Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

So you want to get more from the 3.0 huh?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-31-2007, 12:08 PM
  #1  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
mt_goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oklahoma State
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
So you want to get more from the 3.0 huh?

Ok you guys that have a nice polished 3.0 and don't mind doing a little more polishing, you may be interested in this:

http://www.mapecu.com/

Here's a thread going about it over on CT:
http://www.customtacos.com/forum/showthread.php?t=81996

I believe this would let you eliminate the whole AFM and let you custom tune the air/fuel ratio on your 3.0. Gadget has found that custom tuning some of the newer stock NA trucks can gain about 15 HP over the stock ECU fuel maps. I think there is a possiblility of also gaining some MPG too since the stock ECU runs very rich in open loop. I know many of you run a lot in open loop because WOT is the only way to get the 3.0 up that hill right.

Anyway just an idea, I have nothing to gain from this but someone who's brave may want to try it.

Last edited by mt_goat; 08-25-2008 at 06:23 AM.
Old 01-31-2007, 12:17 PM
  #2  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
mt_goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oklahoma State
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Oh you would also need a wide band A/F ratio gauge for tuning so figure in $$$ for that too. Here's a good choice on that: http://www.urdusa.com/product_info.p...s_id=540003768

Last edited by mt_goat; 02-01-2007 at 05:40 AM.
Old 01-31-2007, 12:34 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
jht3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
this is a MAP based piggyback. There are many products like this on the market like Megasquirt, Split Second, etc that use MAP, MAF, or TPS sensors.

These types of systems are used with great success on many engines. no reason it can't be put on a 3vze, but i've always understood one of the main restrictions on this engine is the entire intake.
Old 01-31-2007, 12:38 PM
  #4  
Contributing Member
 
mastacox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I wanted more out of my 3.0 too, so I bought a Supercharged '98 4Runner
Old 01-31-2007, 01:01 PM
  #5  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
mt_goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oklahoma State
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by jht3
this is a MAP based piggyback. There are many products like this on the market like Megasquirt, Split Second, etc that use MAP, MAF, or TPS sensors.

These types of systems are used with great success on many engines. no reason it can't be put on a 3vze, but i've always understood one of the main restrictions on this engine is the entire intake.
Oh ok, I didn't know that. This was the first one I happen to notice that would replace a flap (AFM). I'm not sure where all the restrictions are, I'm pretty sure the AFM is a big one though just by looking at the tiny opening. I seem to remember EB saying how small the exhaust valves are compared to everything else (many have installed his OS valves on here).

In any case even with all the resrictions don't you think a custom tune could help?

Last edited by mt_goat; 01-31-2007 at 01:05 PM.
Old 01-31-2007, 01:17 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
jht3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the "barn door" flap on an AFM certainly is a restriction. MAF sensors are an improvement. with a MAP sensor or TPS/RPM calculation, you can run a straight, huge intake tube. the next restriction will be the intake manifold.

with a fell tuned piggyback, you would probably notice quicker on/off throttle inputs
Old 01-31-2007, 01:32 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Calgary, AB, Can
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like a cool option, and not a bad price considering FAST(or simaler setups) are $1000+. They mention forced induction though, but you're doing FI you need more than just fuel, you need timing control too.

I don't have a 3.0 anymore but I'd be curious to see how a 3.0 would respond to one of these.
Old 01-31-2007, 01:38 PM
  #8  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
mt_goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oklahoma State
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Bill
Looks like a cool option, and not a bad price considering FAST(or simaler setups) are $1000+. They mention forced induction though, but you're doing FI you need more than just fuel, you need timing control too.

I don't have a 3.0 anymore but I'd be curious to see how a 3.0 would respond to one of these.
Right you are, this one does the timing map too and it does work for a distributor:
http://www.mapecu.co.nz/map2.html

Last edited by mt_goat; 01-31-2007 at 01:39 PM.
Old 01-31-2007, 07:32 PM
  #9  
Banned
 
^VooDoo^'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Alhambra CA.
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I came across this and posted it on anothere thred here about turboing a 3.0.
Old 02-04-2007, 01:34 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
dcg9381's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: austin, tx
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by jht3
this is a MAP based piggyback. There are many products like this on the market like Megasquirt, Split Second, etc that use MAP, MAF, or TPS sensors.

Most of the people that I've seen try piggybacks that integrate with the 22re/3.0 AFM have not been happy with the results. I don't know the particulars, but my understanding is that these motors use very unconvential signals that aren't easily manipulated.

The later link - full ECU replacement *speed density* looks like a viable alternative, although I'd want to see some references on it.. It's priced to come in under SDS.
Old 02-04-2007, 01:44 PM
  #11  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
mt_goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oklahoma State
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by dcg9381
Most of the people that I've seen try piggybacks that integrate with the 22re/3.0 AFM have not been happy with the results. .
As I understand it this doesn't integrate with the AFM, it totally replaces the AFM.

Last edited by mt_goat; 02-05-2007 at 04:12 AM.
Old 02-04-2007, 06:06 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
^VooDoo^'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Alhambra CA.
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Wont work, I printed and read all the spects needed, It will not work on 12v sensor systems, Hence the VAFM and TPS.
If you can revamp those 2 things to work with 5v then you have a problem of the ECU not working with them.

If you eliminate the ECU, AFM and TPS all together and start from scratch with the MAP sensor it can be done.
I was so hoping this system would have worked.
Old 02-04-2007, 06:31 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
dcg9381's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: austin, tx
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
As I read more, they're both piggybacks.
No, MAP-ECU2 is a piggy-back ECU that allows you to modify many parameters but retain the drivability of the OEM ECU. For example, your OEM ECU still fires the fuel injectors so if you install larger injectors, they need to be the same type.
As stated above, may not work with a 12v AFM system.. Might ask them about getting it to work with 12v systems, you certainly could step it down via voltage divider, but I don't think you'll get it to "trick" the factory ECU.
Old 02-04-2007, 06:41 PM
  #14  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
mt_goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oklahoma State
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by ^VooDoo^
Wont work, I printed and read all the spects needed, It will not work on 12v sensor systems, Hence the VAFM and TPS.
If you can revamp those 2 things to work with 5v then you have a problem of the ECU not working with them.

If you eliminate the ECU, AFM and TPS all together and start from scratch with the MAP sensor it can be done.
I was so hoping this system would have worked.

Well, that's too bad. It would have been interesting to see.
Old 02-04-2007, 06:54 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Stomis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Point Pleasant NJ
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd rather put my $400 to a sbc or 4.3 vortec...
Old 02-04-2007, 09:53 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
Crymson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ^VooDoo^
Wont work, I printed and read all the spects needed, It will not work on 12v sensor systems, Hence the VAFM and TPS.
If you can revamp those 2 things to work with 5v then you have a problem of the ECU not working with them.

If you eliminate the ECU, AFM and TPS all together and start from scratch with the MAP sensor it can be done.
I was so hoping this system would have worked.
The 3VZE VAFM and TPS sensor both operate on the 0-5V scale.
Old 07-06-2011, 08:30 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
Asuarez737's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: California
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so is there anyway to bypass the afm and put a big intake pipe without the bulky afm?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
91yotapup
3.4 Swaps
4
03-05-2019 10:41 AM
scott90
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
7
10-04-2015 09:21 AM
Jdgarrison
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
1
10-01-2015 05:22 PM
Jdgarrison
Newbie Tech Section
0
10-01-2015 02:11 PM
93RedKrawler
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
2
09-29-2015 02:50 PM



Quick Reply: So you want to get more from the 3.0 huh?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:20 PM.