Cooper Discoverer S/T Maxx
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: King George,VA
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cooper Discoverer S/T Maxx
Cooper Discoverer S/T Maxx
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jim65wagon/5616844087/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jim65wagon/5617425180/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jim65wagon/5617427376/
There they are, fresh off the truck. Coopers new S/T Maxx in a 285/75r16.
First impression:
They are huge! Well, compared to the 255/85/16s they look huge.....I'm sure they'll fit, snugly.
They are heavy! 61 lbs each!
I'm digging the tread pattern, the siping, and the ArmorTec sidewall (which the ST did not have)
Measurements:
Tread is about 9 1/4" wide (that's about 2" wider than the 255/85/16 ST)
Total height is actually 32.5" and right now they are taller than my 255/85/16s by about an inch (but they have very little tread left)
Tread depth is right a 19/32.
I hope I like these as well as the original ST, which proved to be an excellent and true all terrain tire.....
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jim65wagon/5616844087/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jim65wagon/5617425180/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jim65wagon/5617427376/
There they are, fresh off the truck. Coopers new S/T Maxx in a 285/75r16.
First impression:
They are huge! Well, compared to the 255/85/16s they look huge.....I'm sure they'll fit, snugly.
They are heavy! 61 lbs each!
I'm digging the tread pattern, the siping, and the ArmorTec sidewall (which the ST did not have)
Measurements:
Tread is about 9 1/4" wide (that's about 2" wider than the 255/85/16 ST)
Total height is actually 32.5" and right now they are taller than my 255/85/16s by about an inch (but they have very little tread left)
Tread depth is right a 19/32.
I hope I like these as well as the original ST, which proved to be an excellent and true all terrain tire.....
Last edited by jim65wagon; 04-15-2011 at 01:35 AM.
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: shelton,wa
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thanks, i think i want tall and skinny
so im allways trolling for info on odd, tall and skinny(the 255s) as compared to others
i'll be interested to here which one you like better (size wise)
so im allways trolling for info on odd, tall and skinny(the 255s) as compared to others
i'll be interested to here which one you like better (size wise)
#5
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: King George,VA
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
before
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jim65wagon/3090277886/
after
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jim65wagon/5619835863/
Right now I'm not sure yet. These (with a whole 50 miles on them now) ride very nice and are quieter than the original ST. If they offroad as well as the original I will be quite happy - and if I can get 40,000 to 50,000 out of them!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jim65wagon/3090277886/
after
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jim65wagon/5619835863/
Right now I'm not sure yet. These (with a whole 50 miles on them now) ride very nice and are quieter than the original ST. If they offroad as well as the original I will be quite happy - and if I can get 40,000 to 50,000 out of them!
Trending Topics
#9
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
^i've seen the old STs on a couple plow trucks, so i'd assume they're pretty good. slap some studs on those bad boys and you'd be good to go!
looks like a lot of the tire manufacturers are finally starting to put out more aggressive ATs. Had these come out earlier I probably would have gotten them over the DuraTracs I'm running on my Cruiser.
looks like a lot of the tire manufacturers are finally starting to put out more aggressive ATs. Had these come out earlier I probably would have gotten them over the DuraTracs I'm running on my Cruiser.
#10
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: King George,VA
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought they did very well in the snow we get here in VA. Last year we had 8" of snow and the truck climbed out of our steep driveway easily, toured plowed and unplowed backroads without any issues or drama. I liked thema lot more than the BFG ATs I had before I got the ST's
#13
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: King George,VA
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Agreed! The old style ST's were OK until about half tread. I siped them after about 25,000 miles. The verdict is still out on these new ones, so far they seem better in the rain as new tires, but they don't have a lot of siping and I'll probably add more as the tires wear....
#14
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: King George,VA
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
a little update. The Maxxs are wearing very well and evenly across. It's looking like I should be able to get 50,000 out of these if they continue to wear at the same rate they are now.
