Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

SS 1.2 or SS 7.2?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-18-2008, 03:29 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
B. Graves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cocoa, FL.
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SS 1.2 or SS 7.2?

What is the difference in the 2 lift kits? One says you need new bumpers and other crap. One says stock is good. Theyre the same price too. I dont do that much hardcore offroading like some of you do. I just basically want a sweet looking lift kit that rides more like a truck than my 4Runner rides. I havent got stuck with my stock suspension yet either. So, that should tell you that I dont do that much bad stuff. I live in Florida so i dont deal with rocks and crap, just sugar sand and mud. Lots of mud. That deep, mucky, nasty suck you in mud.

Id like to run 33s with no body lift. will they work with the 7.2 or thr 1.2?
Old 11-18-2008, 03:49 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
TC4RNR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: used to be so. cal. now Indy
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by B. Graves
Id like to run 33s with no body lift. will they work with the 7.2 or thr 1.2?

if you dont' carry bunch of crap when going out wheeling, take the 7.2 and 32" tires, you are good to go. you will need to do more work for the 33" tires, plus it sucks gas $$$. save some money to get the Tundra brake upgrade.

most popular 32" size is 265/75R16.

Last edited by TC4RNR; 11-18-2008 at 03:51 PM.
Old 11-18-2008, 04:21 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
MadCityRich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
7.2 is good all around. The ride is pretty decent - better than a truck, so maybe you won't be happy!

For the 1.2 you'll have taller rear springs. It'll give you a jacked up look, which is why SS recommends having more weight, like with a rear bumper, to help keep it tame. I don't know if there are any safety issues with the taller rear springs if you don't have a lot of rear weight.

7.2 is a nice level lift. Good to go. I'm a satisfied customer.

MadCityRich
Old 11-18-2008, 08:57 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
B. Graves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cocoa, FL.
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well, i dont have much crap in mine. just a jack and some tools. i do want a level one though. i cant stand the rear being higher than the front. sitting a tad nose high is ok but not with the rear higher. i wont be using it for a dd too much longer either so gas isnt an issue. i want another truck fro a daily driver and my 4Runner is gonna be a toy for messing around with in the woods. its getting up there in mileage and stuff. still rund and drives great though. i want to get some kind of lift and lock at least the rear. maybe a snorkel too. thanks for the help guys. appreciate it.
Old 11-19-2008, 06:56 AM
  #5  
Contributing Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Rock Slide's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: B'ham, AL
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Feel free to check out pics of my 4Runner. I've got 32's, the 7.1 lift (which has since been updated to the 7.2 lift) and few extra goodies. Just click the "my profile" link in my sig to see my photos.

I've been very satisfied with the lift. Granted, I'd like to upgrade to the 1.2 lift at some point, but that's a LONG way off.
Old 11-19-2008, 02:46 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
B. Graves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cocoa, FL.
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how bout you just sell me your 4Runner. j/k, thats the nicest 4Runner ive ever seen. that is one sick ride man. your profile think is now my new guide for my 4Runner.
Old 11-19-2008, 05:27 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
B. Graves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cocoa, FL.
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you know, i was thinking earlier, would i be better off getting the 1.2 since i plan on getting a roof rack and putting a spare matching tire and wheel up there? ill have that, the biggest hitch you can put on a runner, and i have a lot of tools and a jack and stuff in the back of it. that spare tire though weighs more than or at least close to what a bumper would weigh right?
Old 11-19-2008, 06:12 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
crolison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 2,571
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
GO big, if you go small you'll end up wanting more later.

I suggest 255/85/16s for your tires.
Old 11-19-2008, 06:17 PM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
B. Graves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cocoa, FL.
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i like them to stick out on each side some though. i cant stand narrow tires.

i do think ill go big though. if i have to, i can add a bumper, i mean, its not like i dont want one anyway.
Old 11-20-2008, 03:22 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
GSGALLANT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 1,756
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by B. Graves
... i do want a level one though. i cant stand the rear being higher than the front. sitting a tad nose high is ok but not with the rear higher.
Originally Posted by B. Graves
you know, i was thinking earlier, would i be better off getting the 1.2 since i plan on getting a roof rack and putting a spare matching tire and wheel up there? ill have that, the biggest hitch you can put on a runner, and i have a lot of tools and a jack and stuff in the back of it. that spare tire though weighs more than or at least close to what a bumper would weigh right?
If your are now contemplating the 1.2, you have to change your mind from the comments you made above. You will still be sitting higher in the rear, even with the stuff you say you will be adding to your 4Runner in the future.

