FJ Cruiser 2007 & on

MSN auto reviews the FJ cruiser

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 04:03 PM
  #1  
HOJU's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,274
Likes: 0
From: UTAH
MSN auto reviews the FJ cruiser

Goes on sale in March according to the report Article
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 04:29 PM
  #2  
Funrunner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 0
I would love one of those in my driveway, parked next to my Runner. I'd be hesitant to get a first year design though, before the bugs got worked out.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 09:57 AM
  #3  
Sac State's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
From: Piedmont, North Carolina
My only complaint are the nipple tail-lights.

Notice how the FJ is sloped (raked) like the new 4Runner?

What is up with nose down ideology?

Last edited by Sac State; Jan 6, 2006 at 10:43 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2006 | 04:10 PM
  #4  
Flamedx4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,291
Likes: 0
From: 100 miles offshore as much as possible, & Springfield Oregon USA
Cuz everybody griped that old ones were down in back...
Virtually all new SUVs and all new trucks in recent years come that way (high in back.)
The combination of the ability to carry loads yet have a nice ride when unloaded (as well as loaded) is why. Longer rear springs (either coil or leaf) can start off initially smooth, then gradually get stiffer as they compress. If it started off level it would bottom out too easily.
At least it won't sag in the rear over time like the old tech did...
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 10:43 AM
  #5  
Sac State's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
From: Piedmont, North Carolina
Come on, your telling me that people complained about the sag, so Toyota went overboard in the other direction? I think Tahoes, Suburbans, Cherokees, Pathfinders, Xterra's, etc. all ride smoothly unladen, and they don';t look like they are constipated driving down the road. Make it level like every other vehicle, it looks ridiculous raised up and not level. Kinda like the engineers just popped a stiff spring in there and called it a day.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 11:36 AM
  #6  
JHupp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
said it before, and Ill say it agin, this thing is fugly, would never buy one no matter how capable they were off-road, and no matter how cheap they were, I hate the look of it. It looks too much like a plastic tonka toy
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
suppra87
Tires & Wheels
9
Jul 15, 2021 05:15 PM
1uzRunner
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
63
Nov 10, 2018 03:58 PM
an1mal_69
Offroad Tech
2
Sep 8, 2015 09:40 AM
May-39
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
1
Sep 6, 2015 01:05 PM
justdifferentials
Vendors Build-Ups (Build-Up Section)
0
Sep 5, 2015 06:52 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:57 PM.