Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

Good idea? Bad idea? Cheap Blower intake.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2008, 07:53 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
ciscojay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All I ask for is pics...and some of whatever you're on! Call mythbusters too...they can save you the trouble and $$$.
Old 01-15-2008, 08:04 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
Dare44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lincoln, CA
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
im just thinking out loud, u could hook a pulley to the motor that spins up the air and forces it in, o wait thats been done lol
Old 01-15-2008, 08:50 PM
  #23  
Contributing Member
 
AxleIke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Arvada, Colorado
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Holy Good GRIEF.

What was a stupid thread 3.5 years ago is still a stupid thread now.

Where do you people dig this crap up?
Old 01-16-2008, 03:51 AM
  #24  
Registered User
 
CyMoN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: INDIANA
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AxleIke
Holy Good GRIEF.

What was a stupid thread 3.5 years ago is still a stupid thread now.

Where do you people dig this crap up?
lol I think there should be a policy if someone brings up a old thread then later makes a post that has been covered hundreds of times they get banned.

the reason I say this is they have taken the time to look back 3 or 4 years they should have read every thread that WOULD COVER THE BASICS like what lift and what tires what MPG should I get for a 4x4 the infamous clunk or creek from the front of my truck when I turn the steering wheel full right or left... and the list go's on and on
Old 01-16-2008, 04:38 AM
  #25  
Registered User
 
Whitey13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are videos of people doing this all over the 'net
http://youtube.com/watch?v=xwkSr60fk0g
Old 01-16-2008, 02:55 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
jason191918's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hopkins, MN
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mike_d
with at least 4 cylinders, you'll always have at least one cylinder in the intake stroke (of course this assume equal spacing in the firing). if the air was massless, then you may be able to notice different speeds because the cylinder will suck air in at different rates in the inake stroke (very slow at the ends of the stroke, and fastest in the middle). but since the air has mass, it will be flowing at mostly the same speed all the time. it's interesting to note, that on the 22re all four injectors are fired at the same time and the fuel just 'sits' in the intake until the valves open. (in the 3vze there the 3 injectors on each side are fired at the same time). so this leads me to beleive, that even on the scale of one cylinder, the air in the intake will be flowing at a constant rate (otherwise the fuel would probably fall due to gravity).

here's a quick and dirty calculation to show that the air most likely is moving at a constant speed.

assumptions: 2.4L 22re at 3000 rpm (numbers will be the same order of magnitude for just about any engine running at a normal speed)

2.4L @ 3000 rpm means that the engine is sucking in 120L/s of air.

120L/s of air is 120,000 cm^3 of air. The cross section of the intake is about 100cm^2 so that means that the air is flowing in the intake at about 1200cm/s (27mph!)

lets make the assumption that the air is stopped and then needs to be accelerated to 1200cm/s in the time of 1 intake stroke and calculate the forces required to do that.

3000rpm=50hz or only .02sec per revolution. however, only 1/4 of the time is intake so that's realy .005sec for the whole intake time.

so we need to calculate how much force is required to accelerate 120L of air to 1200cm/s in .005sec

120L of air is about 80g (.080kg)

the acceleration is 1200cm/s/.005s or 24000cm/s^2 or 240m/s^2

F=ma = .080gk*240m/s^2 = 192N or about 43 pounds

what all of this means is that if the air needed to be accelerated all the time that the engine would have apply 43 pounds of force on the air (and then when the air stopped it would put 43 pounds of force on the engine). in my 22re the intake is mounted across the front of the engine, that means that there would be 43 pounds of force going back and forth sideways on the truck. i think you could imagine the kind of violent shaking that would occur if you pushed sideways on the truck with 43 pounds of force 3000 times per minute.

i think that this shows that it's very likely that the air is at a constant flow.
Not to get critical, but this is assuming 100% volumetric efficiency. Most engines are about 85% due to exhaust overlap (both valves open) and compression overlap (intake valve open at beginning of compression stroke). You should change your calculations.



Ok maybe that was overly critical.

Old 01-16-2008, 03:09 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
jason191918's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hopkins, MN
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.....
Old 01-16-2008, 04:04 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
ornery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mike_d
with at least 4 cylinders, you'll always have at least one cylinder in the intake stroke (of course this assume equal spacing in the firing). if the air was massless, then you may be able to notice different speeds because the cylinder will suck air in at different rates in the inake stroke (very slow at the ends of the stroke, and fastest in the middle). but since the air has mass, it will be flowing at mostly the same speed all the time. it's interesting to note, that on the 22re all four injectors are fired at the same time and the fuel just 'sits' in the intake until the valves open. (in the 3vze there the 3 injectors on each side are fired at the same time). so this leads me to beleive, that even on the scale of one cylinder, the air in the intake will be flowing at a constant rate (otherwise the fuel would probably fall due to gravity).

here's a quick and dirty calculation to show that the air most likely is moving at a constant speed.

assumptions: 2.4L 22re at 3000 rpm (numbers will be the same order of magnitude for just about any engine running at a normal speed)

2.4L @ 3000 rpm means that the engine is sucking in 120L/s of air.

