Any drawbacks to 33x9.5R15s?
#61
Registered User
All this talk about siping has brought up another question. I've read that all those little edges help on both slick conditions (ice/snow), hard braking conditions and on low dry-low traction surfaces (gravel and rocks). Do any of you have siped tires that you run all year? I'm thinking that it might be a good idea to get mine siped if I can still run them all year long and not have them fly apart or start chunking off.
#62
Registered User
#63
Registered User
Well mine are siped and run all year. The siping keeps the tire cooler so it should last longer. Discount charged $12/tire I think to do it.
One thing which might make this thread a bit easier to follow is if we qualify our opinions with the driving surface. For example, the statement that narrow is always better on snow is not true, see Iceland.
Stating the narrow tires to better on snowy roads or shallow snow on a harder surface generally is true.
That said a wide tire with good siping on a 4wd truck like ours works great on snowy roads. Ice and debris get into the siping and increase the abrasiveness.
As for mud tread Vs. AT when snow wheeling, I have wheeled with friends where we traded who was going to get up what snow obstacle based on the snow consistency. One minute my AT's were getting better traction, the next the aggressive mudders were, all depending on how hard packed it was. None of us had enough tire to float on soft powder snow and the snow on the trail was not deep or powdery enough anyway.
Maybe a siped mudder is the best compromise, don't really know.
Frank
One thing which might make this thread a bit easier to follow is if we qualify our opinions with the driving surface. For example, the statement that narrow is always better on snow is not true, see Iceland.
Stating the narrow tires to better on snowy roads or shallow snow on a harder surface generally is true.
That said a wide tire with good siping on a 4wd truck like ours works great on snowy roads. Ice and debris get into the siping and increase the abrasiveness.
As for mud tread Vs. AT when snow wheeling, I have wheeled with friends where we traded who was going to get up what snow obstacle based on the snow consistency. One minute my AT's were getting better traction, the next the aggressive mudders were, all depending on how hard packed it was. None of us had enough tire to float on soft powder snow and the snow on the trail was not deep or powdery enough anyway.
Maybe a siped mudder is the best compromise, don't really know.
Frank
#64
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Shoreline, Wa
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All this talk about siping has brought up another question. I've read that all those little edges help on both slick conditions (ice/snow), hard braking conditions and on low dry-low traction surfaces (gravel and rocks). Do any of you have siped tires that you run all year? I'm thinking that it might be a good idea to get mine siped if I can still run them all year long and not have them fly apart or start chunking off.
Ok another thing that you need to take into consideration matt, is how deep the snow is that YOU are driving in. If the snow is a foot deep, yeah 33x10.50 or the 9.50 would be great because you can sink to the base underneath and go forward. If you are driving in snow that is quite a bit deeper than that, would you rather sink into it or float on top of it? On ice, in my opinion, a smaller tire like a 235/75-15 would do better than 31's because the contact area is much smaller than the 31x10.50 giving more PSI on the ground. The taller tires don't give you any more PSI, they actually take PSI away because the footprint is longer, thus reducing ground pressure.
Look at the tires that the military used to cross the tundra, huge tall tires that would reduce ground pressure because of their massive contact patch. Scroll down to see the original use of the tires not the Bigfoot 5 version.
http://www.bigfoot4x4.com/more5.html
Last edited by Alex 400; 12-15-2008 at 11:29 AM.
#65
Registered User
Thread Starter
I'm looking for traction in less than 2 feet of snow (at the max)- winter forest service roads to get to my fishing spots. The aired down contact pact between a 31x10.5 and a 33x9.5 should be pretty similar. Most of the increase in contact patch size comes from the increase in length of the patch, not width.
#66
Registered User
#67
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Shoreline, Wa
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm looking for traction in less than 2 feet of snow (at the max)- winter forest service roads to get to my fishing spots. The aired down contact pact between a 31x10.5 and a 33x9.5 should be pretty similar. Most of the increase in contact patch size comes from the increase in length of the patch, not width.
Last edited by Alex 400; 12-15-2008 at 11:49 AM.
