Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

Blown 94 v6 4runner, stick to 3.0 or swap to 3.4?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 13, 2009 | 09:22 AM
  #1  
yota master's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Blown 94 v6 4runner, stick to 3.0 or swap to 3.4?

Ok so i just bought a 94 v6 3.slow manual 4runner with a

rod knocking so instinctively i ran the motor into the ground

now im ready for a new one. I also have a 98 tacoma i

wrecked with a 3.4 automatic and my question is- what all

would i need to swap my 3.4 into the 4 runner? Or does

anyone have a 3.0 they wanna sell for a reasonable price?
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 09:49 AM
  #2  
UKMyers's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,267
Likes: 1
From: Solano Co, CA Originally a North Idaho Hick
All the tech you ever wanted to know about this swap http://www.offroadsolutions.com/34conversion_auto.html

If you already have a 3.4 motor and tranny I would not think twice about sticking a 3.slow back in it.
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 09:51 AM
  #3  
scuba's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 11,338
Likes: 120
From: Austin, Texas
3.4


Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 10:23 AM
  #4  
904_runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,870
Likes: 4
From: Chico, California
another thing to think about is smog laws in your area.

i did a 3.4 swap and love it, im sure you will too!
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 10:26 AM
  #5  
Kiroshu's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,747
Likes: 3
From: NC
up to you, if ya want a good project go to the 3.4, but if you want to do things the right way go OEM....
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 02:57 PM
  #6  
RobD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,243
Likes: 5
From: Calgary, AB
Originally Posted by Kiroshu
up to you, if ya want a good project go to the 3.4, but if you want to do things the right way go OEM....
And by that, he means less power and worse fuel economy...

Sheesh, go with the 3.4. Did mine back in August of '07 and haven't regretted it once.

http://www.andrewzook.com/content/view/22/48/

One of the best resources I've found on it.
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 02:59 PM
  #7  
gatorblue92's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Gulf Coast, MS
you have everything you need for the 3.4 so i say do it
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 03:07 PM
  #8  
vital22re's Avatar
totally a bro
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,158
Likes: 46
From: kick yer face
3.0 its the tits man screw the 3.4!!!! all original baby!!!! nah i'm kiddin. 3.4 is in my opinion a far superior set up than the 3.0. I did mine early this year and its really been great having a motor that feels reliable, gets better gas mileage, gives ya that bump in power, and basically bolts up.
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 03:22 PM
  #9  
wii_tarded's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 2
From: Knoxville, TN
The main reason I'd stick with the 3.0 is the difficulty in finding 3.4 parts. If you have the 3.4 with trans, ecu, and drivelines, do the swap.
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 09:15 AM
  #10  
yota master's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
ive been looking around and i dont think i can even use this motor since its from an automatic tranny truck
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 09:54 AM
  #11  
scuba's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 11,338
Likes: 120
From: Austin, Texas
You'll just have to jumper a couple wires or get a manual tranny ecu..
I have no experience on the swap thats just what I remember reading..

Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 09:59 AM
  #12  
vandert's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 297
Likes: 2
From: Ringgold Ga/Chattanooga Tn
Of course you can man, are you serious. Do the 3.4 I'm planning on it soon as well, about to do the bodylift in prep for it
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 10:00 AM
  #13  
Tacoclimber's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,659
Likes: 0
From: Between a rock and a hard place, AZ
Originally Posted by Kiroshu
up to you, if ya want a good project go to the 3.4, but if you want to do things the right way go OEM....
Says the guy without a 3.4.


Swapping the 3.4 and tranny into your Runner can be done. Whether or not the 3.4 will mate to the manual already attached to your Runner, I don't know.

The site the UKMeyers clipped is teh hawt when it comes to swapparoonies.
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 01:01 PM
  #14  
Justinlhc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
How much better is the mileage on the 3.4? Maybe there have been problems with the ones I've driven, but I'm not impressed with the power of the 3.4 compared to my 3.0. I have a few minor mods done to my 3.0, but I'd put it against any of the 3.4's I've driven.

I know the 3.4 is a fairly simple swap, but if I were to swap any motor I'd be looking for something with a tad bit more power than the 3.4. Just my opinion though.
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 01:37 PM
  #15  
yota master's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
well i know about the wiring of the ecu from automatic to maual tranny but i also heard the 3.4 set up for an automatic cant hold a pilot bearing to be able to hook to a manual tranny, does anyone know anything about this?? does anyone know of what year/ models or whatever will hook up to a manual tranny?
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 02:06 PM
  #16  
Tacoclimber's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,659
Likes: 0
From: Between a rock and a hard place, AZ
Originally Posted by Justinlhc
How much better is the mileage on the 3.4? Maybe there have been problems with the ones I've driven, but I'm not impressed with the power of the 3.4 compared to my 3.0. I have a few minor mods done to my 3.0, but I'd put it against any of the 3.4's I've driven.

I know the 3.4 is a fairly simple swap, but if I were to swap any motor I'd be looking for something with a tad bit more power than the 3.4. Just my opinion though.
With all due respect, the 3.0 is the closest thing to a lemon motor that Toyota ever put out. The head gasket issue is almost legendary, and while I'm sure your 3.0 runs good, I don't know that I'd be so bold to say that it can go up against a 3.4. The 3.4 are darn near bulletproof, have solid aftermarket support, and can be yoked to above 300 rwhp. (With supercharger and fuel mods, of course).

I think for power AND longevity AND durability... the 3.4 wins, hands down.
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 02:30 PM
  #17  
Justinlhc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Tacoclimber
With all due respect, the 3.0 is the closest thing to a lemon motor that Toyota ever put out. The head gasket issue is almost legendary, and while I'm sure your 3.0 runs good, I don't know that I'd be so bold to say that it can go up against a 3.4. The 3.4 are darn near bulletproof, have solid aftermarket support, and can be yoked to above 300 rwhp. (With supercharger and fuel mods, of course).

I think for power AND longevity AND durability... the 3.4 wins, hands down.

How long do they last for? Maybe the ones I've driven had some sort of issue? They certainly don't blow my 3.0 away, not anything that would make me want to swap motors that's for damn sure.

From what I can find they only have about ~40 more hp. I just can't justify swapping motors for such a small gain.
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 02:43 PM
  #18  
Tacoclimber's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,659
Likes: 0
From: Between a rock and a hard place, AZ
Originally Posted by Justinlhc
How long do they last for? Maybe the ones I've driven had some sort of issue? They certainly don't blow my 3.0 away, not anything that would make me want to swap motors that's for damn sure.

From what I can find they only have about ~40 more hp. I just can't justify swapping motors for such a small gain.
So you're saying you've raced a few 3.4's?
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 03:24 PM
  #19  
vital22re's Avatar
totally a bro
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,158
Likes: 46
From: kick yer face
all the talk of auto 3.4's not having a pilot bearing hole is crap!!! they have them 904_runner has an auto 3.4 in a manual runner with the auto ecu.
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 05:32 PM
  #20  
Justinlhc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Tacoclimber
So you're saying you've raced a few 3.4's?

Haha, no no I've just driven a few. Maybe I just expected more, I dunno? They didn't feel very impressive to me is all I'm saying. I'll see if I can line my buddies 3.4 T100 up with my 3.0 4Runner this weekend. I'm pretty sure my 4Runner would take his T100, but maybe I'm crazy.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:11 AM.