Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

Gear oil for manual transmissions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-2017, 09:07 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
JJ'89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Fresno
Posts: 323
Received 50 Likes on 40 Posts
Originally Posted by irv
I know that this is a topic that looks like it's been discussed pretty extensively online. Although market options of gear oils have changed a bit since many of the threads I've looked at.

From my searching it definitely looks like Redline GL4 MT-90 is the most preferred and recommended gear oil for our manual transmissions.

I understand that GL4 is recommended over GL5. Seems like GL4 is said to be better for internal brass components.

Other than Redline, what may be a second best option that isn't quite as expensive? Anyone used this Sta Lube oil? https://www.amazon.com/Sta-Lube-SL24.../dp/B000M8RYMC

It is a GL4 oil but is 85w90 rather than the recommended 75w90 or 80w90 that our transmissions call for.
I used Sta-Lube in the 4spd Muncie and the Positraction rear axle in my '65 Chevelle, back in the 60's and 70's. GL4 for the trans and GL5 for the axle. I topped-off the gear drive in my roto-tiller yesterday, GL4. I buy it at a local hardware store. The big chain auto supplies probably don't carry GL4. Sta-lube is OK. You can pay more for a name and glowing testimonials. I won't.
Old 04-18-2017, 05:49 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
Charchee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by millball
Charchee, you are much too kind.

I defer to your experience with oil analysis, and I agree about there being little or no difference in metallic wear products regardless of different type oil usage in components that have seen long service...

It is only the enhanced slickness of GL-5 oils that is the bugaboo of well worn syncro trannys.
Hey, it's answers like that one that make you one of the great ones. These oil grade / brand discussions can go on for a dozen pages. That one sentence pretty well sums the whole thing up. Makes perfect sense. Based on that, I'll fill mine with GL-4 at my next change.
Old 04-19-2017, 05:33 AM
  #23  
Registered User
 
Harold Of The Rocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Okanagan, BC
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've read this thread over a few times, and the linked paper discussing GL4 vs. GL5. Great insight and I've learned more about oil then I thought was possible. It also prompted me to visit my local auto parts store. No GL4 available, only Gl5. Also looked into the 93 FSM and it suggested GL5. It seems almost counter intuitive to run oil that auto parts stores and the FSM don't list/carry. However, on what I've read here, I'm sold on the GL4
Old 04-20-2017, 08:42 AM
  #24  
Registered User
 
Hammel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Far West Texas
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't get to drop in to this forum quite as often as I'd like, but man when I do... The subject may get discussed extensively but I am very glad it does. Read all the posts on here. Checked and read links. Now to buy the oil. My question for you all though is, on a 13 tundra with nearly 100k, what would you lean towards? gl4 or 5? TIA
Old 04-20-2017, 10:15 AM
  #25  
Registered User
 
spddm0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Colorado
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I found it interesting that the Toyota FSM's (the 1988 and 1993) calls for GL-4 or GL-5. Typically, I trust Toyota without question. The manuals sometimes have misprints, but other than that I expect they know what they are talking about. As I begin to think back, I'm trying to remember where I decided that I needed GL-4 (other than my Nissan Xterras). I build 2nd gen Toyota MR2 Turbos too, and now I look back at the FSM, it also calls for Gl-4 or GL-5. ??

Hmmm...Was it somewhere later down the road that someone determined the GL-5 additives were damaging the yellow metals? Was Toyota NOT aware of this, or are there simply no soft yellow metals in the manual transmissions (transaxles)? I'm a little surprised that Toyota would suggest either was ok to use, if it wasn't. I do remember when we started using a higher performance oil (Redline MT-90), that the GL-4 conversation came up. Perhaps that was the beginning of the conversation - almost 20 years ago.

I have a later model E-153 from a Toyota Solara in my MR2, and I opened and built that one myself, but it was forever ago and I don't remember looking for soft yellow metal parts. I can't find the FSM for the Solara, but I imagine it also calls for either GL-4 or GL-5.

