95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

Wall Street Journal article about 4runner

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 12:43 PM
  #1  
SuckaMC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: MI
Wall Street Journal article about 4runner

Anyone read article about rollover problems with SUV's today? It centers on the 2000 4runner. A buddy just told me about it, but i havent got the chance to get a copy.


Will
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 01:01 PM
  #2  
rwmorrisonjr's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,991
Likes: 0
From: Home: Aurora, CO; Work: The People's Republic of Denver
Do you have a link for those of us who don't get the WSJ? What section of the printed paper is it in?
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 01:12 PM
  #3  
rwmorrisonjr's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,991
Likes: 0
From: Home: Aurora, CO; Work: The People's Republic of Denver
Do you have a link for those of us who don't get the WSJ? What section of the printed paper is it in?
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 01:58 PM
  #4  
Darren's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
That would tell me that WSJ didn't do their homework if they chose to cover a 2000 model, assuming they were attempting to give a negative slant.

They should've covered a '96-'99 as those are a little higher. I'm curious what was said about the 4Runner, though. Does anyone have a subscription who could post the related text, or at least summarize it?

Sounds like a worthless article anyway as that topic has been beat to death for the past 10+ years. I think we all know you don't drive them like cars.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 02:14 PM
  #5  
AUJWE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I caught the tail end of a story on one of the national news channels last night about SUVs and roll-overs. They were using a 3rd gen 4Runner. It was about new standards and what not to help them(I didn't catch who was doing the story) better study roll-overs. Sorry this is so vague but maybe it had something to do with the WSJ story. It just caught my attention on the tv when I saw a 4Runner on two wheels with the tires smoking.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 02:21 PM
  #6  
99Limited's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
The article is in today's issue(10/08/03) on the front page of the Personal Journal section. Basically it said that the '03 4Runner performed better during high speed lane change maneuvers than the '00 model because the newer model includes stability systems not found on the older truck. It also said the '03 model has a lower CG, longer wheelbase and wider track which contributes to better stability.

The front page of the section has a picture of the '00 model equipped with outriggers. The picture shows the truck with the 2 right tires about 1 foot off the ground.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 02:24 PM
  #7  
FirstToy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 1
From: Southern California
I saw it on TV too. It's basically a B.S. story showing how dangerous older 2000 4Runner was and how the new one is so much better.

Toyota got nailed for the Tacoma being rated as one of the worst in rollover recently so I think it's a matter of Toyota interested in advertising their improvements in rollover and sensationalist journalists looking for an easy story.

This issue isn't going away and every new suv from now on will be lower because of this ignorant mentality.

Last edited by FirstToy; Oct 8, 2003 at 02:25 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flying91
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
45
Apr 11, 2024 04:39 PM
djpg2000
Tires & Wheels
11
Nov 11, 2020 04:56 AM
Sleaker
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
17
Aug 26, 2020 06:03 AM
BeMiceElf
Misc Stuff (Vehicle Related)
7
Oct 10, 2015 09:40 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:52 AM.