However, slightly higher in the rear looks way better than slightly higher in the front (IMO)... and it is better to have the rear higher than the front for offroading.

I don't have an aftermarket rear bumper, but I do have a class III hitch and sliders. I went with the 1.2 and couldn't be happier. Here is a pic of my 4Runner right after the install. The rear has since settled a bit.


Last edited by GSGALLANT; 11-20-2008 at 03:31 AM.
Old 11-20-2008, 05:57 AM
  #11  
Contributing Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Rock Slide's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: B'ham, AL
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If you choose the 1.2 kit, you'll have a bit of rake (rear end sitting higher than the front). However, the LC coils in the rear are great for offroading (they will settle a bit too after some time). Plus, if you decide to add a custom rear bumper and/or other accessories that might add some extra weight to the rear end, it will bring the rear end down a tad. Thus making the vehicle sit closer to a more level stance and not having such a "rake-ish" as before.

If you choose the 7.2 kit, it will sit level right out of the box. However, if you add a custom rear bumper and other heavy accessories, you'll cause the rear to sag a bit below the front, thus not providing as much flex off road.

With that said, you do realize the only difference between the 2 kits, are the rear coils. Meaning, you could opt for the 7.2 kit now and upgrade to the LC coils at a later date. Then your 7.2 kit, magically becomes a 1.2 kit . This was the reason I chose the 7.2 kit over the 1.2 kit.

At the moment, I do not need the extra rear lift the LC coils provide. I know the limits of my 4Runner and don't go places off road I know it can't handle. If I ever manage to save up enough $$ for a custom rear bumper, I'll go with the LC coils at that time. For now, the 7.2 kit meets my needs perfectly.

Last edited by Rock Slide; 11-20-2008 at 05:59 AM.
Old 11-20-2008, 06:02 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Jay204's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba Canada
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At the moment, I do not need the extra rear lift the LC coils provide. I know the limits of my 4Runner and don't go places off road I know it can't handle. If I ever manage to save up enough $$ for a custom rear bumper, I'll go with the LC coils at that time. For now, the 7.2 kit meets my needs perfectly.
Awee come on rockslide your loaded

7.2 sounds right for you, you can always upgrade at a later time like previously stated. I will soon be installing the 7.2
Old 11-20-2008, 06:14 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
hector200sx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: tempe, az
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i plan to do a lot of towing this summer i was thinking i would go with the 1.2
Old 11-21-2008, 11:36 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
mpavolka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You would be happy with either. The OME springs are stiffer and more progressive than the land cruiser ones, therefore they ride a little more like a truck. However I think you sacrafice a little ride quality and tends to not be as limber off-roading. I have OME 891's and they will hold whatever weight I throw at them. I went camping this summer, with four people, gear, clothes, and towing a 1000 lb Sea-Doo and it sat level.

The downside though is I don't think you can run 33's without a little rubbing or trimming. My 32's work great with mine, however once I was turned and hit a bumb pretty hard and they did rub. But the front of the 1.2 and 7.2 I believe are the same so it might not make much of a difference. My next tires will probably be 33's and I'll just make them fit though.
Old 11-21-2008, 11:43 AM
  #15  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
B. Graves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cocoa, FL.
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok, I may just go with a 1.2. If I do get another spare, Ill remove my stock one so there goes that extra weight.

I personally like the Marlin Crawler Tacoma bumper too. Ill have to see if I can make it fit. It wont weigh very much more than the stock one if it even weighs more. And that gets rid of the tow package.

Last edited by B. Graves; 11-21-2008 at 11:45 AM.
Old 11-21-2008, 08:29 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
jfreisner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Leawood, KS/Fayetteville, AR
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by crolison
GO big, if you go small you'll end up wanting more later.

I suggest 255/85/16s for your tires.
amen.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedRunner_87
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
84
06-01-2021 01:51 PM
Vargntucson
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
0
07-04-2015 12:15 PM
SWPERIC
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
9
10-28-2008 03:01 PM
SWPERIC
Newbie Tech Section
9
08-11-2008 09:03 AM
Taro
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
3
04-08-2008 07:18 PM



Quick Reply: SS 1.2 or SS 7.2?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:56 PM.