95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

891's or 892's? 1 more lift question before I order, want a write up?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 06:52 AM
  #1  
BOSTON4RUNNER's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
891's or 892's? 1 more lift question before I order, want a write up?

I do travel alot and carry a decent amount of weight, plus am about to fab a serious off road read bumper for my 1997 4 runner 3.4 SR5 5 Speed...so I am leaning towards the 892's

I am going to get a kit from Wheelers, which comes with front Rev Tek 3 inch spacers, diff drop kit and they said I can pick my rear springs, which I guess they might charge me a few bucks more but that is fine

I will also swap in new shocks and struts at the time, not longer than stock or anything just good replacements, as I am trying to do this on the cheap.

My question is...would you go with 892's? or 891's?

I do have a beefy safari rack on the truck....and I do not care how stiff the ride is

how much lift do you think this will yield? also I would be more than happy to do a write up and take pictures on the whole process and put it on my website if others think it will be helpful. I am hoping to run 285 75 16s on stock 16 X 7 alum rims...will trim the pinch weld, fender, bumper if need be.

thanks, tim
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 06:56 AM
  #2  
Stegall984R's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
From: OmG, Hi2U !!! .... DANG, my chic's got some SEXY eyes.... among other things. WOOT WOOT !!
i've never even herd of the 892s unless they are brand new....
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 07:02 AM
  #3  
bamachem's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
after settling out w/ some flexing...

OME REAR COIL SPRING OPTIONS:

906's = ~1.5-1.75"
890's = ~2.0"
891's = ~2.5"
892's = ~3.0"

Add ~1/2" to those measurements if you use the conical bumpstop w/ them.

Spring rates are supposedly in the ~300#/in range, so if you have ~150# of extra weight, then subtract ~1/2" from the overall height to get your "normal" height.

Last edited by bamachem; Feb 11, 2005 at 07:04 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 07:08 AM
  #4  
BOSTON4RUNNER's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by bamachem
after settling out w/ some flexing...

OME REAR COIL SPRING OPTIONS:

906's = ~1.5-1.75"
890's = ~2.0"
891's = ~2.5"
892's = ~3.0"

Add ~1/2" to those measurements if you use the conical bumpstop w/ them.

Spring rates are supposedly in the ~300#/in range, so if you have ~150# of extra weight, then subtract ~1/2" from the overall height to get your "normal" height.

thanks.....great info

and do you suggest using the bump stops? or do people typically remove the bump stops?
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 08:06 AM
  #5  
User 051420's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,534
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Rade at ARB
For light loads the OME906 will give about 2" of lift and the OME890 for 2.5" of lift with a medium load.
DO NOT get the 892's.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 08:38 AM
  #6  
Homer666's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Wow.....what a timely thread !! I will be purchasing OME coils and shocks next week. The front's are going to be 882's (I have a Sahara bumper, winch, skid plates, etc). However, I was torn between the 891's and 892's. Like Boston4Runner, I have extra weight in the back (about 150 - 200 lbs of cargo box and contents). I also occasionally tow a trailer with tongue weight between 300 - 350 lbs (but I have the equalizer hitch) so I was leaning towards the 892's.

Would those folks who advise against the 892's please elaborate? Are they too stiff even with extra weight in the back? Since the cost of the 891's and 892's is the same, I don't have a preference one way or the other. I just want to make sure that the coils I buy are the best match for my 4Runner.

Thanks for any information;

James
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 08:51 AM
  #7  
MTL_4runner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 3
From: Montreal, QC Canada
Originally Posted by Homer666
Wow.....what a timely thread !! I will be purchasing OME coils and shocks next week. The front's are going to be 882's (I have a Sahara bumper, winch, skid plates, etc). However, I was torn between the 891's and 892's. Like Boston4Runner, I have extra weight in the back (about 150 - 200 lbs of cargo box and contents). I also occasionally tow a trailer with tongue weight between 300 - 350 lbs (but I have the equalizer hitch) so I was leaning towards the 892's.

Would those folks who advise against the 892's please elaborate? Are they too stiff even with extra weight in the back? Since the cost of the 891's and 892's is the same, I don't have a preference one way or the other. I just want to make sure that the coils I buy are the best match for my 4Runner.

Thanks for any information;

James
I think it will ride like a rock with 892's.....even with 891's most say the ride gets comfortable when towing.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 09:11 AM
  #8  
bamachem's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Homer666
Wow.....what a timely thread !! I will be purchasing OME coils and shocks next week. The front's are going to be 882's (I have a Sahara bumper, winch, skid plates, etc). However, I was torn between the 891's and 892's. Like Boston4Runner, I have extra weight in the back (about 150 - 200 lbs of cargo box and contents). I also occasionally tow a trailer with tongue weight between 300 - 350 lbs (but I have the equalizer hitch) so I was leaning towards the 892's.

Would those folks who advise against the 892's please elaborate? Are they too stiff even with extra weight in the back? Since the cost of the 891's and 892's is the same, I don't have a preference one way or the other. I just want to make sure that the coils I buy are the best match for my 4Runner.

