Valve Cover Washer Seals
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Valve Cover Washer Seals
Hi everyone,
I ordered four washer seals from ToyotaPartsDeal.com
Part Number: 90210-08040
They don’t look like the ones that are currently installed but the website said they’re for my truck. They do “fit” and the nuts will thread on but it doesn’t look like it’s supposed to. Can anyone shed some light on this?
Thanks
I ordered four washer seals from ToyotaPartsDeal.com
Part Number: 90210-08040
They don’t look like the ones that are currently installed but the website said they’re for my truck. They do “fit” and the nuts will thread on but it doesn’t look like it’s supposed to. Can anyone shed some light on this?
Thanks
#2
Registered User
What year is your Truck?
Is the only new washer seal the one on the right?
If so, it looks fine, just as long as the nut is snug, but not that tight. The washer seal on the left looks like it is beyond compressed and is past it's prime. The new washer seals should sit taller as they have not been compressed and have not gone through the many heat cycles your old ones have.
The part number you gave says it does not fit my 1987 22R.
It looks like there was a change for the 1994 model year for these washer seals according to parts.toyota.com
For my 22R, part number 90210-08026 is listed which is listed for 1983-1994 22R series engines:
https://parts.toyota.com/p/Toyota_19...021008026.html
The part number you gave shows that those washer seals fit 1994-1995 22R series engines:
https://parts.toyota.com/p/WASHER---...021008040.html
I do not know what change was made or why, but I do not think you have anything to worry about, just as long as the washer seals fit nicely between the stud and the rocker arm cover (valve cover).
What do the bottom side of the washer seal look like?
Is the only new washer seal the one on the right?
If so, it looks fine, just as long as the nut is snug, but not that tight. The washer seal on the left looks like it is beyond compressed and is past it's prime. The new washer seals should sit taller as they have not been compressed and have not gone through the many heat cycles your old ones have.
The part number you gave says it does not fit my 1987 22R.
It looks like there was a change for the 1994 model year for these washer seals according to parts.toyota.com
For my 22R, part number 90210-08026 is listed which is listed for 1983-1994 22R series engines:
https://parts.toyota.com/p/Toyota_19...021008026.html
The part number you gave shows that those washer seals fit 1994-1995 22R series engines:
https://parts.toyota.com/p/WASHER---...021008040.html
I do not know what change was made or why, but I do not think you have anything to worry about, just as long as the washer seals fit nicely between the stud and the rocker arm cover (valve cover).
What do the bottom side of the washer seal look like?
The following users liked this post:
ev13wt (12-12-2018)
#3
Registered User
Thread Starter
I have a ‘94. So I’m right in the middle, haha. I also saw those other ones you mentioned but they were more expensive.
Yes, the one on the right is new and left is old. Actually not that old, only a few years. It’s aftermarket from a cheap kit and I replaced them when I did the timing chain. I wanted OEM this time.
They do look like they’ll seal just fine but they have this grooved shape which makes me think they sit inside something.
Yes, the one on the right is new and left is old. Actually not that old, only a few years. It’s aftermarket from a cheap kit and I replaced them when I did the timing chain. I wanted OEM this time.
They do look like they’ll seal just fine but they have this grooved shape which makes me think they sit inside something.
#6
Registered User
Thread Starter
Ah, ok. I guess I was questioning them because of the drastic shape/size difference from the existing seals...which as said they are super crushed. Probably not a good reference then.
Thanks guys!
Thanks guys!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
211
Newbie Tech Section
9
04-21-2020 05:58 PM
njkev7
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
3
02-11-2009 03:57 PM