Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

Can anyone think of a drawback...

Old 02-20-2005, 01:19 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Phssthpok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The Land of Beer and Coffee
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can anyone think of a drawback...

..to eliminating that hot-water-bath on the underside of the intake manifold on my 20r?

I was thinking about fabbing an intake manifold from scratch (I have access to the needed tools and supplies), but I want to make sure that water passage heating the intake charge isn't a critical part of Toyota's engineering of the 20r's functioning parameters.

I understand the cold run benefits, and how the water passage feeds the choke assembly, but I can work arond the choke problem, and everything I've ever been taught was to keep the air/fuel mixture as cool as possible for better perfomance/efficiency once the engine warms up. (I blocked the exhaust crossovers on my 383 RoadRunner, and insulated the fuel rails on my Sebring) I also want to eliminate as many superflous ports, and openings on the manifold as I can. Since the truck is a '77 I no longer need worry about emissions inspections, and the less stuf to go wrong.. well.. you get the idea.
Old 02-20-2005, 02:32 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
kyle_22r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 3,981
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
i think that the benefits wouldn't be too great, as the manifold gets pretty hot on its own just from the head! i think that it would be time and effort better spent on other things such as a better carburetor(the 20R unit is a piece of junk) or port work

the only way i can see to practically delete it would be to go to sidedraft carburetors
Old 02-20-2005, 04:17 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Phssthpok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The Land of Beer and Coffee
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Suggestions for a replacement carb? I've seen the webber 32/36, and 38/38's mentioned quite a bit, but I fear they may be a tad too much for the 20r. Idealy I'd find something in the boneyard that I could rebuild fairly cheep.

I was thinking if I isolated the plenum from the head, then heat transfer could be minimized with airflow past the runners. Something like this:

only desigened for use with a carb, not as a F.I. set up.
Old 02-20-2005, 04:24 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
jimbo74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Nor*Cal
Posts: 6,590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the 32/36 should be good.. and about too much carb, you can detune it for precise performance to fit your needs...
Old 02-20-2005, 05:15 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
kyle_22r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 3,981
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
a 32/36 is actually smaller than a 22R carb! the 22R only has 200CC more displacement than a 20R...i dislike the adapters that webers use on toyota engines, they're a leaky 2 piece design that never seems to seal right.

a good junkyard carb would be a 22R carb. you can buy an adapter plate from LC engineering to use it on your manifold. 22Rs are electric choke instead of water choke like a 20R. really easy to rig up, only 3 wires, 2 are switched to your ignition(hot coil wire does the trick) and 1 is a ground
Old 02-20-2005, 06:43 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Phssthpok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The Land of Beer and Coffee
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Back to the original question... is there a drawback to eliminating the water passage under the manifold?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tacoma Dude
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
15
03-17-2004 08:03 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Can anyone think of a drawback...



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:43 AM.