Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

Blown 94 v6 4runner, stick to 3.0 or swap to 3.4?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2009, 09:22 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
yota master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blown 94 v6 4runner, stick to 3.0 or swap to 3.4?

Ok so i just bought a 94 v6 3.slow manual 4runner with a

rod knocking so instinctively i ran the motor into the ground

now im ready for a new one. I also have a 98 tacoma i

wrecked with a 3.4 automatic and my question is- what all

would i need to swap my 3.4 into the 4 runner? Or does

anyone have a 3.0 they wanna sell for a reasonable price?
Old 05-13-2009, 09:49 AM
  #2  
Contributing Member
 
UKMyers's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Solano Co, CA Originally a North Idaho Hick
Posts: 4,267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All the tech you ever wanted to know about this swap http://www.offroadsolutions.com/34conversion_auto.html

If you already have a 3.4 motor and tranny I would not think twice about sticking a 3.slow back in it.
Old 05-13-2009, 09:51 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
scuba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 11,338
Received 120 Likes on 59 Posts
3.4


Old 05-13-2009, 10:23 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
904_runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chico, California
Posts: 3,870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
another thing to think about is smog laws in your area.

i did a 3.4 swap and love it, im sure you will too!
Old 05-13-2009, 10:26 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Kiroshu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 2,747
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
up to you, if ya want a good project go to the 3.4, but if you want to do things the right way go OEM....
Old 05-13-2009, 02:57 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
RobD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 2,243
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Kiroshu
up to you, if ya want a good project go to the 3.4, but if you want to do things the right way go OEM....
And by that, he means less power and worse fuel economy...

Sheesh, go with the 3.4. Did mine back in August of '07 and haven't regretted it once.

http://www.andrewzook.com/content/view/22/48/

One of the best resources I've found on it.
Old 05-13-2009, 02:59 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
gatorblue92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Gulf Coast, MS
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you have everything you need for the 3.4 so i say do it
Old 05-13-2009, 03:07 PM
  #8  
totally a bro
Staff
iTrader: (2)
 
vital22re's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: kick yer face
Posts: 8,158
Received 45 Likes on 28 Posts
3.0 its the tits man screw the 3.4!!!! all original baby!!!! nah i'm kiddin. 3.4 is in my opinion a far superior set up than the 3.0. I did mine early this year and its really been great having a motor that feels reliable, gets better gas mileage, gives ya that bump in power, and basically bolts up.
Old 05-13-2009, 03:22 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
wii_tarded's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,063
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The main reason I'd stick with the 3.0 is the difficulty in finding 3.4 parts. If you have the 3.4 with trans, ecu, and drivelines, do the swap.
Old 05-14-2009, 09:15 AM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
yota master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ive been looking around and i dont think i can even use this motor since its from an automatic tranny truck
Old 05-14-2009, 09:54 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
scuba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 11,338
Received 120 Likes on 59 Posts
You'll just have to jumper a couple wires or get a manual tranny ecu..
I have no experience on the swap thats just what I remember reading..

Old 05-14-2009, 09:59 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
vandert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ringgold Ga/Chattanooga Tn
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Of course you can man, are you serious. Do the 3.4 I'm planning on it soon as well, about to do the bodylift in prep for it
Old 05-14-2009, 10:00 AM
  #13  
Contributing Member
 
Tacoclimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Between a rock and a hard place, AZ
Posts: 3,659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kiroshu
up to you, if ya want a good project go to the 3.4, but if you want to do things the right way go OEM....
Says the guy without a 3.4.


Swapping the 3.4 and tranny into your Runner can be done. Whether or not the 3.4 will mate to the manual already attached to your Runner, I don't know.

The site the UKMeyers clipped is teh hawt when it comes to swapparoonies.
Old 05-14-2009, 01:01 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Justinlhc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How much better is the mileage on the 3.4? Maybe there have been problems with the ones I've driven, but I'm not impressed with the power of the 3.4 compared to my 3.0. I have a few minor mods done to my 3.0, but I'd put it against any of the 3.4's I've driven.

I know the 3.4 is a fairly simple swap, but if I were to swap any motor I'd be looking for something with a tad bit more power than the 3.4. Just my opinion though.
Old 05-14-2009, 01:37 PM
  #15  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
yota master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well i know about the wiring of the ecu from automatic to maual tranny but i also heard the 3.4 set up for an automatic cant hold a pilot bearing to be able to hook to a manual tranny, does anyone know anything about this?? does anyone know of what year/ models or whatever will hook up to a manual tranny?
Old 05-14-2009, 02:06 PM
  #16  
Contributing Member
 
Tacoclimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Between a rock and a hard place, AZ
Posts: 3,659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Justinlhc
How much better is the mileage on the 3.4? Maybe there have been problems with the ones I've driven, but I'm not impressed with the power of the 3.4 compared to my 3.0. I have a few minor mods done to my 3.0, but I'd put it against any of the 3.4's I've driven.

I know the 3.4 is a fairly simple swap, but if I were to swap any motor I'd be looking for something with a tad bit more power than the 3.4. Just my opinion though.
With all due respect, the 3.0 is the closest thing to a lemon motor that Toyota ever put out. The head gasket issue is almost legendary, and while I'm sure your 3.0 runs good, I don't know that I'd be so bold to say that it can go up against a 3.4. The 3.4 are darn near bulletproof, have solid aftermarket support, and can be yoked to above 300 rwhp. (With supercharger and fuel mods, of course).

I think for power AND longevity AND durability... the 3.4 wins, hands down.
Old 05-14-2009, 02:30 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
Justinlhc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tacoclimber
With all due respect, the 3.0 is the closest thing to a lemon motor that Toyota ever put out. The head gasket issue is almost legendary, and while I'm sure your 3.0 runs good, I don't know that I'd be so bold to say that it can go up against a 3.4. The 3.4 are darn near bulletproof, have solid aftermarket support, and can be yoked to above 300 rwhp. (With supercharger and fuel mods, of course).

I think for power AND longevity AND durability... the 3.4 wins, hands down.

How long do they last for? Maybe the ones I've driven had some sort of issue? They certainly don't blow my 3.0 away, not anything that would make me want to swap motors that's for damn sure.

From what I can find they only have about ~40 more hp. I just can't justify swapping motors for such a small gain.
Old 05-14-2009, 02:43 PM
  #18  
Contributing Member
 
Tacoclimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Between a rock and a hard place, AZ
Posts: 3,659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Justinlhc
How long do they last for? Maybe the ones I've driven had some sort of issue? They certainly don't blow my 3.0 away, not anything that would make me want to swap motors that's for damn sure.

From what I can find they only have about ~40 more hp. I just can't justify swapping motors for such a small gain.
So you're saying you've raced a few 3.4's?
Old 05-14-2009, 03:24 PM
  #19  
totally a bro
Staff
iTrader: (2)
 
vital22re's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: kick yer face
Posts: 8,158
Received 45 Likes on 28 Posts
all the talk of auto 3.4's not having a pilot bearing hole is crap!!! they have them 904_runner has an auto 3.4 in a manual runner with the auto ecu.
Old 05-14-2009, 05:32 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
Justinlhc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tacoclimber
So you're saying you've raced a few 3.4's?

Haha, no no I've just driven a few. Maybe I just expected more, I dunno? They didn't feel very impressive to me is all I'm saying. I'll see if I can line my buddies 3.4 T100 up with my 3.0 4Runner this weekend. I'm pretty sure my 4Runner would take his T100, but maybe I'm crazy.


Quick Reply: Blown 94 v6 4runner, stick to 3.0 or swap to 3.4?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:53 AM.