Thanks for any information;

James


Here's some more good reading material....

Using Tundra TRD coils instead of OME on the front: https://www.yotatech.com/forums/f2/new-suspension-setup-trd-front-lift-3rd-gen-4runner-41848/

OME discussion thread: https://www.yotatech.com/forums/f2/actual-old-man-emu-881-891-springs-39005/

and, until his recent SAS, Steve Schaefer was pretty much the IFS king and has probally tried and wheeled more suspension setups than anyone else here. His last one was the Tundra TRD setup and it was the best out of any he tried - his words, not mine.

Originally Posted by sschaefer3
Tundra coils are unbelieveable. Makes me not want to hang a Dana 44.

Best front suspension BAR NONE. Fast, Slow, you name it, they are great. I really like the TRD coils. Yes they do seem to be progressive.
Steve has more info here: http://fastq.com/~sschaefer/parts.html

Last edited by bamachem; Feb 11, 2005 at 09:21 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 10:46 AM
  #9  
BOSTON4RUNNER's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
ok

next question

if I run the factory coils in the front with fresh struts and 3 inch rev tek spacers..and I use 891's in the back .....should I? do I use the conical snubber/bumpstops things you guys mentioned?

or do I leave them out entirely?

please educate me

thanks

Last edited by BOSTON4RUNNER; Feb 11, 2005 at 10:48 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 11:27 AM
  #10  
bamachem's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
you'll need the bumpstops to give you the extra 1/2" of lift so it won't be ass-saggin'
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 11:36 AM
  #11  
BOSTON4RUNNER's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
so the 891's and factory bumstops should yield 3 inches

given the planets are aligned right, the groundhog sees his shadow,,etc etc?
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 11:38 AM
  #12  
bamachem's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
lol... they will initially be closer to 3.5", then settle out after you dirve them a while. depending on how crazy you get when wheeling and how often, they may settle more, then you just add a trimpacker b/w the cone and the coil.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 12:17 PM
  #13  
BOSTON4RUNNER's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by bamachem
lol... they will initially be closer to 3.5", then settle out after you dirve them a while. depending on how crazy you get when wheeling and how often, they may settle more, then you just add a trimpacker b/w the cone and the coil.
so i will wait till it settles then put in the trim packer....i wont be doing a whole lot of off roading, like not alot of serious climbs etc, mainly on the beach....

thanks everyone for your help, i am now on track....i cant go too crazy with this truck as i drive it everyday and am trying to finish another project which you can see by clicking this link: http://sfaboston.bizland.com/cam.htm
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 03:30 PM
  #14  
jacksonpt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
From: Binghamton, NY
FWIW... I've got 891s on my rig. Had them for about 60k miles. I got 3.25" of lift out of them over a very tired factory suspension. I do a fair amount of towing, a fair amount of wheeling, but I have no rear bumper (I do have a custom cargo box that probably weighs in around 100lbs or so). I haven't noticed any sagging, at least not compared to the front, which has sagged a good inch over the years.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 05:14 PM
  #15  
dragr1's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 1
From: Auburn, AL
Here is waht I have:
'99 4Runner V6 4x4 5spd
Front: ARB Bumper, winch, Trailcarnage skidplates
OME 882's, 1 trim packer, OME HD shocks

Rear: Trailcarnage bumper, cargo box full of tools
OME 891's, OME HD shocks

The rear of my 4Runner sits about 0.5" to 1" higher than the front. When loaded for camping (2 coolers and misc stuff in back of 4Runner) and towing my current popup (about 2000 lbs, hitch weight about 180 lbs) the rear might sag an inch, making the 4Runner level. Here's a pic with the 2 coolers inside and 2 people standing on the rear bumper so I can hook up to the camper with an 8" drop hitch:

http://community.webshots.com/album/210824947pEzEMi

I just posted the pic, so it may take a couple of hours for it to show up.

The only person I can think of that has 892's was 44runner, but I think he sold his rig.
The camper is for sale!

Last edited by dragr1; Feb 11, 2005 at 05:16 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 07:58 PM
  #16  
BOSTON4RUNNER's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
that truck looks nice dragr

what size tires?

I am going to jacksonpt's site now
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2005 | 07:09 AM
  #17  
dragr1's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 1
From: Auburn, AL
Originally Posted by BOSTON4RUNNER
that truck looks nice dragr

what size tires?

I am going to jacksonpt's site now

The tires are 285/75/16 (33") BFG MT's.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2005 | 09:20 AM
  #18  
socal98runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Boston,

I'll swap you my 891's for 890's !!!

I don't tow enough to warrant having these
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GreatLakesGuy
The Classifieds GraveYard
8
Sep 4, 2015 09:27 AM
coffey50
Offroad Tech
17
Jul 28, 2015 10:55 AM
TURBOrunnerNM
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
4
Jul 22, 2015 11:01 AM
crashburnoveride
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
1
Jul 10, 2015 06:39 AM
God's Bounty Hunter
Pre 84 Trucks
6
Jul 8, 2015 12:54 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:48 PM.