Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

Update on my HHO project

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-2008, 01:27 PM
  #41  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
anthony1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: torrance, CA.
Posts: 1,561
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It doesn't defied thermal energy cause he's just supplementing it to the gasoline. He'll use less gas...that's it.
Old 05-07-2008, 02:16 PM
  #42  
Registered User
 
Crawdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are there enough tinfoil hats to go around, everyone?

Curious to see what this yields, though I'm extremely skeptical. I would love to be proven wrong, though.
Old 05-07-2008, 02:32 PM
  #43  
Registered User
 
hmmwv15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Good 'ole Georgia
Posts: 1,801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm skeptical, but the way gas is I'm tempted to try anything! Best of luck and keep us posted! I think this is the first thread I will actually subscribe to.
Old 05-08-2008, 08:01 AM
  #44  
Registered User
 
hross14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by tc

I will statistically analyze the data and supply a confidence level of basically how sure you can be that this system TRULY resulted in a MPG difference.
TC--you are a statistician

It has been awile since i hav3e heard those phrases used. I have to say though--i am glad i dont have to do REAL stat samples anymore--judgemental is easier on the mental pars.

This would be crazy if a grass roots attempt like this actually makes things happen--i.e. 30mpg or ?? I am impresse with people that try and fail versus just failing from the get-go because they never try anything!!
Old 05-08-2008, 08:46 AM
  #45  
Registered User
 
infiltrator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Valencia, California
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
If what you are saying is right, and the government did shut this company down, I would be very very pissed at my country.

It is really funny to me that they made these things in the 70's!!!
Imagine if we started that kind of technology back then what would we have now! We would have full on hydrogen machines with little to no cost for fuel, and they would probably be freaking quick too!
Old 05-08-2008, 09:44 AM
  #46  
tc
Contributing Member
 
tc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Longmont, CO
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Actually, I'm a Quality Manager, but certified as a Six Sigma Black Belt for this kinda stuff, using data to make decisions.
Old 05-10-2008, 08:19 PM
  #47  
Registered User
 
eric_the_red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Excellent work Renofox, keep at it!

Look up Roy McAlister if you haven't heard of him. He is the president of the American Hydrogen Association. Search "engine fundamentals" on youtube. In a series of 10 vids, he starts off with IC engine basics 101, alot of which I am sure you and many people here on this great forum know, then starts to explain conversion to alternative fuels. He seems to think that we can use existing, already manufactured, IC engines more efficiently.

Anyway, I am researching this and if I find any useful info or anything that might help I will definetely post it.

www.fuel-saver.org is a good forum if you've never been
Old 05-10-2008, 08:33 PM
  #48  
Registered User
 
eric_the_red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by infiltrator
If what you are saying is right, and the government did shut this company down, I would be very very pissed at my country.

It is really funny to me that they made these things in the 70's!!!
Imagine if we started that kind of technology back then what would we have now! We would have full on hydrogen machines with little to no cost for fuel, and they would probably be freaking quick too!
Dude, you and me both.

We should be leading the world in renewable and alternative energy technology! This stuff ain't rocket surgery! Or is it....(j/k)

Everything costs something though, but I think I know what you mean.
Old 05-11-2008, 10:32 PM
  #49  
Registered User
 
Ghostduck's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Erick
Why settle for HHO assist when you can have full HHO?

I've been brainstorming a system. I have not read if HHO can be safely stored without rebonding into H2O, but if it can, why not run a propane mixer with a regulator and create hydrogen to be stored in an onboard tank that gets used like a propane tank and feeds the mixer for regular throttle control, completely eliminating the need for gasoline or extra wiring? it wouldn't need more than 35PSI. That way, the mixer controls the amount of gas you need instead of having to rely on the radio waves you are sending through the electrolyser based on your throttle to fracture the H2O into HHO.

I could set it up so that the electrolyser would kick on every time the storage tank drops below a certain PSI, and kicks off when it reaches that ideal storage psi. The tank wouldn't even have to hold that much HHO to be able to feed the propane mixer enough fuel to keep the vehicle performing like an average internal combustion engine is powering it. Besides, the more HHO you store, the bigger the catastrophic bang will be if the system backfires on you and explodes. Lol
First and foremost, I too am looking into this project as well. I was actually elated to discover that someone is attempting it on a 3VZE.

Next. HHO assist is possible, and is something that has been proven many times over that it is in fact possible. Running on HHO alone however is an IMPOSSIBILITY.

HHO and/or Brown's Gas are both trademarked names (although they are chemically the exact same thing.) The differences in the patents are the exact processes in which they created.

A study done by the Jet Propulsion Lab in California using Yull Brown's models, data and findings confirmed that the process of creating the gas is real, effective, and efficient, or should I say more efficient than in previous electrolysis models, and current Hydrogen production procedures. The differences of Hydrogen produced in a Production plant, and that of Electrolysis is as follows. Hydrogen in a Production plant is Di-atomic. Meaning that when hydrogen is extracted from whatever it has two atoms of hydrogen that create one molecule or H2. Hydrogen from Electrolysis is unique in that it is Mon-atomic, something that is not normally found or H1.