On the sand at Cape Lookout National Seashore they did very well. The gravel roads of the Green Mountain National Forest in Vermont were handled nicely, nothing squirrelly in the curves. And the torrential rain has given a couple of opportunities to test their water shedding abilities (very good) No hydroplaning at speed, even in the standing water on the road....
Now if I could jusy get them muddier than I was able to at Rapidan WMU....
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jim65wagon/6092830584/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jim65wagon/5734144931/
On the sand at Cape Lookout National Seashore they did very well. The gravel roads of the Green Mountain National Forest in Vermont were handled nicely, nothing squirrelly in the curves. And the torrential rain has given a couple of opportunities to test their water shedding abilities (very good) No hydroplaning at speed, even in the standing water on the road....
Now if I could jusy get them muddier than I was able to at Rapidan WMU....
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jim65wagon/6092830584/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jim65wagon/5734144931/
#15
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: King George,VA
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just a quick update: I haven't had them off road lately, last time was the trip to PA for junior deer season with my daughter. There is a steep winding track that was muddy and the Maxx's just climb right up.
On road I have no complaints. The tires continue to run nice and quiet.
I don't have any issues with them in the rain, like the original ST the rears will spin a bit (or a lot) if your foot gets too heavy, or the tires have too much air pressure, or the road still has that early rain oil layer on it - or a combination of all the above.
They seem to be hydroplane resistant, hitting standing water at speed they shed water quickly enough to maintain control and give you a chance to go - whew! that coulda been worse!
They do seem to be wearing like iron. Original tread depth was (measured by me) 19/32" after 13,000 miles of mostly road (but enough sand, gravel and mud to like these treads) they've worn down to 16/32. Math time peeps.
19/32 - 16/32 = 3/32
175,000 miles - 162000 miles = 13,000 miles
13,000 / 3 = 4333 miles per 1/32 of tread wear!
.
let's extrapolate!
if you drive these tires to their legal limit (3/32) that gives you a potential of 69,328 miles. [19 - 3 = 16/32; 16 x 4333 = 69,328]
even if you only like to use half the tread life (9.5/32) that gives you a potential of 41,163 miles. [19 / 2 = 9.5; 9.5 x 4333 = 41,163]
.
That's off road tire life I can live with!
On road I have no complaints. The tires continue to run nice and quiet.
I don't have any issues with them in the rain, like the original ST the rears will spin a bit (or a lot) if your foot gets too heavy, or the tires have too much air pressure, or the road still has that early rain oil layer on it - or a combination of all the above.
They seem to be hydroplane resistant, hitting standing water at speed they shed water quickly enough to maintain control and give you a chance to go - whew! that coulda been worse!
They do seem to be wearing like iron. Original tread depth was (measured by me) 19/32" after 13,000 miles of mostly road (but enough sand, gravel and mud to like these treads) they've worn down to 16/32. Math time peeps.
19/32 - 16/32 = 3/32
175,000 miles - 162000 miles = 13,000 miles
13,000 / 3 = 4333 miles per 1/32 of tread wear!
.
let's extrapolate!
if you drive these tires to their legal limit (3/32) that gives you a potential of 69,328 miles. [19 - 3 = 16/32; 16 x 4333 = 69,328]
even if you only like to use half the tread life (9.5/32) that gives you a potential of 41,163 miles. [19 / 2 = 9.5; 9.5 x 4333 = 41,163]
.
That's off road tire life I can live with!
#18
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: King George,VA
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm still digging the Maxx's and have about 24,000 miles on them. Still on track for an easy 50,000 miles and wearing evenly.
#19
Registered User
I have to say they have to be the best street all terrain tire I have ever seen. I know a Cooper distributor and the company I used to work for has them on all their trucks. I run nothing but Cooper on my cars. I even have Zeons on my Ascender. Great looking tire and I'm glad they work well for you. When you're ready for a new set call my friends over at Tires To Go they can ship and get you a really nice deal
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
junder28
Buying & Selling Advice - Feeler/Gauging Interest
25
06-21-2016 06:24 PM
oly884
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
12
07-24-2005 03:55 PM
HaveBlue
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
5
09-22-2004 07:22 AM