Tires & Wheels Anything about tires and wheels

Firestone Destination MT Review

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 19, 2008 | 08:48 AM
  #1  
johnsenpa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: Vesuvius, Virginia / Ottawa, Illinois
Firestone Destination MT Review

I have been around Bridgestone/Firestone since I was born and my dad has worked for them for almost 40 years. For years I have scanning offroad magazines oogling at the evolution of the offroad tires and have been often questioning why Firestone didn't jump into this market.

Firestone makes impressive tires, whether they are for CART series racing, airplanes, or grandpa's old buick. Their tire technology is always leading in design for the given tire. I asked my dad why they never did off-road tires, and he thought at the time years ago was because it was just too small a market, but said the closest thing they do are wilderness tires for heavy equipment.

So, once I bought my 4runner two years ago, I had the dueller ATs from bridgestone. Good all around street tire that wears well. Once they balded down I checked once again and to my amazement Firestone had come out with the Destination Maximum Traction (MT) ... not Mud Terrain. I laughed to myself when I saw Maximum Traction because I knew Firestone had taken every condition into consideration with their design. I have had mine on for 30,000 miles within the past year and a couple months. I have drove a lot of highway (illinois to virginia many times and out to kansas and colorado and back). The wear on the tread is unbelievable. I have much more than I thought I would when I bought them. They are extremely grippy and muck through clayey mud, soup mud, snow, sleet and rain. The come prepinned for any occasion where there might be some light morning ice on the road I just pin it in a few spots on each tire. (Not sure if that helps but when I have slipped like a puppy on ice with the dueller's on a few occations, I just get real leary about some roads. The water displacement is incredible. Most of your might be like duh its an MT. Well when your driving on a rainy night down a street you are unfamiliar with and you hit a pool of water I have hydroplaned a number of times with my buddy's Mickey Thompsons. Yes they had the same amount of wear.

With the Destination MT's I have yet to get separation from the tires and the pavement in that situation. Overall on pavement they are great because their aggressive tread lugs are made up of a respectively softer rubber that wears real well. This being said, when I was out in colorado doing runs with colorado yotatechers at St. Vrain, Corkscrew gulch, Black bear pass, Lead King Basin Rd.,...etc. They handled excellent. Through all types of rock and terrain. The most notable was on the ascent up slick wet shale at lead king basin, I didn't slip into the ruts or off the path down the side of a rut ( more crucial to do then it sounds, but if you are then when wet, you'll know). Also at Mid St. Vrain or it might have been the Bunce school Rd. portion that we did before St. Vrain, but whatever... There was a time where it was a steep ascent up some large flat pieces of sharp shale, that you had to just burn up and spin your way up eating dust and not losing any momentum in your travel. When I got to the top I had a few gouge marks and chips out of my lugs, and had shaved the side of one of my sidewalls. This is because the tire is a softer rubber. Granted if you are a hardcore rock crawler you are not going to get destination MTs, rather you are going to get some serious crawler tires which have harder rubber and more tough sidewalls meant for grinding rocks. The Destination MTs still have given me no trouble whatsoever. I have the 31x10.5's.

There is no doubt about it that these tires will take me anywhere that I want to go or that I can go. You will definitely not be disappointed in this choice of tire. I just wish they made 33x9.5's!!!

Last edited by rocket; May 20, 2008 at 12:03 AM. Reason: paragraphs
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 09:41 AM
  #2  
CJM's Avatar
CJM
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,940
Likes: 2
From: Central NJ
I been tossing up this tire for my uses. Glad to hear they are working very good for you.

