Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners
View Poll Results: whats the best late model stock offroader in the class?
Toyota 4runner
188
71.48%
Nissan Pathfinder
5
1.90%
Land Rover Discovery
66
25.10%
Chevy Blazer
1
0.38%
Ford Explorer
0
0%
Isuzu Trooper
1
0.38%
Dodge Durango
2
0.76%
Voters: 263. You may not vote on this poll

offroad poll

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-2003, 03:16 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
PhxTRDRunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought I should add...IF toyota made a off road track for a 4runner to excell on...I would bet my ^$%(&(^ that the discovery would have major issues on many sections. The offroad track at Land Rover was made too....MAKE THE LAND ROVER LOOK GOOD...not to show the many weaknesses it now has. I was just like many of you before I rented that discov., remember how legendary the Land Rover name is off road...times have changed and while the Range Rover might still have some off road prowess...the discovery is weak at best. IMHO.
Old 03-01-2003, 05:29 PM
  #22  
Contributing Member
 
BT17R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Da Gorge, Oregon
Posts: 5,918
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by 4x4CPOSEADOG
I voted for 4Runner, but the most capable off road vehicle in my list is the 1994 thru 1997 Land Cruisers with the optional Front and Rear Locking differentials coupled with center locking differential and you can conquer any terrain. IMHO the LC is the most capable go anywhere all terrain vehicle. Not to mention if you installed that the Kazuma supercharger to increase HP to a whopping 300+ HP and a massive torque.

Noel
Yep, no question. Still kinda wish I'd kept mine, but I've said that about, oh, a half-dozen vehicles I've owned that've become desirable classics.
Old 03-01-2003, 06:23 PM
  #23  
Contributing Member
 
tomus1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Wallingford, Ct
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My first thought was to vote for the Discovery, but then I thought about the question and applied every possible off road situation and came up with the 4Runner on top.

The Discovery was designed to be a true off road machine. It originally gave up some of the creature comforts of most modern SUV's in place of great off road design. Truth is, I could take a Runner anywhere that a Discovery could go. Any terrain that is going to stop a 4Runner, is probably going to halt a Rover's forward movement as well.

Where the 4Runner won out for me was reliability. The Land Rovers have terrible repair histories. They have about the worst designed motor of all time. If I were in a situation, far from civilization, and I had to trust my truck to get me home...I'm taking the one that is going to start every time...


The 4Runner!
Old 03-01-2003, 07:02 PM
  #24  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
knemo77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i was sure the 4runner would win with this crowd but im glad to see people giving props to the discovery. And I agree with all the comments about the shortcomings of the disco. Thanks for all the responses im glad i went with my yota then.
Old 03-01-2003, 07:21 PM
  #25  
Contributing Member
 
tomus1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Wallingford, Ct
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wait, Wait, Wait a minute!

There is another "Noel" in the forum? I was looking at the quote about the Land Cruiser and thinking "I didn't type that". But I do agree with all that "New Noel" has to say. Must be the name that makes him so smart.


Oh, one more thing that I can't believe no one else brought up.

Landrover is owned by FORD!
Old 03-01-2003, 07:24 PM
  #26  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
knemo77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that would explain the reliability.....i didnt think about that.
Old 03-01-2003, 07:32 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
Cebby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by tomus1000
Oh, one more thing that I can't believe no one else brought up.

Landrover is owned by FORD!
Ford also owns Jaguar and Aston Martin, FWIW. I don't think they will muck up any of these marques. (If they're smart)
Old 03-02-2003, 09:14 AM
  #28  
Registered User
 
rowan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: maine
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
troopers arn't bad offroad.

my grandfather has one. it's pretty rugged.

