Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

Should I go 93-95, or 96-98 4 Runner, dumb it down for me.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-09-2009, 10:25 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
watchesnboats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Should I go 93-95, or 96-98 4 Runner, dumb it down for me.

Hey guys. First, I am so impressed by all the knowledge many of you have in here. Here is my dilemna/question. I am going to buy a 4Runner as soon as I sell my Celica and am trying to decide which year/engine I should buy. I had a 95 some years ago and absolutely loved it, and still prefer that body style. However, I am not really a gear head, can do very basic things on my car, but don't really know much about diving into anything with the engine. I have another car that is my daily driver and I am looking to swap from a small car to 4Runner for my extra car.

My uses for the truck will be hauling around fishing rods, reels, and coolers on trips to the marina and back. Occasional trips to a hunting farm which might feature light 4X4 activities on days when the fields are a bit soft. And perhaps down the road, towing a 20ft or so center console fishing boat short distances. Obviously, reliability is a huge concern as I want something I can keep the oil fresh in, keep the filters clean, and not worry about.

Whatever I buy will likely have to have some mileage on it because my budget is 3-6k to get started.

Love to hear your thoughts on which direction I should go with my purchase/trade. If you have any other questions about my usage or that might shape your opinion on which vehicle is good for me, then just ask.

Thanks for all the help.
Old 01-09-2009, 11:06 AM
  #2  
Contributing Member
 
Elton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Siletz,Oregon
Posts: 12,261
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
id go with the 96-98 the 2.7L or 3.4L are great engines
Old 01-09-2009, 11:15 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Tubbyfatty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 1,903
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Yea I agree with Elton, if you have the extra money, go with the 96-98, the 3.4s are amazing.

But i do hate the 3rd gens because all i see are snobby women driving them with automatics and big rims. Get a manual (they make manuals for 3rd gens right?).

Just my $0.02
Old 01-09-2009, 11:17 AM
  #4  
Contributing Member
 
Elton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Siletz,Oregon
Posts: 12,261
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
yes they do and if your lucky enough you can get a e locker
Old 01-09-2009, 11:22 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
mrmatson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
+1 for a 3rd gen with a 3.4, especially if towing a boat
Old 01-09-2009, 11:23 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
a4runnerfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Grew up in S.C.V, So Cal.....now in Hampstead, NC
Posts: 4,592
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3rd gen, 3.4 v6, E-locker
Old 01-09-2009, 01:03 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
thook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NW Ark on wooded ten acres...Ozarks at large!
Posts: 8,656
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
3rd gen w/3.4. Hell, with or without elocker! But, even better if you find one with. I have a 2nd with the 3.0 and that's fine, it'll work. But it does not compare at all to the 3.4.

Oh, and get the 5spd, if you can.
Old 01-09-2009, 01:10 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
toy power's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I feel the same way about the body style... I much prefer the 2nd gen also. The only problem with them is the engine choice. 22re is hard to find in those, and underpowered. 3.0 is still underpowered, and breaks. The solution is a 3.4 powered 2nd gen haha.. Really if any kind of towing is in the equation, and reliability is key, I have to say 96 and up. Good luck with buying
Old 01-09-2009, 01:15 PM
  #9  
Contributing Member
 
Jay351's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: maple ridge, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 9,055
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Get the 1996-1998. The 3.4 (or 2.7) is a much better v6 then the 3.0 in the 88-95 trucks.

Should be less to work on. But I like the lines of the 2nd gen bodies much more. The 3rd gens just look a little too....suvish for me..
Old 01-09-2009, 01:57 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
scuba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 11,338
Received 120 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by a4runnerfreak
3rd gen, 3.4 v6, 5 SPEED, E-locker
Fixed it for ya




Old 01-09-2009, 02:12 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
a4runnerfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Grew up in S.C.V, So Cal.....now in Hampstead, NC
Posts: 4,592
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Scooooby
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MTLroadierunner
Newbie Tech Section
3
07-15-2015 12:58 PM
Cplmike
Newbie Tech Section
5
07-08-2015 08:47 PM
skoti89
Off Road Trip Planning, Expeditions, Trips, & Events
0
07-06-2015 07:45 PM
wilbertd
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
2
07-06-2015 07:39 AM
HRDC0R19
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
3
07-05-2015 06:43 PM



Quick Reply: Should I go 93-95, or 96-98 4 Runner, dumb it down for me.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:27 AM.