Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

2.4 Vs. 2.7

Old 03-03-2009, 06:54 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
johnperrone11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Traverse City, Michigan
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2.4 Vs. 2.7

Hey guys, I've been tooling around this forum for a while to get info and ideas, but I'm not an avid thread writer. I can usually find what I need by searching. But this time I'm asking for help.
I recently sold my cruiser and am looking for a good Tacoma. I want a 4cyl and most of what I am finding out there is the 2.7 litre. Does anybody have any input on this motor? Is it just a stroked out 2.4? Are they as reliable as the 2.4? A buddy of mine had a 2.7 and he didn't really like; he ended up trading it for a 3.4 model.
Does anyone have any arguements for either engine?
Old 03-03-2009, 06:58 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
4ondflr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what year 2.4 are you talking about? the newer 2.4 that usually comes in the 2wd has like 140hp and the 2.7 has like 150hp. i have never had an issue with my 2.7
Old 03-03-2009, 07:16 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
NwRunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Woodinville, Washington
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ive had 2 Yotas with the 2.7 and i love it. On my 4Runner i flipped it at 45MPH, rolled it back over, tightened the alt belt and started it up, the motor is still running amazing.

On my Taco i just bought, the guy hadnt preformed any matinence in more than a year and there was only 2 of the 5 quarts of oil in the motor and barely any antifreeze. I drained the oil and it looked like black sand, i thought for sure the motor was toast. A couple cans of seafoam and 6k miles later, i havent had a single problem.

The only problem i have had with the 2.7 is the exhuast manifold cracking.
Old 03-03-2009, 08:46 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
scuba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 11,338
Received 120 Likes on 59 Posts
NW, You need to post up more, I totally keep forgetting thats you, then read a new post about you flipping your runner, and am like...OH YEAAA. 2.7 FTW. And yea, 2.4 is only in 2wd
Old 03-03-2009, 10:47 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
96redtoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Merritt Island FL
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
the 2.4 and the 2.7 are the same block but the 2.7 is just a bored out version.

great motor would not trade it for anything (well maybe a super charged 3.4)
Old 03-03-2009, 12:16 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
scuba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 11,338
Received 120 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by 96redtoy
the 2.4 and the 2.7 are the same block but the 2.7 is just a bored out version.

great motor would not trade it for anything (well maybe a super charged 3.4)
Great minds think alike
Old 03-03-2009, 12:32 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
TOYOTA 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: oregon
Posts: 2,799
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
uhh, they put the 2.4's in 4wd's also!\

anyhoo, i love my 2.7. good power (for a 4banger) decent mileage.

i have a 125k and the only thing i have to complain about is a cracked manifold. but i replaced it with stainless header now all is well
Old 03-03-2009, 02:38 PM
  #8  
Donny, you're out of your element
Staff
iTrader: (23)
 
DeathCougar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 17,689
Received 53 Likes on 34 Posts
They did NOT put a 2.4L 2RZ in a 4wd, ever.

We are talking Tacomas here, not the 2.4L 22RE.

The 2.4L 2RZ was used only in 2WD Non-prerunner Tacomas
The 2.7L 3RZ was used in 4WD, and PreRunner models, as well as 4Runners and T100 trucks.

Despite being an interference chain drive motor, the 3RZ (2.7L) is pretty good. LC Engineering has even figured out a way to get 1200hp from these engines. They are fairly bulletproof, with regular maintinence.
Old 03-03-2009, 03:54 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
TOYOTA 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: oregon
Posts: 2,799
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
thanks for the correction DC!
i thought some of the early single cab 4x4's came with the 2rz.
did some of the earlier 2.7's use a dizzy? if so that would explain my mix up
Old 03-03-2009, 04:13 PM
  #10  
Donny, you're out of your element
Staff
iTrader: (23)
 
DeathCougar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 17,689
Received 53 Likes on 34 Posts
The tacoma 2RZ and 3RZ used a distributor from 1995.5-1997. They went to distributorless coil pack ignition in 1998.
Old 03-03-2009, 04:19 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
TOYOTA 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: oregon
Posts: 2,799
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
ahh ok, thats what had me confused. i thought the 2.7 had always used coil packs.

thanks for the info!
Old 03-03-2009, 06:30 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
96redtoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Merritt Island FL
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
got a dizzy under my hood
Old 03-03-2009, 06:33 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
scuba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 11,338
Received 120 Likes on 59 Posts
An an early front fascia that isnt as pretty as the rest




Old 03-03-2009, 06:39 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
crolison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 2,571
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I got coil pack in my 97
Old 03-03-2009, 06:47 PM
  #15  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
johnperrone11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Traverse City, Michigan
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks you guys. It sounds like the 2.7 is a good motor. I've been looking at a couple '97's to blow my tax returns on; both of them have 2.7's. Can't wait to get another Toy.
Old 03-03-2009, 06:48 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
raydouble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Rochester, Washington
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by crolison
I got coil pack in my 97
So does my buddy........ I heard that throughout 97 they had both style
ignitions.
His is an 4/97 if I remember correct.
Old 03-03-2009, 09:50 PM
  #17  
Donny, you're out of your element
Staff
iTrader: (23)
 
DeathCougar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 17,689
Received 53 Likes on 34 Posts
The dizzy was used through 5/97 for the 2.4L 2rz, and through 12/96 in the 2.7 3RZ IIRC.

When the front end designed changed to the composite headlights, they changed the engine to the coil pack style in the 2WD. You CAN find the coil pack sealed beam front end, but it is pretty rare since they changed the front end 1/2 way through 97

Last edited by DeathCougar; 03-04-2009 at 07:24 AM.
Old 03-03-2009, 10:35 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
raydouble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Rochester, Washington
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DeathCougar
The dizzy was used through 5/95 IIRC. When the front end designed changed to the composite headlights, they changed the engine to the coil pack style.
97?
Also my buddies is 97, coil pack w/ sealed beam headlights.
Old 03-04-2009, 05:37 AM
  #19  
Registered User
 
96redtoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Merritt Island FL
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by scuba
An an early front fascia that isnt as pretty as the rest




well the grill is now flat back and looks sick

An my lights will never get foggy like yours will

I win
Old 03-04-2009, 06:18 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
scuba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 11,338
Received 120 Likes on 59 Posts





Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 2.4 Vs. 2.7



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:38 PM.