4runners are better though.
Old 03-02-2003, 11:18 AM
  #29  
Registered User
 
PhxTRDRunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd hate to be the guy that picked the durango!
Old 03-02-2003, 05:03 PM
  #30  
Contributing Member
 
RTdawgs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,068
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you gotta be kidding me . this is a toyota forum, of course 4Runner is gonna be number one. also, it is a great stock wheeler, but so is the Discovery. but none of the others come close to 4Runner. explorers, blazers, and durangos are garbage...no flex or locker or ground clearance.
Old 03-02-2003, 06:28 PM
  #31  
Registered User
 
ChitRod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Alabama
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what about the Jeep Wrangler Rubicon, or Jeep Grand Cherokee, if I didn't have a Yota that would be my choice I think.
Old 03-03-2003, 04:05 AM
  #32  
Registered User
 
Sporin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Windsor, VT U.S.A.
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I chose the Disco since the question was about stock, off road ability. Solid axles, CDL (until recently), amazing ETC and HDC, overbuild chassis and suspension.... good stuff. The Discovery certainly has it's shortcomings, especially on road and in the build quality area, but they really are stellar off the beaten track.

2 years ago, my wife got me a gift certificate to the Land Rover off Road Driving School in Manchester, VT. Five hours with those guys and you become a believer.

Still, when I bought my own 4WD, I bought a 4Runner, albeit a straight axled one. I just can't handle the mechanical needs, the high costs, or the crazy parts prices of a Land Rover right now.
Old 03-03-2003, 04:39 AM
  #33  
Contributing Member
 
keisur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
4RUNNER!!!

Even though the 2003's are ugly as sin, I will remain true to my breed! I love 4Runners and Land Cruisers, I will probably never own another kind of 4x4.
Old 03-03-2003, 08:29 AM
  #34  
Contributing Member
 
rimpainter.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Disco is definetly capable off-road. But which vehicle has the best overall mechanical reliability?

Getting stuck in mud or on whoopty do's is one thing, but getting stuck mechanically is another story.

I'll take the Toyota for not leaving me in the middle of nowhere. (head gasket recall complete, of course )
Old 03-04-2003, 04:29 AM
  #35  
Contributing Member
 
keisur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I didn't see anything above but did anybody point out that explorers have independent rear suspension now? at least, I think all of them do, I was behind one last night laughing since now they need a 4 wheel alignment $$$. what a piece. I guess that's why nobody chose it,
Old 03-04-2003, 07:23 AM
  #36  
Guest
 
jruz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: North Bend, WA
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, it's sad that everything is going FIS (fully-independent susp.).

My father-in-law has a '93 Exploder ( ) and that thing is actually impressive. There are a few years of the Exploder that do make capable off-roaders. The have the same feel as a Jeep Cherokee.

Last year he got a 2002 Exploder...that thing is a grocery-getter if I ever saw one.
It's nice 'n' fancy, but not my taste.

He went from 2 solid axles to FIS...he has yet to take it on rough roads like he did with the last one.

Jim
Old 03-04-2003, 08:17 AM
  #37  
Contributing Member
 
keisur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my mom has one of those Buick Rendezvous and I think it is more offroady than the explorer. haha just kidding but I think it would be a close fight. haha.
Old 03-04-2003, 12:46 PM
  #38  
Registered User
 
PhxTRDRunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
don't the early year exploders have twin i-beam up front, not a solid axle....and come with biga$$ 225/60/15s or some variation???? Doesn't sound very off road worthy to me. :confused:
Old 03-04-2003, 01:38 PM
  #39  
Contributing Member
 
turboale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 4,868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about the new VW Touareg? Locking diffs, adjustible ride height, and maybe at V-10 T-Desiel??
Old 03-04-2003, 07:16 PM
  #40  
Guest
 
jruz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: North Bend, WA
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by PhxTRDRunner
don't the early year exploders have twin i-beam up front, not a solid axle....and come with biga$$ 225/60/15s or some variation???? Doesn't sound very off road worthy to me. :confused:
I dunno what year that would be. But my father-in-law's was a solid axle for sure.

Jim


Quick Reply: offroad poll



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:43 AM.