95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

Would a 3 5/16 backspaced wheel stickout to the point of looking goofy?How bout 3.75?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 2, 2004 | 08:35 AM
  #1  
KSTacoma's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Would a 3 5/16 backspaced wheel stickout to the point of looking goofy?How bout 3.75?

Im still debating wheels etc. and i want something for my 98 tacoma that will be as close in as possible while allowing me to run 33x12.5's. I've heard of people running 3.75" backspacing with a lil rubbing but i dont know. I dont want my truck to look, excuse my racism. but all mexican'd out w/the stuck out wheels real far etc. What's the best backspacing i could do w/o achieving this look lol
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2004 | 09:22 AM
  #2  
BajaRunner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,122
Likes: 6
From: 5th Gen San Diegan, California
I like when truck tires stick out a little bit...it looks good. I dont think that backspacing would make it look all vato style at all.

I think it looks weird if your truck/car is LOWERED and then has the stuck out wheels. But, if its on a truck thats higher or stock, it makes it look more aggressive...
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2004 | 09:30 AM
  #3  
Gene's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
From: Pocatello, ID
I am running 33x12.50x15 with 3.75 backspacing on my 99 Tacoma. It looks nice. But I do get a lot of rub at full turn or stuff.





Reply
Old Jun 2, 2004 | 09:58 AM
  #4  
Mallrat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Originally Posted by KSTacoma
Im still debating wheels etc. and i want something for my 98 tacoma that will be as close in as possible while allowing me to run 33x12.5's. I've heard of people running 3.75" backspacing with a lil rubbing but i dont know. I dont want my truck to look, excuse my racism. but all mexican'd out w/the stuck out wheels real far etc. What's the best backspacing i could do w/o achieving this look lol

I had 33x12.50 SSRs on a MTII with 3 3/16 backspacing.. I thought it looked kickass and it didnt rub at all!

Reply
Old Jun 2, 2004 | 10:13 AM
  #5  
KSTacoma's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
GOD DAMN YOUR GUY'S RIDES ARE BADASS! So, Dread, i'd stick out about a half inch more than yours? If so i'll probably need some fender flares to make it look decent like yours does. MALLRAT! yours is ˟˟˟˟˟ing awesome! Do you have anymore pics, especially one straight on or straight behind so i can get a better idea?
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2004 | 10:26 AM
  #6  
Mallrat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Originally Posted by KSTacoma
GOD DAMN YOUR GUY'S RIDES ARE BADASS! So, Dread, i'd stick out about a half inch more than yours? If so i'll probably need some fender flares to make it look decent like yours does. MALLRAT! yours is ˟˟˟˟˟ing awesome! Do you have anymore pics, especially one straight on or straight behind so i can get a better idea?

ASK AND YE SHALL RECEIVE... HERE'S A BUNCH OF IT RIGHT AFTER LIFT INSTALL.

http://community.webshots.com/album/33420069JDMjzJ/1
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2004 | 11:44 AM
  #7  
Gene's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
From: Pocatello, ID
Originally Posted by KSTacoma
So, Dread, i'd stick out about a half inch more than yours? If so i'll probably need some fender flares to make it look decent like yours does.
Yeah, you'll need some fender flares - as do I. I think I am borderline legal, which is not where I want to be! With the BFG/MT, only the outer lug is exposed. Someone once told me that was legal, but I don't know the law.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2004 | 12:25 PM
  #8  
keisur's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
just be careful, with that little of a backspace the radius the wheel turns about the ball joints is longer so you may rub at full turn.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 04:12 PM
  #9  
ravencr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,697
Likes: 0
From: Deep Gap, NC
I'm debating what to do about wheels too right now, and backspacing for 315/75R16's. Does anyone have any solid evidence on what backspacing I can run to clear stock upper a-arms and limited fender flares at the same time?

Chris
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 10:36 PM
  #10  
Poor A$$ Stock '93's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Prince George, BC, Canada 'eh
the law says that if any part of the contact patch of the tread sticks out past the fender then you are in violation. I am running 33x12.5s on -19mm offset (equals a bit less then 3.5" backspacing I think) and on my '93 I stick out about 2" on each wheel well. Not exactly legal but I also trimmed the fenders so finding flares that fit without spending a fortune on bushwackers is hard to do...
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2004 | 09:13 AM
  #11  
KSTacoma's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
hey do u have pics^?
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2004 | 10:28 AM
  #12  
keisur's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by Poor A$$ Stock '93
the law says that if any part of the contact patch of the tread sticks out past the fender then you are in violation. I am running 33x12.5s on -19mm offset (equals a bit less then 3.5" backspacing I think) and on my '93 I stick out about 2" on each wheel well. Not exactly legal but I also trimmed the fenders so finding flares that fit without spending a fortune on bushwackers is hard to do...
I guess I'm a law breaker then.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2004 | 06:35 PM
  #13  
Poor A$$ Stock '93's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Prince George, BC, Canada 'eh
Originally Posted by KSTacoma
hey do u have pics^?
sorry not as yet. I will work on it...
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2004 | 05:09 PM
  #14  
Cebby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
OK, here's the pics. MT Classic II's 15x8 with a stated BS of 3 5/16. The BS actually measures about 3 5/8 to 3 3/4. The stock 15x7 alloys measured 4 1/4 BS. So, at the wheel, I'm 1.5" wider per side. I'm running Bushwacker extend a flares to stay legal.

















Reply
Old Jun 8, 2004 | 05:11 PM
  #15  
Cebby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
OK, why the hell aren't all my pics coming up? I'm linking to Monty in all of the pics and have not had an issue before.

Reply
Old Jun 9, 2004 | 01:54 AM
  #16  
ravencr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,697
Likes: 0
From: Deep Gap, NC
Originally Posted by Cebby
OK, why the hell aren't all my pics coming up? I'm linking to Monty in all of the pics and have not had an issue before.

Put [IMG].........[/IMG] in the beginning and end of your link, and they'll work.

Chris

P.S. Are all the stcok wheels the 4 1/4" backspacing that you mention regardless of year on the 4runners?
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2004 | 03:46 AM
  #17  
Cebby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by ravencr
Put [IMG].........[/IMG] in the beginning and end of your link, and they'll work.
thanks Mr. Obvious

I have the tags on every link. What gives?
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2004 | 06:16 AM
  #18  
KSTacoma's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
DAMN CEBBY NNNICE!! That looks ˟˟˟˟˟ing awesome!!!!!!
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2004 | 06:06 PM
  #19  
ravencr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,697
Likes: 0
From: Deep Gap, NC
Originally Posted by Cebby
thanks Mr. Obvious

I have the tags on every link. What gives?
Well, unfortunately, if you had been nice about it, I would have helped, but oh well!

Chris
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2004 | 06:31 PM
  #20  
Cebby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by ravencr
Well, unfortunately, if you had been nice about it, I would have helped, but oh well!

Chris
Gee, someone's awfully sensative....
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:47 PM.