3.4L vs 2.7L

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

02-06-2008, 11:10 PM

deSCHUTTER

Registered User

Thread Starter

Join Date: Feb 2007

Posts: 20

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

3.4L vs 2.7L

Hey, I'm from up in Canada and unfortunately don't have the 2.7L up here.
I'm coming down to the states to get a 96-00 Tacoma since I just destroyed my 91

.
Just wondering whats the better options of the two. Pros/Cons
Thanks

Reply Like

02-07-2008, 02:01 AM

icerunner

Contributing Member

Join Date: Apr 2007

Location: Chicago (area) IL

Posts: 313

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Good luck with your search...if you can go with the 3.4L In my opinion and from my experiance with 150K trouble free miles, the extra HP and torque you get from the V6 is worth it .....the 4 cam engine we have is "overengineered" that why super chargers are so popular as our engines can take it...if you can, "3.4" all the way....
BTW: Spend the 100.00 US to have the vehicle inspected by a dealer tech BEFORE YOU buy . even if you know your "Stuff" haveing someone else look at the car will take the emotion out of the purchase and may help find some expensive issues.
I did and the guy was great... he checked everything....simply ask the owner if he minds if you have the car inspected at the dealer and have him meet you there with the car....Money well spent good luck...hey check out "auto trader"

Last edited by icerunner; 02-07-2008 at 02:05 AM. Reason: typos