For me its a toss up between needing a max traction tire vs a good at like the destination AT.
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 02:44 PM
  #3  
Bear80's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio TX
Whoa, paragraphs, breaks something. That is a mess to read.
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 10:01 PM
  #4  
Matt16's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 5
Thanks for the writeup. I'm trying to decide between this and the Cooper S/T.
Reply
Old May 20, 2008 | 03:05 AM
  #5  
armymike138's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
I have the Firestone Destination MTs as well. At first I was kind of shying away from them because of the price, but then I said F it and bought them anyway. Needless to say, I could not have been more happy with them. The only time I have had any problems with them was when I was wheeling up in the Pine Barrens up in Jersey, and that was because I was digging way too much in the sand. But all in all I could not be more happy with my tires.
Reply
Old May 20, 2008 | 04:35 AM
  #6  
INFINITY's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 1
From: Show Low, AZ
good to hear they have not chunked out like most of the ones i see here in AZ
Reply
Old May 20, 2008 | 10:59 AM
  #7  
Matt16's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 5
How do they do on straight up ice?
Reply
Old May 20, 2008 | 11:39 AM
  #8  
norcalsvx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,122
Likes: 2
From: GRASS valley, CA
yea i used to sell a lot of them when i was at the tire store and my bro runs them on his 4runner they work great for him.
Reply
Old May 20, 2008 | 12:44 PM
  #9  
javadoody's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
From: colorado
Originally Posted by Matt16
How do they do on straight up ice?
i'm running the destination a/t's, and they're like sticking your tongue on the frozen chain link fence--like glue. i'm been sitting at a dead stop on a slight bank curve on sheet ice on I70 at the tunnel and trucks all around are breaking free and sliding. i just walk up the hill as they "move over".
outstanding in the snow. tire rack reviews sold me on the product.

but, i don't know the difference between these a/t and the m/t.
Reply
Old May 21, 2008 | 09:44 AM
  #10  
94svt50's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: KENTUCKY
I have had the Destination M/Ts for about 10k miles and have also been very happy with them. Much better then the Dunlop mud rovers I replaced, better on road ride and much better wet traction and stopping ability. Also, no serious vibration issues like the mud rovers. The destination M/T have done well in snow while pulling a trailer, but due to close spacing between tread they tend to clog in the real thick kentucky clay.
Over all I would definitly buy again, They also show little to no wear in 10k miles.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2008 | 06:17 PM
  #11  
98LimitedCustomized's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
I have 285/75/16 Firestone MT's and they are the worst tire I've ever used on ice/packed snow/ any snow for that matter. The lack of siiping and width(in my case) make for a worthless 4x4. I'm putting my 235/85 Nokians back on ASAP.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 02:40 PM
  #12  
crawldaddy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Logan, Utah
I bought a set and the tread started to chunk badly. I had complete lugs ripping off in the center of the tire down to the steel belts. They saw mostly street miles with light dirt roads in an 02 dodge dakota. All of this happened with in the first 10000 miles. Firestone said that there is nothing wrong with the tire, but then warned me not to drive them with the steel showing. I'll never buy these again.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 06:43 AM
  #13  
fyreandwater's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Durango, CO
I love my M/T's! Fantastic on slickrock in Moab. I have about 10,000 miles on mine and they have worn great. I wish they made them in a 35x12.50.
Reply
Old May 1, 2009 | 11:55 AM
  #14  
bigtrucknwheels's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,336
Likes: 2
From: Harrisburg, PA
anyone else with a lot of miles on theirs willing to give a review?

I need to be able to navigate snow with relative ease, as it is the number one reason I own a 4x4, next to being able to tackle anything I want to drive into/onto/over. Some mud, some dirt, and def. some snow.

anyone?
Reply
Old May 1, 2009 | 06:29 PM
  #15  
SnowRunner98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: Evanston, wy
i'm rocking the dick cepek fun co II's and they are excellent. Cooper st's are on all off our work trucks and they see everything, snow, mud, tons of highway miles, you name it. darn good tire. can't say about the fire stone.
Reply
Old May 4, 2009 | 05:48 AM
  #16  
Bandit Runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 354
Likes: 10
From: Stevensville, MI
I've got about 25,000 miles on mine so far, and they still have at least half the tread depth left. They are great in mud, dirt, sand, and deep snow, but not so much on ice. Also, very quiet on the road. Great tires!
Reply
Old May 6, 2009 | 01:29 AM
  #17  
Matt16's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 5
How much MPG loss did you experience with Destination MTs? (and what tire did you come from?)
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
myotherrideisayoshi
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
1
Sep 29, 2015 05:41 AM
charlie_fong
General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related)
0
Sep 27, 2015 10:06 PM
drifttruck
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
8
Sep 18, 2015 11:19 AM
larrys93pickup
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
6
Sep 17, 2015 07:05 PM
carid
Vendor Advertising
0
Sep 10, 2015 06:11 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:47 AM.