Pics you might want to feast your eyes on.
12-02-2003, 03:26 PM
#21
Contributing Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Solano Co, CA Originally a North Idaho Hick
Posts: 4,267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yup that's the one where they do the ol lighter fluid trick. Just think the worst thing I worry about when wheeling is body damage or breaking something. They have to worry about falling into a 400 foot deep crevas!!
12-02-2003, 04:34 PM
#24
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Washington State
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#2 is Photoshopped too. Look at the top curve of the tires, you will see a second hump that would be the stock tires. Also note the lack of falling snow in front of the body, but all over in front of the tires.
12-02-2003, 05:10 PM
#25
Contributing Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Littleton,CO
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by scott.475
#2 is Photoshopped too. Look at the top curve of the tires, you will see a second hump that would be the stock tires. Also note the lack of falling snow in front of the body, but all over in front of the tires.
#2 is Photoshopped too. Look at the top curve of the tires, you will see a second hump that would be the stock tires. Also note the lack of falling snow in front of the body, but all over in front of the tires.
I think you're looking at the photochop of #2 which is a 3rd gen placed over the 2nd gen one,obviously the 3rd gen is a chop.
12-02-2003, 05:17 PM
#26
Contributing Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Greenville, South Carolina
Posts: 1,736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by X-AWDriver
I think you're looking at the photochop of #2 which is a 3rd gen placed over the 2nd gen one,obviously the 3rd gen is a chop.
I think you're looking at the photochop of #2 which is a 3rd gen placed over the 2nd gen one,obviously the 3rd gen is a chop.
*EDIT* Sorry didn't see the chop done to Brian's rig
Thats so funny though. You should definetly do that Brian
Last edited by Jonathan; 12-02-2003 at 05:28 PM.
12-02-2003, 05:20 PM
#27
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North of the border
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by scott.475
#2 is Photoshopped too. Look at the top curve of the tires, you will see a second hump that would be the stock tires. Also note the lack of falling snow in front of the body, but all over in front of the tires.
#2 is Photoshopped too. Look at the top curve of the tires, you will see a second hump that would be the stock tires. Also note the lack of falling snow in front of the body, but all over in front of the tires.
12-02-2003, 06:04 PM
#28
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Washington State
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
:pat: Oh, you guys and your Runners, you always mess me up with your 2nd, 3rd and 4th Gens! Okay, I screwed up. When I looked at the second picture posted, the obviously 'chopped one, I didn't go back to compare it to the first legitimate one. Since I am a truck guy, not a 'Runner guy, I don't look at a bunch of the details to tell the difference, so I just thought the second picture was the same as the first one, simply reposted. I got focused on the tires and snow and forgot all about those huge flairs.
So, any, thanks everybody for your help in making me look like an idiot, as I wasn't doing a good enough job on my own!:pat:
So, any, thanks everybody for your help in making me look like an idiot, as I wasn't doing a good enough job on my own!:pat:
12-02-2003, 06:10 PM
#29
LOL
Originally posted by scott.475
:pat: Oh, you guys and your Runners, you always mess me up with your 2nd, 3rd and 4th Gens! Okay, I screwed up. When I looked at the second picture posted, the obviously 'chopped one, I didn't go back to compare it to the first legitimate one. Since I am a truck guy, not a 'Runner guy, I don't look at a bunch of the details to tell the difference, so I just thought the second picture was the same as the first one, simply reposted. I got focused on the tires and snow and forgot all about those huge flairs.
So, any, thanks everybody for your help in making me look like an idiot, as I wasn't doing a good enough job on my own!:pat:
:pat: Oh, you guys and your Runners, you always mess me up with your 2nd, 3rd and 4th Gens! Okay, I screwed up. When I looked at the second picture posted, the obviously 'chopped one, I didn't go back to compare it to the first legitimate one. Since I am a truck guy, not a 'Runner guy, I don't look at a bunch of the details to tell the difference, so I just thought the second picture was the same as the first one, simply reposted. I got focused on the tires and snow and forgot all about those huge flairs.
So, any, thanks everybody for your help in making me look like an idiot, as I wasn't doing a good enough job on my own!:pat:
12-02-2003, 06:46 PM
#32
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Toyminator
Sorry about all the posts, i dont know how to put them all into one...
Sorry about all the posts, i dont know how to put them all into one...
12-02-2003, 07:14 PM
#34
Contributing Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That #1 picture looks like a 3rd gen I saw in Dallas this past weekend...
it was a 2000 or 2001 4x4 limited ed. with 24" DUBS..oh it also had rear lockers and enough cig burns for my wife to just laugh and say "next" LOL dip˟˟˟˟s ( I think they wanted $25,000..because the wheels were worth so much)
It looked so bad
it was a 2000 or 2001 4x4 limited ed. with 24" DUBS..oh it also had rear lockers and enough cig burns for my wife to just laugh and say "next" LOL dip˟˟˟˟s ( I think they wanted $25,000..because the wheels were worth so much)
It looked so bad
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
94 Newbie
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
3
08-06-2015 10:33 AM
crashburnoveride
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
1
07-10-2015 06:39 AM