#68
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Back in New York City!
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm looking for traction in less than 2 feet of snow (at the max)- winter forest service roads to get to my fishing spots. The aired down contact pact between a 31x10.5 and a 33x9.5 should be pretty similar. Most of the increase in contact patch size comes from the increase in length of the patch, not width.
#69
Registered User
Just to let you guys know, I went to the Home Depot and spent 5 bucks on a razor knife and a box of blades. When I got home it took me all of 40 minutes to sipe the rear two tires, 3 sipes per lug each about 1/4 inch deep. I would have gone with 5 sipes each but the lugs on these tires are only about 3 inches long and I didn't want to risk making too thin slices of tire and risk pieces flaking off. Besides, I just gave each larger lug 3 new grabby spots. If I have 50 lugs on the tire I now have 150 extra grabby thingies. Oh and I only did the lugs in the center. I left the outsides (closest to the sidewalls) alone and can always run one sipe down those if I feel the need.
I'll do the front and the spare tomorrow when I get a chance.
These are the tires I have.
I'll do the front and the spare tomorrow when I get a chance.
These are the tires I have.
Last edited by Junkers88; 12-15-2008 at 01:56 PM.
#70
Registered User
Dangit I wish I lived near you. I'd love to hit some remote fishing spots, or just go see some water that isn't nasty and smelling of 2 cycle boat fuel.
#71
I ran a set of 33.9.50's on my old '84 when stationed in Alaska and upstate NY...winter/Daily driving traction was outstanding.
I don't remember the brand (10 years ago) but the tread pattern was very similar (kind of a good compromise between and AT and MT) to what I have for a spare on my '81, something from Les Schwab. They had a complete set, should have bought all four
I don't remember the brand (10 years ago) but the tread pattern was very similar (kind of a good compromise between and AT and MT) to what I have for a spare on my '81, something from Les Schwab. They had a complete set, should have bought all four
#72
Registered User
Thread Starter
#73
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Back in New York City!
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
im shaking with jealousy! BFG AT's, a hi-lift jack, a couple long pull straps, and a bag of accessories for the jack, and you should be set. I wouldnt want to be in 'not even 2-stroker land' and have some sort of a stuck-issue with no hope of getting out. Sure is a hell of a lot cheaper than a winch, and if you know your winching principals, can be a real life-saver. Not to say you couldnt feed yourself indefinately out there! sheez! look at those fish! I'm going to go sooth my anger with some violent video games!
#74
Registered User
Thread Starter
im shaking with jealousy! BFG AT's, a hi-lift jack, a couple long pull straps, and a bag of accessories for the jack, and you should be set. I wouldnt want to be in 'not even 2-stroker land' and have some sort of a stuck-issue with no hope of getting out. Sure is a hell of a lot cheaper than a winch, and if you know your winching principals, can be a real life-saver. Not to say you couldnt feed yourself indefinately out there! sheez! look at those fish! I'm going to go sooth my anger with some violent video games!
Jam a floor mat underneath the tire and you can inch your out of a stuck. Kind of ghetto, but it works (albeit slowly).
The picture of my truck is after a week or two of no snow, thus its been packed down to two ruts. Powdery fresh snow on top of that is often what stops me in my tracks.
Here are some more fish pics while I'm at it.
#75
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Back in New York City!
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't mean just jacking up your tire and throwing a handful of kitty litter underneath, thats on-road been-plowed-into-a-parking-spot kind of rescue. I mean using it as a winch. Here's a link to a little tutorial: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xldBPnzohtI
#76
Registered User
Thread Starter
I don't mean just jacking up your tire and throwing a handful of kitty litter underneath, thats on-road been-plowed-into-a-parking-spot kind of rescue. I mean using it as a winch. Here's a link to a little tutorial: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xldBPnzohtI
#77
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Back in New York City!
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have the 48" one too. I like it cus I'm not jacked a foot in the air and I can keep the stupid thing in my trunk easily for secure urban parking.
#78
Registered User
Thread Starter
#79
Registered User