Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

Bilstein 5100 Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-10-2015, 07:51 AM
  #1  
83
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
83's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Montana
Posts: 4,588
Received 125 Likes on 101 Posts
Bilstein 5100 Question

I know, there are pages and pages of discussion about these...which is part of the problem. Tons of discussion but without sitting down for a few hours of reading, I haven't seen my question addressed with just skimming.

I'm still happy with my decision to buy these, but for some reason I thought both the fronts and backs were adjustable. But only the fronts are.

Trucks and 4Runners alike have an issue with rear end sag. So what's the thinking behind a built-in method to raise the front, but not rear suspension? I figured I'd keep the front at stock height and just bring up the rear a tiny bit. Instead I'll just be keeping everything stock.

Either way these will be a good upgrade to the truck, but I'm a little dissapointed that the rears aren't adjustable...
Old 10-11-2015, 09:22 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
SharpStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fletcher Hills, CA
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's a design thing.

The perch incorporated on a coil over is what enables that adjustability -adjustable perch = adjustable height. No perch, no adjustability.

The 5100s are great. I run Tundra 5100s on my 4R. With the saggy ass in back, I use OME 891s with OE Dodge 2500 front shocks. Of course - go figure - those OME 891s are slowly sagging. Guess it's a Toyota thing. Gives 'em charm.

STICK
Old 10-12-2015, 05:41 AM
  #3  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
skypilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Peekskill, NY
Posts: 1,151
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
They ride stiff. I smoke rear shocks every couple of years, the heat just kills them.
Old 10-12-2015, 08:39 AM
  #4  
83
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
83's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Montana
Posts: 4,588
Received 125 Likes on 101 Posts
Gotcha. I just didn't realize there were so many people interested in raising the front. I like the rear a little higher. But I guess there are compatible with small lifts, so that's part of their popularity.

I just had a shop swap the front coils from the old ones to new ones, so we'll see how it rides one I get the fronts back on & can drive it.
Old 05-10-2016, 11:06 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
SharpStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fletcher Hills, CA
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you like the back to ride high and don't haul much, the FJ80 front spring swap raises the rear of the 4Runner more than the 890/891 option.

STICK
Old 05-22-2016, 11:59 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
wheels&more's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can also use OME lift spring for the FJ80. Using springs is a cheap and effective to lift the rear although will sag under load.
Old 05-23-2016, 07:36 AM
  #7  
Contributing Member
iTrader: (1)
 
KZN185W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,234
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
with the front at stock height, the rake would be too much if he will use the LC80 springs. I would recommend that the OP install new the 1999-2000 SR5 Highlander Edition rear springs as those will provide a 1-inch lift over the stock height.

Originally Posted by SharpStick
If you like the back to ride high and don't haul much, the FJ80 front spring swap raises the rear of the 4Runner more than the 890/891 option.

STICK
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DeathCougar
Vehicles - Parting Out
54
04-01-2018 11:29 PM
jashoeuh
Newbie Tech Section
19
11-26-2017 07:01 AM
Shagool22
Offroad Tech
1
08-14-2015 12:24 AM
Gevo
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
6
07-29-2015 11:15 AM
gmonnie123
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
2
07-26-2015 02:44 PM



Quick Reply: Bilstein 5100 Question



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:34 AM.