H2 is more efficient than a molecule of Gasoline, because for it to burn, the two Hydrogen atoms need less energy to separate them to combine with Oxygen. A Gasoline molecule has to separate Nitrogen, Carbon, Hydrogen in any number of configurations before it can do this. A Brown's gas Hydrogen molecule is more efficient than an H2 one because it is already separated, thus it has already usable energy.

Now here's where it gets interesting. The Propulsion lab found that Brown's gas is unique in that when the flame is produced, it is not creating an explosion, but rather a series of IMPLOSIONS! The implosions allow the gas to burn at a much safer temp than that of H2 or even other types of gasses.

While browns gas can be used to supplement gasoline, propane, or CNG in a combustion engine, It cannot be used as a sole metod of fuel to operate it. A combustion engine requires an explosion, something of which Brown's gas on its own does not produce.

Sorry for the Novel

Also one of the reasons why you typically don't see this stuff, is because of the controversy surrounding the proprietary rights of the patents. Yull Brown (Browns Gas) and Dennis Klein (HHO) both have claim to those names specificly as stated in their patents... however... they are chemically the same thing. It would be like having two of the exact same cars but withone being made in a plant in Detroit, and the other in Japan and then putting different brand names on each of them and selling them across the street from eachother. (Kinda like the Ford Ranger and the Mazda B3000 except you don't have cooperation or association between the two.)
Old 05-11-2008, 10:45 PM
  #50  
Registered User
 
Ghostduck's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Renofox..

Instead of moving the battery, I suggest that you look into one of the Bob Boyce designs for the electrolizer. While the designe and cost of the system will be more advanced, it also creates some safety features, as well as more compact methods of creating the system.
Old 05-12-2008, 10:42 AM
  #51  
tc
Contributing Member
 
tc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Longmont, CO
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Linky to something that actually says JPL on it that reports what you quote above (ie not from one of these websites that could just be saying that to try and con you into the deal).

As for proof, I have yet to see any actual DATA. I see a lot of CLAIMS, but no real DATA.
Old 05-12-2008, 12:35 PM
  #52  
Contributing Member
 
linuxrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Gladstone, Oregon
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yesterday i bought a liter of water, it cost me $1.50. If my mental math is right then that's about $5.60 a gallon.

Personally i am glad my car does not run on water.
Old 05-13-2008, 05:47 AM
  #53  
Registered User
 
Ghostduck's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tc
Linky to something that actually says JPL on it that reports what you quote above (ie not from one of these websites that could just be saying that to try and con you into the deal).

As for proof, I have yet to see any actual DATA. I see a lot of CLAIMS, but no real DATA.
Done.

http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/...sti_id=5206481

This link references the actual document that you are requesting.. Note that it was submitted in the 1970's. If you want the full document, you will have to order it, or check with your local University library to see if they have it archived.

D.J. Cerini (who's name appears on the paper) was an employee at the Jet Propulsion Lab at the California Institute of technology.
Old 06-05-2008, 09:08 AM
  #54  
Registered User
 
boudreaux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reno, have been researching to add an HHO generator to my '06 tacoma. how are you controlling the air/fuel mixture? I've seen both the wideband controllers and tuning module. Seems like the tuning module is the way to go if you want to be able to turn the system on/off.
Old 06-05-2008, 10:31 AM
  #55  
tc
Contributing Member
 
tc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Longmont, CO
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
On an '06? Isn't it still under warranty? Why give someone a reason to hassle you and deny a claim?
Old 06-05-2008, 11:19 AM
  #56  
Registered User
 
boudreaux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i wish it was....unfortunately when you drive 70 miles/day roundtrip the warranty doesn't last long...but hey, it's yota tuff. i get 25-26 mpg, and if i can get more all the better. the hho generator can be designed to be reversible, and harmless if properly setup.
Old 07-20-2008, 06:07 AM
  #57  
Registered User
 
Ravagin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: North Little Rock, Arkansas
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Love this topic of discussion!!! I have been "playing" with Solar and Hydrogen for a little over a year now and am to the point of installing a system into my 86 yota 4x4, it is a EFI 22r engine.

My question is where should I input the hydrogen?

I don't beleive my truck has a O2 sensor in the exhaust and the repair book says I can adjust the fuel/air mixture leaner if needed.

Reno, How goes your project to date?

Thanks for any help!!!
Old 07-20-2008, 07:41 AM
  #58  
Registered User
 
RiNkY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is there a reason why the gas in most of these devices appears to be generated and/or stored in Glass jars? Is it so that they DO break easily in the event of an accident and the gas vents away?

Surprised Billy Mays isn't selling these things on a TV Infomercial if any company actually wanted to commercially make them and put their neck on the line liability wise.
Old 07-21-2008, 03:36 PM
  #59  
Registered User
 
jamima's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Funny you say that I was a skeptic my self seeing people building them out of mason jars. I have maid nine different hho generators. All worked. But after twelve hundred dollars and six months of working on it. I made one that jumped my mpg from 17mpg to 21mpg. In my straight six 95 land cruiser automatic. And it also has 3" bigger tires then stock. And no I'm not getting my data from my odometer. I have a on board Garmin GPS that track the distance I travel. So scam or no scam it works for me!
Old 07-21-2008, 05:11 PM
  #60  
tc
Contributing Member
 
tc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Longmont, CO
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Post up the data, tank by tank please!


Quick Reply: Update on my HHO project



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:50 AM.