For all you K&N haters...
#22
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Tuscaloosa, AL
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah, as the mazda and baldwin filters are fibrous filters also. but i've been driving almost 10,000 miles on my K&N and my MAF is not gummed up with oil...most likely because it came pre-oiled from the factory. most people run so many miles, then wash it out, and when it comes time to oil it yourself, they just over-do-it...that oil in K&N's recharge kit goes a long way...
#23
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Tuscaloosa, AL
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah, but just think...for example...$10 x 7 = $70!!! at this point in time, you would've bought 7 NAPA filters, when you could've just bought one K&N and their recharge kit!!!
#24
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I change mine out every 15-20k miles. That means 7 times of changing it would mean 105-140k miles! I can live with spending $70 for less hassle (washing, oiling, etc.), maintenance issues (MAF) and better filteration.
#25
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Tuscaloosa, AL
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
true there, as in my opinion every man to his own. but yeah, where i live, it's dusty and add in going off-roading and all kinds of hunting trips throughout the year, i chose K&N because mine needs to be washed about every 5k - 8k miles, depending on what part of the year it is...
Last edited by mikes19984x4; 11-08-2007 at 10:26 AM.
#26
Registered User
#27
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just my two cents... I was talking to my mechanic the other day (getting my brakes done) and he started going off on air filters and in his opinion Fram and K&N are the worst at filtration and the ones that he sees the most problems with. He said that he would personally stick with OEM air filters... I have a True Flow in mine, and he had no problem with foam filters. One point he brought up that I thought was pretty valid: he mentioned that there is no way that each time you clean a gauze air filter that it will be restored to how it was when you bought it. So over time your air flow and filtration will go down.
The following link is a movie done by True Flow (so yes, it's biased) but I think they bring up some pretty good info.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ThmW2SW1I-k
The following link is a movie done by True Flow (so yes, it's biased) but I think they bring up some pretty good info.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ThmW2SW1I-k
#28
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: phoenix az
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
while i was attending uti a true flow vender came in and made a good demenstration. he took a paper filter,k&n filter and the true flow. than he put them in a flow bench device with a coffe filter thing behind the filters witch would capture any dirt passed through the fiter. than dumped dirt on them and the true flow filter flowed the best and filtered the most dirt out of the air.
#29
I have been running K&N's since 1991 on about 15 different cars and trucks and I have never had a mass air issue, if you watch your oiling you will never have a problem, less pressure drop = best performance period. But without the new amsoil filters pressure drop we have no real comparison. I was watching an episode of CHIPS one time and they were at a desert race and one of the trucks had a K&N logo so that was late 70's early 80's. MM&FF and 5.0 magazine have been testing this stuff for 15 years on arguealbly the most dyno tested engine of all time the 5.0 and have proved without a doubt power gains in the 5-7 range over a paper filter. It all comes down to pressure drop, and a clean paper filter still is worse and once it gets dirty forget it. I doubt the 1% less the K&N filters is anything like the dirt that bypasses the filter due to the crappy design of the housings letting dirt bypass the filter, at least K&N and others use rubber to help seal the area while a paper filter uses hard plastic. I have seen dirt trails pass in almost every airbox I have seen. Look at the filter in you houses central air system to see how much dirt passes around the filter, the dirtier it gets the more it bypasses the filter, that is why I tape my air filters in.
Last edited by tntempest; 11-08-2007 at 02:47 PM.
#31
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Tuscaloosa, AL
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
excellent point tntempest. all of the "horror" stories you hear about ruining the MAF is simpley from error on the owner of the vehicle, as they over-oiled it, because the factory does not over-oil the filters...
#32
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Tuscaloosa, AL
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#33
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have been running K&N's since 1991 on about 15 different cars and trucks and I have never had a mass air issue, if you watch your oiling you will never have a problem, less pressure drop = best performance period. But without the new amsoil filters pressure drop we have no real comparison. I was watching an episode of CHIPS one time and they were at a desert race and one of the trucks had a K&N logo so that was late 70's early 80's. MM&FF and 5.0 magazine have been testing this stuff for 15 years on arguealbly the most dyno tested engine of all time the 5.0 and have proved without a doubt power gains in the 5-7 range over a paper filter. It all comes down to pressure drop, and a clean paper filter still is worse and once it gets dirty forget it. I doubt the 1% less the K&N filters is anything like the dirt that bypasses the filter due to the crappy design of the housings letting dirt bypass the filter, at least K&N and others use rubber to help seal the area while a paper filter uses hard plastic. I have seen dirt trails pass in almost every airbox I have seen. Look at the filter in you houses central air system to see how much dirt passes around the filter, the dirtier it gets the more it bypasses the filter, that is why I tape my air filters in.
K&Ns were developed for desert racing vehicles. The need was for a filter that would not clog and still filter at a reasonable level. Keep in mind that many desert racing vehicles get an engine rebuild after each race so filters that pass small amounts of dirt are not of concern. All they care about is not clogging and providing good HP (flow). That is not really the same criteria most of us have for our daily drivers.
#35
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Tuscaloosa, AL
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah, i agree on the point about the desert racing vehicles, but i personally have noticed no excess build-ups or deposits on the engine side of my K&N filter, as i checked it all out when i did my ISR mod. but, once again, every man to his own...
and i still don't get the people who are all saying "i've had this" or "i've had that" and say they're going back to stock, because in the test on the link at the start of this thread, the "stock" filters seemed to do the same if not worse...
and i still don't get the people who are all saying "i've had this" or "i've had that" and say they're going back to stock, because in the test on the link at the start of this thread, the "stock" filters seemed to do the same if not worse...
Last edited by mikes19984x4; 11-08-2007 at 05:13 PM.
#36
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ft.Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
nice post. ive been contemplating getting a true flow filter for a bit.
theres a link to their video on this page http://www.burtmanindustries.com/zoo..._truflo_96u_v6
theres a link to their video on this page http://www.burtmanindustries.com/zoo..._truflo_96u_v6
#37
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Tuscaloosa, AL
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
nice post. ive been contemplating getting a true flow filter for a bit.
theres a link to their video on this page http://www.burtmanindustries.com/zoo..._truflo_96u_v6
theres a link to their video on this page http://www.burtmanindustries.com/zoo..._truflo_96u_v6
thanks man. yeah, i thought about something other than K&N when i first got my 4runner, but i decided on the K&N as that's what my dad, grandad, and uncle have all been running for years in their gas and diesel trucks and haven't had any problems with 'em...
#38
Registered User
nice post. ive been contemplating getting a true flow filter for a bit.
theres a link to their video on this page http://www.burtmanindustries.com/zoo..._truflo_96u_v6
theres a link to their video on this page http://www.burtmanindustries.com/zoo..._truflo_96u_v6
#39
Contributing Member
#40
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
However, regarding the test, I do think a better test needs to be done. Not only with more mileage (I think 500 miles is hardly enough), but in a better controlled environment. BUT, I can guarantee that paper will still win by a land slide.
Last edited by cackalak han; 11-09-2007 at 05:32 AM.