Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

2005 Frontier V6 vs 2005 Tacoma V6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-16-2004, 07:38 AM
  #21  
Contributing Member
 
Sac State's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Piedmont, North Carolina
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ElwayLite
The iforce is outdated and due for replacement or upgrade, we'll see how the new v8 from toyota performs.
Smoothest engine/tranny combo I have ever driven! Outdated?!
Old 08-16-2004, 04:18 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
EDGE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: outside NYC
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by MvCrash
I only have one question: Is Numnuts one word or two? and if two would it not be Numb Nuts?

MvCrash
You say Numb Nuts I say Num Nuts, after sittin in a dealer waiting room for 4 hours for a 20 minute job a Toyota customer could piss me off to the point where they deserve to die
Old 08-16-2004, 06:18 PM
  #23  
Contributing Member
 
CynicX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sac State
Smoothest engine/tranny combo I have ever driven! Outdated?!

it is outdated and underpowered thats why the 05 the iforce will have vvti and although i cant remember but somewhere from 40 to 70 more HP.....
Old 08-16-2004, 06:53 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
kyle_22r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 3,981
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
i think nissan dropped the ball when they discontinued the hardbody. how many companies have had a single body style span 10 years? the last i checked, a late 80s hardbody usually fetches more in the resale department than a late 80s toyota
Old 08-16-2004, 08:41 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
EDGE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: outside NYC
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by CynicX
it is outdated and underpowered thats why the 05 the iforce will have vvti and although i cant remember but somewhere from 40 to 70 more HP.....
It's outdated in the same way your 04 Tacoma is outdated
Old 08-16-2004, 08:43 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
kenandjenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kyle_22r
i think nissan dropped the ball when they discontinued the hardbody. how many companies have had a single body style span 10 years? the last i checked, a late 80s hardbody usually fetches more in the resale department than a late 80s toyota
I had a 1992 Nissan Hardbody Ext. Cab 4x4 w/ 3.0 V-6 and 4.38 gears. It was an excellent truck. I cranked the torsion bars in front a tad and was able to fit 32x11.50's on it. It has a limited slip rear end and really did good off road.

However, I can tell my Tacoma has a better suspension. The Nissan 3.0 was rated at 154 h.p. and 180 ft lbs, about the same as my 2.7L (150-180) . It would light the 32's up from a Stop. My 2.7L won't even think about spinning the tires, so the torque from the Nissan 3.0 was far superior although the ratings are the same. My Tacoma would easily outrun the Nissan after 60 mph though. My Nissan wouldn't even go 100 mph, but my Tacoma goes 105 pretty easy.
Old 09-08-2004, 05:03 AM
  #27  
Contributing Member
 
Bluto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Columbia, MD
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
(back on topic)

Some pics to compare...

Long bed





No long bed Frontier?




Short bed





Tacoma:

Vehicle Stability Control w/ Traction Control (VSC+TRAC) is available on all except X-Runner. 245 horsepower and 282 lb-ft. No mention of side bags or rear disc brakes? Will it still have an available rear locker?




Frontier:

265 horsepower and 284 lb-ft of torque

Available side bags. Standard 4 wheel disc brakes. Available advanced off-road traction systems and substantially enhanced overall off-road capability. (4-Wheel Limited-Slip (ALBS)?, just like TRAC). No mention of stability control.

Front seat




Rear seat





Dash








I'll take a Tacoma for the quality. Have to wait and see what the market/prices are like. But for a similarly equipped truck ... I guessing the Toyota will have a much higher demand and price.

Last edited by Bluto; 09-08-2004 at 05:08 AM.
Old 09-08-2004, 05:18 AM
  #28  
Contributing Member
 
kickaha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The exterior shot of the Nissan above looks all kinds of wrong. And the back seat area looks too small for a double cab. Except for quality issues, I like the Titan over the (current) Tundra. But I'd take the new Tacoma over the new Frontier any day.
Old 09-08-2004, 05:19 AM
  #29  
lee
Contributing Member
 
lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: boston, ma
Posts: 6,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
toyota cheaped out and gave the new tacoma rear drum brakes.
Old 09-08-2004, 05:27 AM
  #30  
Contributing Member
 
SLC Punk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 5,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No mention of side bags or rear disc brakes? Will it still have an available rear locker?
Drum brakes, rear locker is still available.


toyota cheaped out and gave the new tacoma rear drum brakes.
Yeah in one of the articles I read it stated something like "toyota says the drum brakes give it better stopping power."

I would rather have disc brakes... :pat:
Old 09-08-2004, 05:54 AM
  #31  
Registered User
 
FirstToy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nissan looks like amateur hour compared to the Taco- but it always has been that way.
I cringe at how cheap the Frontier interior looks- and that's a publicity photo.
Old 09-08-2004, 06:10 AM
  #32  
lee
Contributing Member
 
lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: boston, ma
Posts: 6,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
good call, firsttoy.

yea, i read that too slc punk, i think that was in road & track.
Old 09-08-2004, 06:13 AM
  #33  
Contributing Member
 
Bluto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Columbia, MD
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kickaha
... And the back seat area looks too small for a double cab. ...
If you look at the Frontier front interior pic, the front passenger seat is very far foward, the headrest lines up with the B-pillar. It is in the same position in the rear pic. Move the front seat to a normal position, no room in the back seat.

The Frontier cargo area looks much smaller also. Total length is 205.5 inches, 125.9 wheel base.

Tacoma is about 207? 127.2-inch wheelbase with a 60.3-inch cargo bed.
Old 09-08-2004, 06:17 AM
  #34  
Registered User
 
FirstToy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Look at the interior pics-the Frontier back doors look like doggie-door openings
Old 09-08-2004, 06:25 AM
  #35  
Contributing Member
 
Bluto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Columbia, MD
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bluto
(back on topic)
No mention of side bags ....

Edmunds state "crew cab models also offer optional full-length head curtain and front-seat side airbags. "
Old 09-08-2004, 10:34 AM
  #36  
Contributing Member
 
ElwayLite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All i know is generally you try and make the vehicle look better, the "new" frontier front end looks like the one of a few years back, fugly. The tacoma will be the best looking truck out their still, because the only other new model for 2005 is the dakota and its really ugly.
Old 09-08-2004, 11:42 AM
  #37  
Contributing Member
 
SLC Punk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 5,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Look at how flat the seats are in the Nissan, the Tacoma's look much more supportive and comfortable!
Old 09-08-2004, 11:49 AM
  #38  
Registered User
 
kyle_22r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 3,981
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
those aren't trucks, they're large cars with a bed on the end...
Old 09-08-2004, 11:50 AM
  #39  
Contributing Member
 
Pretacopower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by lee
toyota cheaped out and gave the new tacoma rear drum brakes.
I thought the Taco always had rear drums?
Old 09-08-2004, 11:55 AM
  #40  
Registered User
 
RalleRunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern NH
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pretacopower
I thought the Taco always had rear drums?
doesn't really matters, its still un*beat*able


Quick Reply: 2005 Frontier V6 vs 2005 Tacoma V6



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:35 AM.