YotaTech Forums

Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

3.0l Improvement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-02-2008, 04:31 PM
  #61  
Registered User
 
Alex 400's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Shoreline, Wa
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by space-junk
yea... like another 100 hp oomph!!!
yeah seriously. hell, isn't that kinda why they started doing sbc swaps, was for like double or triple the power?
Alex 400 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-02-2008, 04:35 PM
  #62  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
space-junk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Wilton, CA
Posts: 5,527
Received 118 Likes on 67 Posts
thats why they werent dune racing toyotas professionally until the late 90s when they started to make decent power...
space-junk is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-02-2008, 04:47 PM
  #63  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
J_Dawg72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here is what I have for pics
I have some pics of the dyno readings. The graph is hard to read being the gap in between number. Go to this link to look at pics. The number I gave you are real the print outs I have to wait for but look at the pics.

http://www.myspace.com/jandjcustomperformance
J_Dawg72 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-02-2008, 04:59 PM
  #64  
Contributing Member
 
Jay351's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: maple ridge, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 9,055
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts


Uhm.. Thats a whole lot of torque from a 3vze....
Jay351 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-02-2008, 05:00 PM
  #65  
Registered User
 
Whitey13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those TQ #'s can't be right.

EDIT: Damn You JAy!
Whitey13 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-02-2008, 05:16 PM
  #66  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
J_Dawg72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They are you are seeing them.
J_Dawg72 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-02-2008, 05:22 PM
  #67  
Registered User
 
jason191918's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hopkins, MN
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What "stock" 3.0 puts out 80 less hp and 65 more ft lbs of torque than any other stock 3.0?
jason191918 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-02-2008, 05:55 PM
  #68  
Registered User
 
Whitey13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Never would've guessed a 3.0 has more TQ than a 3.4. I learn something new here everyday.
Whitey13 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-02-2008, 06:17 PM
  #69  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
space-junk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Wilton, CA
Posts: 5,527
Received 118 Likes on 67 Posts
Originally Posted by Jay351


Uhm.. Thats a whole lot of torque from a 3vze....
no kidding... how the hell do you have almost 100 more lbft. torq than i do with 50K more miles???



Edit:


also, i dont understand whats so different about this intake than any other ISR Mod...
Last edited by space-junk; 10-02-2008 at 06:22 PM.
space-junk is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-02-2008, 06:18 PM
  #70  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
J_Dawg72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Stock 3.0 Comes With 135hp At The Engine And Roughly 101 At The Rear Wheels. So I Dont Know Were You You Are Getting They Come With 80 Less That Would Put The 3.0 Coming With 180 Hp And We All Know That Is Not True. Are You Thinking The 3.4l.
J_Dawg72 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-02-2008, 06:25 PM
  #71  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
space-junk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Wilton, CA
Posts: 5,527
Received 118 Likes on 67 Posts
Originally Posted by J_Dawg72
A Stock 3.0 Comes With 135hp At The Engine And Roughly 101 At The Rear Wheels. So I Dont Know Were You You Are Getting They Come With 80 Less That Would Put The 3.0 Coming With 180 Hp And We All Know That Is Not True. Are You Thinking The 3.4l.
Semantics... that doesnt matter... what matters is how you got those torque numbers... thats stock 350 SBC torque numbers...
space-junk is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-02-2008, 06:26 PM
  #72  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
J_Dawg72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have also seen some numbers that say 150 hp and 180TQ
J_Dawg72 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-02-2008, 06:27 PM
  #73  
Registered User
 
Whitey13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All I want to know is what human being capitalizes the first letter in every word they type.
Whitey13 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-02-2008, 07:29 PM
  #74  
Registered User
 
RaginYota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Whitey13
All I want to know is what human being capitalizes the first letter in every word they type.
RaginYota is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-02-2008, 08:25 PM
  #75  
Registered User
 
Alex 400's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Shoreline, Wa
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by J_Dawg72
I have also seen some numbers that say 150 hp and 180TQ
those are the #'s . those are the #'s from toyota as they rated to motor.

consumer reports says 150 horsepower @4800 and 180 torque @3400 .

http://consumerguideauto.howstuffwor...-4runner-4.htm
Last edited by Alex 400; 10-02-2008 at 08:28 PM.
Alex 400 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-02-2008, 08:53 PM
  #76  
Contributing Member
 
Jay351's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: maple ridge, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 9,055
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Yep factory output is 150hp and 180ft-lbs of torque at the crank.

I dunno how you got over 200 ft-lbs of torque with a stock truck...
Jay351 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-02-2008, 09:03 PM
  #77  
Registered User
 
Alex 400's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Shoreline, Wa
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jay351
Yep factory output is 150hp and 180ft-lbs of torque at the crank.

I dunno how you got over 200 ft-lbs of torque with a stock truck...
especially at 2200 or so rpm that is way too low. and 100 horsepower at 2800. peak power on a stock 3.0 is at 4800.
Alex 400 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-02-2008, 09:23 PM
  #78  
Registered User
 
Alex 400's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Shoreline, Wa
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
double post
Last edited by Alex 400; 10-02-2008 at 09:25 PM.
Alex 400 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-02-2008, 10:12 PM
  #79  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
space-junk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Wilton, CA
Posts: 5,527
Received 118 Likes on 67 Posts
okay, so ill be the ass and say it... 150$ was a bit much when you could have gone to an exhaust shop and had them bend and weld bungs into a pipe, then go to autozone and buy the adapter... maybe 50 bucks net cost, and maybe cheaper...
space-junk is offline  
Reply Like
Old 10-03-2008, 06:10 AM
  #80  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
J_Dawg72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I spoke to the dyno owner this morning and he said on the YQ number I must take 25% off of them to make them legit TQ numbers. He figured I just assumed that yesterday.
J_Dawg72 is offline  
Reply Like



Advanced Search
Quick Reply: 3.0l Improvement


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:30 PM.