging; when it hears pinging, it retards the timing; If you have a higher octane gas, it'll be able to advance the timing more, before pinging starts. So the ECU can sense, in an indirect fashion, what kind of gas is being used.
Of course the ECU can't tell what kind of gas in in the car, but it does constantly listen[literally...the knock sensor is in effect a microphone] for pinging; when it hears pinging, it retards the timing; If you have a higher octane gas, it'll be able to advance the timing more, before pinging starts. So the ECU can sense, in an indirect fashion, what kind of gas is being used.
#48
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I live in Colorado 5,500ft I bought my runner last april from a guy how never used under 89' I fill up at Costco they have two choices 87 or 91 I run 91 in my tank I get good gas millage and everything sounds good. I never ever let my tank go below 1/2 this helps to get even better millage and does not ever make my motor work harder than it needs to.
#49
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Temecula Valley, CA
Posts: 12,723
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
I use 87 octane in both my trucks without problems. The 88 4Runner get's slightly better mileage with higher octane, maybe 2 mpg more, so it's not enough to justify the extra cost per gallon.
Consider a 17 gallon tank with 87 @ 2.85/gallon and 91 @ 3.55/gallon. 2 more mpg means about 34 more miles on a tank of 91 versus 89.
17 gallons @ 2.85 = 48.45 to fill, and @ 3.55 = 65.45 dollars. That means it costs 17 more dollars to go that extra 34 extra miles. For 17 dollars, I could buy almost 6 more gallons of 87 and go 100+ miles, which equates to about 70 miles farther with 87 than the 91 for the same cost.
Summary- 87 octane gets me more miles per dollar than 91.
Consider a 17 gallon tank with 87 @ 2.85/gallon and 91 @ 3.55/gallon. 2 more mpg means about 34 more miles on a tank of 91 versus 89.
17 gallons @ 2.85 = 48.45 to fill, and @ 3.55 = 65.45 dollars. That means it costs 17 more dollars to go that extra 34 extra miles. For 17 dollars, I could buy almost 6 more gallons of 87 and go 100+ miles, which equates to about 70 miles farther with 87 than the 91 for the same cost.
Summary- 87 octane gets me more miles per dollar than 91.
Last edited by abecedarian; 10-19-2009 at 11:15 AM.
#51
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Morgan Hill, Ca
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I use 87 octane in both my trucks without problems. The 88 4Runner get's slightly better mileage with higher octane, maybe 2 mpg more, so it's not enough to justify the extra cost per gallon.
Consider a 17 gallon tank with 87 @ 2.85/gallon and 91 @ 3.55/gallon. 2 more mpg means about 34 more miles on a tank of 91 versus 89.
17 gallons @ 2.85 = 48.45 to fill, and @ 3.55 = 65.45 dollars. That means it costs 17 more dollars to go that extra 34 extra miles. For 17 dollars, I could buy almost 6 more gallons of 87 and go 100+ miles, which equates to about 70 miles farther with 87 than the 91 for the same cost.
Summary- 87 octane gets me more miles per dollar than 91.
Consider a 17 gallon tank with 87 @ 2.85/gallon and 91 @ 3.55/gallon. 2 more mpg means about 34 more miles on a tank of 91 versus 89.
17 gallons @ 2.85 = 48.45 to fill, and @ 3.55 = 65.45 dollars. That means it costs 17 more dollars to go that extra 34 extra miles. For 17 dollars, I could buy almost 6 more gallons of 87 and go 100+ miles, which equates to about 70 miles farther with 87 than the 91 for the same cost.
Summary- 87 octane gets me more miles per dollar than 91.
Take the money you save and buy your significant other dinner periodically. She will make your engine purr.
#53
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Downtown Heckronto, Ontario, Soviet Canuckistan
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I run ethanol-free 87. Sure the emissions are worse, but there's only one gas station that isn't a 30 minute drive from my farm and that's what they sell.
#54
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Morgan Hill, Ca
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#55
Registered User
has everyone been forced to use the 10% ethanol now? is that nationwide? we have it in ATL metro all year now. i hate it. i don't notice the effect as much in the truck, which i always use 87, but in the motorcycle (twincarb) it will start to pop on decel depending on which brand (thus what % of ethanol) i use. (also 87) i always try to get chevron. BP makes my bike pop a lot.
#56
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Downtown Heckronto, Ontario, Soviet Canuckistan
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
has everyone been forced to use the 10% ethanol now? is that nationwide? we have it in ATL metro all year now. i hate it. i don't notice the effect as much in the truck, which i always use 87, but in the motorcycle (twincarb) it will start to pop on decel depending on which brand (thus what % of ethanol) i use. (also 87) i always try to get chevron. BP makes my bike pop a lot.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GreatLakesGuy
The Classifieds GraveYard
8
09-04-2015 09:27 AM