I'll also continue to use the GL-4 for now, but...interesting discussion...
Old 04-20-2017, 12:06 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
millball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Southern Arizona
Posts: 4,104
Received 603 Likes on 441 Posts
Originally Posted by Hammel
I don't get to drop in to this forum quite as often as I'd like, but man when I do... The subject may get discussed extensively but I am very glad it does. Read all the posts on here. Checked and read links. Now to buy the oil. My question for you all though is, on a 13 tundra with nearly 100k, what would you lean towards? gl4 or 5? TIA
GL-5 spec oils offer advantage in hypoid gear differentials, but their enhanced slickness is not needed to lube the helical gears found in trannies.

That enhanced slickness is sometimes found to make worn, hi-mileage syncros less effective, which contributes to more trouble when shifting at mismatched engine/tranny speeds.

If it were my truck, I'd use the GL-4 in the tranny and GL-5 in the diffs.

Although I do run all mine like this, syncros don't really matter that much to me, because I double-clutch 'em all like they were sliding gear crashboxes anyway. Old habits are hard to break.

Last edited by millball; 04-20-2017 at 02:36 PM.
Old 04-20-2017, 06:14 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
nathansarli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Transmission pops out of gear in first

I have a 93 pickup V6 4X4 5spd that is beginning to have some transmission issues as it occasionally comes out of gear when I stop on a slope. I'm currently running Valvoline Synpower 75W90. Is it possible that running a different fluid might fix this problem?
Old 04-20-2017, 06:48 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
millball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Southern Arizona
Posts: 4,104
Received 603 Likes on 441 Posts
Originally Posted by nathansarli
I have a 93 pickup V6 4X4 5spd that is beginning to have some transmission issues as it occasionally comes out of gear when I stop on a slope. I'm currently running Valvoline Synpower 75W90. Is it possible that running a different fluid might fix this problem?
It is very unlikely that different gear oil will help, or solve your issue.

Trannies that won't stay in gear usually require overhaul. Your issue might be due to several potential faults including, excessive main or countershaft endplay from worn bearings, bent, or worn shift fork, worn or damaged syncro or sliding dog... ect. Sorry.
Old 04-20-2017, 09:43 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
millball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Southern Arizona
Posts: 4,104
Received 603 Likes on 441 Posts
Originally Posted by spddm0n
I found it interesting that the Toyota FSM's (the 1988 and 1993) calls for GL-4 or GL-5. Typically, I trust Toyota without question. The manuals sometimes have misprints, but other than that I expect they know what they are talking about. As I begin to think back, I'm trying to remember where I decided that I needed GL-4 (other than my Nissan Xterras). I build 2nd gen Toyota MR2 Turbos too, and now I look back at the FSM, it also calls for Gl-4 or GL-5. ??

Hmmm...Was it somewhere later down the road that someone determined the GL-5 additives were damaging the yellow metals? Was Toyota NOT aware of this, or are there simply no soft yellow metals in the manual transmissions (transaxles)? I'm a little surprised that Toyota would suggest either was ok to use, if it wasn't. I do remember when we started using a higher performance oil (Redline MT-90), that the GL-4 conversation came up. Perhaps that was the beginning of the conversation - almost 20 years ago.

I have a later model E-153 from a Toyota Solara in my MR2, and I opened and built that one myself, but it was forever ago and I don't remember looking for soft yellow metal parts. I can't find the FSM for the Solara, but I imagine it also calls for either GL-4 or GL-5.

I'll also continue to use the GL-4 for now, but...interesting discussion...
I would remark that back in the late 1970s' or very early 1980s' when I was building and running air cooled buses and bugs, VW was warning against the use Of GL-5 spec oils in their transaxles.

This was more than 35 years ago.
Old 04-20-2017, 09:53 PM
  #30  
Registered User
 
Charchee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by spddm0n
I found it interesting that the Toyota FSM's (the 1988 and 1993) calls for GL-4 or GL-5. Typically, I trust Toyota without question. The manuals sometimes have misprints, but other than that I expect they know what they are talking about. As I begin to think back, I'm trying to remember where I decided that I needed GL-4 (other than my Nissan Xterras). I build 2nd gen Toyota MR2 Turbos too, and now I look back at the FSM, it also calls for Gl-4 or GL-5. ??

