Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

This seems kind of half a$$ to me...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-28-2004, 12:07 AM
  #1  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
superjoe83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oregon City, Oregon
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
This seems kind of half a$$ to me...

check these guys out clicky
Old 04-28-2004, 03:53 AM
  #2  
Contributing Member
 
MTL_4runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montreal, QC Canada
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by superjoe83
check these guys out clicky

Those guys must not have any engineers on the team doing the designing...
Why the heck would you put an air cleaner underneath your car!
There is also a reason why turbos are put so close to the head on the engine!
Those must be the laggiest forced induction going. :pat:
Old 04-28-2004, 05:44 AM
  #3  
Contributing Member
 
DavidA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree...the first stream you ford would Hydrolock your engine!!! What were they thinking??

Now if they could route the intake to a snorkel then I might think differently...but I see the potential for disaster under that truck. Rocks...dirt, etc.
Old 04-28-2004, 05:59 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
tombothetominator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Prescott Arizona
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Doesn't water get into your engine with the filter mounted down low?
No, even under very wet conditions the filter sheds most all water. Under wet conditions the throttle position is usually very light because of traction issues so the engine is taking in very little air anyway. However, we do rigorous testing with our truck systems because many off-road wet conditions may require full throttle. Even under extremely wet conditions, where the water is flying clear over the top of the vehicle plowing through deep puddles, we have never had a water related drivability problem with any of our kits. However, if you were to completely submerge the filter, you would draw water through the filter and into the intake tubing."
Where the water is flying clear over the top of the vehicle? Yeah, i can do that in a 3 inch deep puddle! But hey, at least it wont hydrolock me in heavy rain. That is reassuring. *BOGUS!*
Old 04-28-2004, 06:37 AM
  #5  
Contributing Member
 
mt_goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oklahoma State
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by tombothetominator
"Doesn't water get into your engine with the filter mounted down low?
No, even under very wet conditions the filter sheds most all water. Under wet conditions the throttle position is usually very light because of traction issues so the engine is taking in very little air anyway. However, we do rigorous testing with our truck systems because many off-road wet conditions may require full throttle. Even under extremely wet conditions, where the water is flying clear over the top of the vehicle plowing through deep puddles, we have never had a water related drivability problem with any of our kits. However, if you were to completely submerge the filter, you would draw water through the filter and into the intake tubing."
Where the water is flying clear over the top of the vehicle? Yeah, i can do that in a 3 inch deep puddle! But hey, at least it wont hydrolock me in heavy rain. That is reassuring. *BOGUS!*
Do you guys make a turbo for the 3.0L V6?
Old 04-28-2004, 12:05 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
tombothetominator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Prescott Arizona
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mt_goat
Do you guys make a turbo for the 3.0L V6?
Ummm..... Couldnt tell ya. Dont work for them, just pulled a quote off the site??
Old 04-28-2004, 01:16 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Nolan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it looks as if they connect the the turbo the to exhaust tubes after that cat and that is what spins the turbo. I dont know much about turbo's but that doesnt seem too efficient. All that nice shinny pipping is just for the intake.



Old 04-28-2004, 01:37 PM
  #8  
Contributing Member
 
mt_goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oklahoma State
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
[QUOTE=Nolan]it looks as if they connect the the turbo the to exhaust tubes after that cat and that is what spins the turbo. I dont know much about turbo's but that doesnt seem too efficient. All that nice shinny pipping is just for the intake.

QUOTE]

Maybe just a little more piping for a snorkel wouldn't hurt too much.
Old 04-28-2004, 05:38 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
2001Millrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I dont know much about turbo stuff, but the whole thing looks like a pure-stupidity.
Old 04-29-2004, 11:25 PM
  #10  
Contributing Member
 
Mossback74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


What's this I see? The intake right next to the exhaust pipe. now THATS engineering!
Old 04-30-2004, 04:54 AM
  #11  
Contributing Member
 
DavidA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's so it can boil away any water that may be heading towards the intake while you are fording a stream!!!
Old 04-30-2004, 06:10 AM
  #12  
Contributing Member
 
rimpainter.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
After lifting my Tacoma my truck wouldn't get out of it's own way. Driving on the freeway and pulling hills was flat out embarrassing. My foot was to the floor everywhere I went.
Lifting your truck causes this? Hmmm, interesting.

Did anyone see anything about a VB upgrade?
Old 04-30-2004, 06:16 AM
  #13  
Contributing Member
 
SLC Punk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 5,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't even know what to say!


Gotta be the worst idea ever.

What next, a supercharger that drives itself off of the rear wheels?
Old 04-30-2004, 06:25 AM
  #14  
Contributing Member
 
mt_goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oklahoma State
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Come on guys they just have a few kinks to work out and it may work. Just don't put too much oil on that K&N filter or you'll have a nice flame job down the sides.
Old 04-30-2004, 06:32 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
justinh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: woodstock, ga
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
holy cow, it used to be that it was mounted towards the front but in that one picture they have the thing mounted all the way at the back of the vehicle!!!! Under the gas tank!!!! That think literally would be useless back there, with the amount of pipe they used/bent for that one they could have built a new manifold like your are supposed to and put the turbo where it belongs!
Old 04-30-2004, 06:43 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have played with turbos on my car(90 plymouth laser-2L approx 350hp) and the idea of the remote turbocharger is a nice one, but as one person said it is innefficient. Gases in the exhaust cool quickly and as they cool they shrink. So basically your going to have turbo-lag somethin fierce.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1uzRunner
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
63
11-10-2018 03:58 PM
Williamemslie
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
14
10-05-2015 09:28 AM
Daenerysdad
Offroad Tech
2
10-01-2015 07:33 PM
86 87 4Runners
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners
10
09-05-2015 06:02 AM
86 87 4Runners
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
3
09-02-2015 03:54 AM



Quick Reply: This seems kind of half a$$ to me...



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:01 PM.