General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related) If topic doesn't apply to Toyotas whatsoever, it should be in Off Topic
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

What is the diff? W 56, R150, 151

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 13, 2006 | 07:09 AM
  #1  
Schooler's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Tejas
What is the diff? W 56, R150, 151

I have a 93 a/t and planning on doing a m/t swap. I have found some info about these transmissions but I am stumped as to the details about them. What are the differences and similarities? Which one should I be looking for?

Also, There is someone local who has a m/t (don't know what type yet) from a 4 cyl but he says I would need a bell housing for a 6 cyl for it to work with my truck. Then I read a post about a guy who did a a/t to m/t swap and he did not need to replace the bell housing at all. Can anyone who knows what they are talking about shed light on this subject?

Last edited by Schooler; Jan 13, 2006 at 07:12 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2006 | 08:17 AM
  #2  
Flamedx4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,291
Likes: 0
From: 100 miles offshore as much as possible, & Springfield Oregon USA
Try here:
http://www.4x4wire.com/toyota/faq/parts/
and here:
http://www.marlincrawler.com/htm/transmission/hilux.htm
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2006 | 08:40 AM
  #3  
Schooler's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Tejas
Hmm.. I did look previously at Marlin site but somehow missed that information. Thanks.

I believe this means that the R150F is the most compatible 5 speed with the 93 3.0. What about gear ratio?
"We can rebuild the stock 3.83 first gear with a 4.31 first gear from a R151F turbo tranny
First gear ratio is 13% lower than stock ratio (4.31 vs. 3.83).
Cost $385."
Does this mean more tourque or lower end tourque? (Or maybe it has nothing to do with tourque at all) What I'm asking is, what would I experience with a 13% lower gear ratio than stock?
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2006 | 09:13 AM
  #4  
Radyota's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
From: St. Cloud, MN
More torque and higher engine rpm's in first gear, easier to start moving from a dead stop, especially on an uphill or while towing.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2006 | 09:30 AM
  #5  
rockota's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
If you have a V6, you can only put a 150 or 151 behind your engine. There is no bellhousing to adapt a W56/G52 to your engine. There is a bellhousing to adapt a 150/151 to a 22rx engine that came factory behind the 22ret.

The 151 is Toyota's best tranny, IMHO. Lower first gear, 23 spline, no adapter needed to mate to a 4-cyl, gear driven tcase.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2006 | 12:02 PM
  #6  
Flamedx4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,291
Likes: 0
From: 100 miles offshore as much as possible, & Springfield Oregon USA
Originally Posted by Schooler
I have a 93 a/t and planning on doing a m/t swap. I have found some info about these transmissions but I am stumped as to the details about them. What are the differences and similarities? Which one should I be looking for?

Also, There is someone local who has a m/t (don't know what type yet) from a 4 cyl but he says I would need a bell housing for a 6 cyl for it to work with my truck. Then I read a post about a guy who did a a/t to m/t swap and he did not need to replace the bell housing at all. Can anyone who knows what they are talking about shed light on this subject?
Also, I wouldn't believe that bit about not replacing the bellhousing.
The bellhousing for a manual if different, it has to have provision for the clutch for example.
I suspect what he said was that he didn't swap bellhousings from one trans to the other - he probably took out the auto w/bellhousing and put in the manual w/bellhousing.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2006 | 05:10 AM
  #7  
Schooler's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Tejas
Originally Posted by Flamedx4
Also, I wouldn't believe that bit about not replacing the bellhousing.
The bellhousing for a manual if different, it has to have provision for the clutch for example.
I suspect what he said was that he didn't swap bellhousings from one trans to the other - he probably took out the auto w/bellhousing and put in the manual w/bellhousing.
Yes that would make more sense. You have answered my questions.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
live4soccer7
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners
3
May 11, 2016 06:52 PM
Badlander
Misc Stuff (Vehicle Related)
3
Oct 10, 2015 08:05 PM
Odin
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
3
Sep 26, 2015 06:56 PM
toyotasaurus
Vehicles - Trailers (Complete)
0
Sep 24, 2015 03:30 PM
zz_denis
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
2
Sep 6, 2015 03:43 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:40 PM.