120L/s of air is 120,000 cm^3 of air. The cross section of the intake is about 100cm^2 so that means that the air is flowing in the intake at about 1200cm/s (27mph!)

lets make the assumption that the air is stopped and then needs to be accelerated to 1200cm/s in the time of 1 intake stroke and calculate the forces required to do that.

3000rpm=50hz or only .02sec per revolution. however, only 1/4 of the time is intake so that's realy .005sec for the whole intake time.

so we need to calculate how much force is required to accelerate 120L of air to 1200cm/s in .005sec

120L of air is about 80g (.080kg)

the acceleration is 1200cm/s/.005s or 24000cm/s^2 or 240m/s^2

F=ma = .080gk*240m/s^2 = 192N or about 43 pounds

what all of this means is that if the air needed to be accelerated all the time that the engine would have apply 43 pounds of force on the air (and then when the air stopped it would put 43 pounds of force on the engine). in my 22re the intake is mounted across the front of the engine, that means that there would be 43 pounds of force going back and forth sideways on the truck. i think you could imagine the kind of violent shaking that would occur if you pushed sideways on the truck with 43 pounds of force 3000 times per minute.

i think that this shows that it's very likely that the air is at a constant flow.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think these calculations are incorrect.

Youre assuming the intake volume is the total displacement on each stroke.. But the displacement is the sum of all four cylinders. So on each stroke, only one cylinder fills with air (2.4l/4=0.6l).. So on each stroke, the engine intakes 0.6l.

And rpm is revolution of the crank, so the frequency of intake isnt 1/4 of the time of revolution, but 1/2 (one up/down movement of the piston) still only 100/sec at 3000 rpm.

I always remember; suck (half revolution; stroke down), squish (half revolution; up), bang (half revolution; stroke down), blow (half revolution; stroke up). Each one of four of the cylinders is doing one action at one time.

So the correct volume calculation would be;

V/s=(2.4l/4)[(3000rpm/60)*2]
V/s=60l/s

Using your estimated values for the mass of air and intake length..

m=60l*0.08kg/120l
m=0.040kg

a=(600cm/s)/(0.01s)
a=60m/s^2

F=ma
F=(0.040kg)*(60m/s^2)
F=24N [or about 5.4 pounds]

...and honestly, there's no these calculations even with the hypothetical estimations would even come reasonably close to the actual force or intake volume due to variables like volumetric efficieny, haha.

Last edited by ornery; 01-16-2008 at 04:08 PM.
Old 01-16-2008, 07:14 PM
  #29  
Contributing Member
 
AxleIke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Arvada, Colorado
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Holy Cow.

Amazing people. Amazing.
Old 01-16-2008, 07:24 PM
  #30  
Registered User
 
the_supernerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sonora, CA
Posts: 1,527
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by ciscojay
All I ask for is pics...and some of whatever you're on! Call mythbusters too...they can save you the trouble and $$$.
Knowing what I know now, I cannot believe I actually thought this would work when I posted 3.5 years ago!

That would be a good Mythbusters experiment whether it would actually work or not. Here is the link to the forum for Mythbusters:

http://community.discovery.com/eve/f...m/f/2991937776

The leaf blower turbo myth has already been posted more than once, but has never made the show to my knowledge.

By the way, if anyone is thinking about trying this on their daily driver, I would recommend against it. Most leaf blowers have a plastic fan, and airflow from a vehicle is likely to be way more than the leaf blower puts out, which will be enough to spin the fan beyond it's limits and either two things will happen:

1. It will break the fan.
2. Vacuum will spin the fan against the crankshaft of the blower, which will apply torque to the bolt opposite of the way it was designed and loosen it.

Either way, parts are going to get sucked in your intake, not to mention all of the dust from it being used as a leaf blower.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
icentropy
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
22
09-16-2020 02:47 PM
toyotamonster
3.4 Swaps
7
04-16-2020 06:02 PM
colinmil
Newbie Tech Section
2
07-06-2015 04:03 PM
MTLroadierunner
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
0
07-06-2015 12:17 PM



Quick Reply: Good idea? Bad idea? Cheap Blower intake.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:35 AM.