Hmmm...Was it somewhere later down the road that someone determined the GL-5 additives were damaging the yellow metals? Was Toyota NOT aware of this, or are there simply no soft yellow metals in the manual transmissions (transaxles)? I'm a little surprised that Toyota would suggest either was ok to use, if it wasn't. I do remember when we started using a higher performance oil (Redline MT-90), that the GL-4 conversation came up. Perhaps that was the beginning of the conversation - almost 20 years ago.

I have a later model E-153 from a Toyota Solara in my MR2, and I opened and built that one myself, but it was forever ago and I don't remember looking for soft yellow metal parts. I can't find the FSM for the Solara, but I imagine it also calls for either GL-4 or GL-5.

I'll also continue to use the GL-4 for now, but...interesting discussion...
May be based on application. I know a Caterpillar machine's maintenance manual will show upwards of five different recommended fluids for an axle or transmission based on temperature, ground speed, and load conditions. An excavator that normally uses HYDO-10 hydraulic oil is recommended to run 30 Weight Diesel engine oil in the hydraulics if it has a hammer pinned to it.

I would imagine the GL-5 would be the fluid to use if you were pulling a heavy trailer down county roads at low speeds in a constant third gear type application, while GL-4 would be the stuff for city driving where you are shifting every 15 seconds under no additional load.
Old 04-21-2017, 07:24 AM
  #31  
Registered User
 
fdp101452's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Woodward, Oklahoma
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 19 Posts
I'm not taking a stand on either gl4 or gl5, but I find this whole thing interesting. My 90sr5, I suppose came with gl5, I don't know that, I just suppose that it did. I do know that for the last 20yrs it has had gl5 in it. The pickup now has 200k on it and it still shifts fine. I live in a small town with lots of stop and go so it gets shifted lots. I would think that by this time and miles that if gl5 was a big problem, I would have that problem and I don't seem to. I used gl5 in the past because I had never heard of this before. I intend to use gl4 the next time I change it based on this. Your thoughts?
Old 04-22-2017, 07:56 AM
  #32  
Registered User
 
Harold Of The Rocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Okanagan, BC
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fdp101452
I'm not taking a stand on either gl4 or gl5, but I find this whole thing interesting. My 90sr5, I suppose came with gl5, I don't know that, I just suppose that it did. I do know that for the last 20yrs it has had gl5 in it. The pickup now has 200k on it and it still shifts fine. I live in a small town with lots of stop and go so it gets shifted lots. I would think that by this time and miles that if gl5 was a big problem, I would have that problem and I don't seem to. I used gl5 in the past because I had never heard of this before. I intend to use gl4 the next time I change it based on this. Your thoughts?
As a few folks have said, it all comes down to personal choice. I've taken heed of this discussion and will go with GL4 during my change. If it doesn't work for you, or if you feel it isn't worth the increase in cost (gl4 is expensive), gl5 is still readily available and inexpensive.
Old 04-27-2017, 04:18 AM
  #33  
Registered User
 
gsp4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mogadore, Ohio
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Harold Of The Rocks
I've read this thread over a few times, and the linked paper discussing GL4 vs. GL5. Great insight and I've learned more about oil then I thought was possible. It also prompted me to visit my local auto parts store. No GL4 available, only Gl5. Also looked into the 93 FSM and it suggested GL5. It seems almost counter intuitive to run oil that auto parts stores and the FSM don't list/carry. However, on what I've read here, I'm sold on the GL4
My guess is that all auto parts stores used to carry gl-4 gear oil back when more cars had manual gearboxes. I know Pennzoil used to make one, don't know if they do anymore.

I filled with the Sta-lube stuff and have no complaints. Got it for $25/gallon at napa. I've read multiple stories that it wouldn't shift well at freezing temps, but that wasn't the case. Had it running down to 20° which is the coldest it got this winter and had no problems to speak of.

