performance/mpg
#1
performance/mpg
to start off i have a 88 pickup with a 22re 5speed that is stock. i was wondering what i can do to it to increace performance and/or gas mileage? i was told i should run an intake on it and relocate it for better air? for any of you's who did that first question is where did you locate it to and second what did you do with the air flow sensor? Also would taking out the cat and just run straight pipe to a glass pack help? Thanks
#2
Contributing Member
What year rig?
Engines are quite efficient at liberating the chemical energy in the fuel. You want to make more power, you have to burn more gas. PERIOD.
First step - when was the last time you did a tuneup (plugs, wires, cap, rotor)?
Engines are quite efficient at liberating the chemical energy in the fuel. You want to make more power, you have to burn more gas. PERIOD.
First step - when was the last time you did a tuneup (plugs, wires, cap, rotor)?
#3
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Temecula Valley, CA
Posts: 12,723
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
The thing to think about when optimizing mileage is to keep the engine turning at or slightly below the rpm it produces its peak torque with the least amount of throttle (accelerator pedal applied) possible, or at worse, running a higher RPM with less throttle.
I can get 24+ MPG with my 88 on 31's if I keep the vehicle speed below 70, and downshift before I have to (when climbing hills), even dipping into 3rd gear (and keeping it at 60+ miles per hour).
Under-revving an engine can hurt mileage just as much as over-revving.
The trick is keeping the engine in whichever part of the powerband that is the most efficient given the vehicle speed.
I can get 24+ MPG with my 88 on 31's if I keep the vehicle speed below 70, and downshift before I have to (when climbing hills), even dipping into 3rd gear (and keeping it at 60+ miles per hour).
Under-revving an engine can hurt mileage just as much as over-revving.
The trick is keeping the engine in whichever part of the powerband that is the most efficient given the vehicle speed.
#5
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Temecula Valley, CA
Posts: 12,723
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
hmm... I thought 3-way (not to be confused with 2-way) catalytic converters were meant to convert unburned hydrocarbons into CO2?
so you mean we gave up 'haze' in favor of contributing to global warming?
Damn those environmentalists....
lest not us forget that CO2 is one of the 'least' affecting 'greenhouse gasses' (having already reached its max absorption).
Water vapor, being the most affecting (and not included in the models).
so you mean we gave up 'haze' in favor of contributing to global warming?
Damn those environmentalists....
lest not us forget that CO2 is one of the 'least' affecting 'greenhouse gasses' (having already reached its max absorption).
Water vapor, being the most affecting (and not included in the models).
Last edited by abecedarian; 12-11-2008 at 08:50 PM.
#7
Running just an intake won't get you much, if any noticeable results. You will want a header and exhaust to make use of the increased air from the intake. But like others have said, make sure everything else is running at its best before you start upgrading.
Trending Topics
#8
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Cuation once you get started it never ends, but its cool and I enjoy it. Hell my biggest fuel drain is the aggressive 12.5" width mud tires on steel rims I run. The 10.5" A/Ts on aluminum weight a lot less with way less rolling resistance. But I'm too lazy to swap them out constantly and even posted the ATs for sell.
#12
hmm... I thought 3-way (not to be confused with 2-way) catalytic converters were meant to convert unburned hydrocarbons into CO2?
so you mean we gave up 'haze' in favor of contributing to global warming?
Damn those environmentalists....
lest not us forget that CO2 is one of the 'least' affecting 'greenhouse gasses' (having already reached its max absorption).
Water vapor, being the most affecting (and not included in the models).
so you mean we gave up 'haze' in favor of contributing to global warming?
Damn those environmentalists....
lest not us forget that CO2 is one of the 'least' affecting 'greenhouse gasses' (having already reached its max absorption).
Water vapor, being the most affecting (and not included in the models).
Matt16. I live in SE Asia right now. I have pictures in Vietnam and China that make that look like a clear day. I think everyone who is against environmental protection should move to China and do whatever they want and not screw with the air I like to breath.
Last edited by gte718p; 12-13-2008 at 02:08 AM.
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have Downey's big CAI cone filter and their header with 2.5" exhaust system on an otherwise stock vehicle. I went from 19 MPG to 22 MPG on the highway. Other than being loud I am happy with the improvements.
2.5" exhaust systems are not popular here on this forum as most folks swear by 2.25". I haven't seen any scientific evidence to say why most folks opinion is against the 2.5" system but my experience with it and with Downey has been favorable.
Hope that helps you decided what you want to do.
2.5" exhaust systems are not popular here on this forum as most folks swear by 2.25". I haven't seen any scientific evidence to say why most folks opinion is against the 2.5" system but my experience with it and with Downey has been favorable.
Hope that helps you decided what you want to do.
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you've bought a quality kit from LCE or Downey or wherever, it should include a provision for your MAF sensor.