deckplate mod and gas mileage
#21
Contributing Member
Originally Posted by Cardesign
so have we concluded that it WILL NOT hurt gas mileage? I just fig increase of power meant more fuel consumption.
#22
Originally Posted by RockComa
So why not just leave the top of the airbox off instead of cutting and drilling
Dyno tests show 5HP with an open deckplate and I love the sound. For me, it's a no-brainer: The deckplate stays open unless I am crossing a stream or in serious dust. I guess you could say I am addicted to the sound at WOT.
#23
to be honest with you, I did the elbow mod, which is similar to the deckplate and I do notice an increase in fuel mileage. The reason behind this is because of improved airflow into the engine so the engine can run more efficient which means better fuel mileage. my rig can now go an additional 35 miles on full tank after the elbow mod. I did the ISR mod at the same time and the sound is wonderful.
#24
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Wilmington NC
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im missing something then. Here's my theory. You cut a deckplate so your filter is filtrating from the botom. What's different about opening the lid and letting it filter from the top. How a hole in the front makes a ram air setup as you say is beyond me
#25
I should clarify my wording as I have had to do before (my fault). A better couple of words would be "direct path" for the air getting into the airbox and up through the MAFS vs. air entering the top of the box (less filter area).
I have a 6" deckplate, taking up nearly the entire front of the airbox. More filter area is exposed - way more.
However, no matter the theory, you can't get around the inferior seal created by opening the box lid to the airbox. That would be my biggest concern.
I have a 6" deckplate, taking up nearly the entire front of the airbox. More filter area is exposed - way more.
However, no matter the theory, you can't get around the inferior seal created by opening the box lid to the airbox. That would be my biggest concern.
#27
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helena, Montana
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The lid seats the filter in place and holds it there with little clamps. when the lid is open the filter is not being held in place and you can have blow by of unfiltered air.
#28
Contributing Member
Originally Posted by RockComa
Im missing something then. Here's my theory. You cut a deckplate so your filter is filtrating from the botom. What's different about opening the lid and letting it filter from the top. How a hole in the front makes a ram air setup as you say is beyond me
#30
Contributing Member
Originally Posted by Cardesign
MTL...are you saying the elbow mod is no good?
....exactly how much is anyone's guess.
Last edited by MTL_4runner; 02-17-2005 at 08:29 AM.
#32
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rick F.
I installed the deckplate mod sometime in late 2002 and then the Amsoil filter about a week later. I ran the Amsoil filter for about 2 years and replaced it with a paper filter about 5 months ago, only because I was getting tired of the check engine light coming on and cleaning the MAF about every 3-6 months. Seems like no matter how much oil I squeeze out of the Amsoil filter I still get the MAF crapped up. I notice no performance nor mileage difference between the Amsoil vs. paper with the deckplate open.
I agree with Rick. My MAF had so much crap on it from the KN air filter, it made my gas mileage worse. I got tired of cleaning it and I now stick with the stock filter. If you you do use a Amsoil/KN filter, make sure you blow out as much oil as possible before you install it. It will save you time in the future.
#33
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The mod decreases the resistance in your air intake. However, the HP required to move the combustion air through your intake plenum is insignificant (<< 0.1 HP) and any improvement in the flow path would lead to insignificant gains in HP. You will not get a noticeable increase in gas mileage. However, as others have said, you may gain HP at higher throttle settings due to the potential for increased air flow.
#34
Contributing Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Mission, British Columbia
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I also went back to the stock filter, didn't notice any difference and the maf stays cleaner. I just have more faith in the paper filters.
The deckplate sound good though.
The deckplate sound good though.
#35
I have a K&N FIPK on my 01 Dub Cab Tacoma 3.4. While there wasn't a major difference in HP, some maybe...throttle response imroved & I picked up a few mpg. Worth it in my book. The only drawback is that it is alot louder than the stock box....not alot louder than the decplate mod though.
#36
Contributing Member
There are good dyno results on the air box mods, as well as links to filtration tests covering most of air filter brands discussed on this site. I didn't save the links, but my experience concurs with the accepted comparisons. We own 2 3.4Ls, and I have noticed similar hi rpm hp gains, but the deckplate sounds louder and is easily sealed for deep water. hp gains @ the wheels were similar. I sold both of our aftermarket filters and returned to OEM after I started watching for blowby. The stock airbox on your Toyota has a nice, soft rubber gasket that's designed to seal against a smooth, plastic frame (as in OEM). My obervations are that the greatest benefit overall is either airbox mod, and stick with the OEM air filter.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
he's gone
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
7
12-03-2019 07:08 AM
Tacoma1313
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
2
08-17-2015 05:44 PM
nonstop
General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related)
7
08-11-2015 09:26 AM