For comparison purposes I've also ran the much more expensive gl-4 Redline 75w90 and didn't think it performed any better than Sta-lube.
Old 04-27-2017, 05:30 AM
  #34  
Registered User
 
Harold Of The Rocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Okanagan, BC
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gsp4life
My guess is that all auto parts stores used to carry gl-4 gear oil back when more cars had manual gearboxes. I know Pennzoil used to make one, don't know if they do anymore.

I filled with the Sta-lube stuff and have no complaints. Got it for $25/gallon at napa. I've read multiple stories that it wouldn't shift well at freezing temps, but that wasn't the case. Had it running down to 20° which is the coldest it got this winter and had no problems to speak of.

For comparison purposes I've also ran the much more expensive gl-4 Redline 75w90 and didn't think it performed any better than Sta-lube.
Indeed that Redline is expensive. Did you run it just in your manual transmission or in your diffs and transfer case as well?
Old 04-27-2017, 06:21 AM
  #35  
Registered User
 
gsp4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mogadore, Ohio
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Just in the tranny. You always want gl-5 in the diffs, I forget why at the moment but possibly cause of the extra pressure additives. I had a cheapo gl-5 in the t-case cause it doesn't care what you use. I did read about the potential for mixing, but when I drained both to replace with Sta-lube, the fluids we're still individually red (redline) and yellow (cheapo gl-5).
Old 04-27-2017, 07:08 AM
  #36  
RJR
Registered User
 
RJR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Northern Colorado
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 0
Received 109 Likes on 81 Posts
Originally Posted by gsp4life
Just in the tranny. You always want gl-5 in the diffs, I forget why at the moment but possibly cause of the extra pressure additives. I had a cheapo gl-5 in the t-case cause it doesn't care what you use. I did read about the potential for mixing, but when I drained both to replace with Sta-lube, the fluids we're still individually red (redline) and yellow (cheapo gl-5).
Bevel gear teeth, such as are in your transmission or tcase, are shaped so as to roll across each other when they mesh, with little sliding. On the other hand, the hypoid gear teeth in your diff ring and pinion slide across each other much like a worm gear system. Plus the tooth pressures are higher because the gear reduction is greater at the diff than anywhere else. So the diff needs GL-5 for lower friction and higher pressure capability.
Depending on the tcase model, it may care about what you put in it. The gear driven cases don't care, but the VF1A chain driven case behind the R150 manual tranny has synchronizers to allow for on-the-fly shifting from 2wd to 4wd, and from 4lo to 4hi (but not the other way around). Those synchros will work better with GL-4 in there.
There are oil seals (two, I think) between the transfer case and the transmission, so there shouldn't be any mixing of fluids.
Old 04-27-2017, 11:39 AM
  #37  
irv
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
irv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by gsp4life
My guess is that all auto parts stores used to carry gl-4 gear oil back when more cars had manual gearboxes. I know Pennzoil used to make one, don't know if they do anymore.

I filled with the Sta-lube stuff and have no complaints. Got it for $25/gallon at napa. I've read multiple stories that it wouldn't shift well at freezing temps, but that wasn't the case. Had it running down to 20° which is the coldest it got this winter and had no problems to speak of.

For comparison purposes I've also ran the much more expensive gl-4 Redline 75w90 and didn't think it performed any better than Sta-lube.
Good to hear. I just put a W56 transmission with 150k on it into my 86 pickup and I filled it up with Sta-lube. Shifts perfectly fine to me so far. I live in Maine. So we'll see how it does come winter.
Old 04-27-2017, 12:33 PM
  #38  
Registered User
 
gsp4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mogadore, Ohio
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by irv
Good to hear. I just put a W56 transmission with 150k on it into my 86 pickup and I filled it up with Sta-lube. Shifts perfectly fine to me so far. I live in Maine. So we'll see how it does come winter.
It should be fine. I know you guys get a few minus temp days up there so it might be slow for a minute or two when it's that cold. Do you know about the transmission warm-up trick? Put the t-case in neutral, tranny in 1st and just rev around 2000 rpm for a minute. I had no need to do this myself, but someone on yotatech mentioned it awhile back so thought I'd pass it on.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:34 PM.