Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

Adverse affects of valve tapping question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-13-2010, 05:27 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
xxxtreme22r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA, USA
Posts: 13,574
Received 69 Likes on 48 Posts
Adverse affects of valve tapping question

In a recent thread it was brought up that opening the valve lash can lower your poower curve at the cost of some extra valve noise. My question is (yes I already searched came up with people just complaining about valve noise) what are the drawbacks of extra vavle train noise. I am just thinking of extra wear on the rockershafts on the valve side, the adjuster nuts and valves but how much? Thinking of setting my EB 268 cam to 8 and 10 intake exhaust. Should be 7 and 9. At 7 and 9 I have some valve train noise now (normal I know) mostly at above 2000 RPM hardly any (maybe 1 noisy) at idle when cold and just noticeable when warm. This might not be due to lash but worn rockers and/or shafts. Not really complaining though. Using 10-30 Valvoline DINO. About 1500 miles on rebuild and new complete stock style head/valves from ENGNBLDR new adjuster nuts but reused rockers and shafts that have 175,000 miles on them.

Thanks all.
Old 03-13-2010, 06:46 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
yotarob2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Bryan Tx,
Posts: 1,803
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
subscribed to get an answer, Also thinking of setting mine at .008" & .010".
Old 03-13-2010, 07:03 AM
  #3  
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
mightymouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: high ridge
Posts: 1,756
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
I have the 268 cam and have played with the valve lash a little enough to give an opinion. When i built my motor i neglected to read up on valve lash for the 268 cam and set the lash to stock specs at .008 and .012. It was noisy. After searching and finding the true settings i didn't want to go too far after just recently breaking in the motor so i set the lash at .008 and .010. Sounds and runs perfect no complaints. So i decided to leave it there. It is to my understanding that setting the valve lash tighter will quiet down the chatter made by a after market cam. I could be wrong but i don't think the .001 difference will be noticable enough to promote a change for the better regarding the noisy 22re. My engine sounds like a sewing machine when it's running. Not too much different from the old motor it's just tighter and you can hear the lope from the cam through the exhaust. Just my two cents. Try it but i think it'll get louder the more you loosen the valve lash.
Old 03-13-2010, 08:40 AM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
xxxtreme22r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA, USA
Posts: 13,574
Received 69 Likes on 48 Posts
not really worried about it getting louder, just don't want to "overwear" the already 175,000 valve train and new valves/cam. Forgot to mention I also use lucas as well.
Old 03-13-2010, 09:10 AM
  #5  
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
mightymouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: high ridge
Posts: 1,756
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
I use lucas as well along with royal purple (overkill i know). To be honest try it. Worse case scenario your engine is a little louder. Also ponder this, loose parts cause things to wear faster right? I would venture to guess that if you loosened the valve train too much it would have a worse affect than leaving it at spec or close to spec. Think about taking a big swing with a hammer on an object or a small swing well we all know which is going to have a bigger affect on the piece being struck right? Now scale that down to your valve train ( a stretch i know but bear with me) wouldn't the same thought process apply? Going up to .008 and .010 isn't much and most likely will have little to no affect but just a thought. I would think finding a happy medium would be you best bet so try it. It's not like it's hard to set it back to your original settings if your not happy or comfortable. I'm most likely over thinking it.
Old 03-13-2010, 09:13 AM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
xxxtreme22r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA, USA
Posts: 13,574
Received 69 Likes on 48 Posts
no thats what i was thinking more wear theoretically but not enough to worry about which is why I asked how much more, and going too far will start to have adverse effects i would imagine on how well the engine runs before any problems stat to occur mechanically. wish i just had the lce adjustable cam gear and advance my cam timing back to where it should be and be done with it lol.
Old 03-13-2010, 03:03 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
pruney81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Leadville Colorado
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How much Lucas do you guys use? I get a little more valve noise than I'd like on the occasional dry start. I'm using Castrol 10W30 right now.
Old 03-13-2010, 06:15 PM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
xxxtreme22r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA, USA
Posts: 13,574
Received 69 Likes on 48 Posts
full bottle
Old 03-13-2010, 09:56 PM
  #9  
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
mightymouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: high ridge
Posts: 1,756
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
ditto sub one bottle of lucas for a quart of oil it works wonders. At least that's what i tell myself for such an expensive oil change.
Old 03-15-2010, 12:55 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
abecedarian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Temecula Valley, CA
Posts: 12,723
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Running loose valves? Well, other than taking away from the purpose of using a high rate/duration cam, not much else will happen, for at least a while.
Most cam profiles are designed for a smooth transition from heel to lift, and slop in the train will move the point stress is applied to the cam lobe to a later position in its rotation.

Let me ask this:
If you're riding a bike, when do you put your weight on the downstroke of the pedal? Just slightly after the pedal travels over the top or you wait until the pedal is 1/2 of the way down?
Old 03-15-2010, 03:43 AM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
xxxtreme22r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA, USA
Posts: 13,574
Received 69 Likes on 48 Posts
Didn't say loose, just going from 7 and 9 to 8 and 10. Unless someone wants to trade a hardly used 261 for my 268 so I can try it out. lol.
Old 03-15-2010, 04:43 PM
  #12  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
xxxtreme22r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA, USA
Posts: 13,574
Received 69 Likes on 48 Posts
that's what I am thinking but ENGNBLDR talked me into the 268. now am not too sure if I made the right decision. kinda like the 32/36 vs the 38.
Old 03-15-2010, 11:46 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
abecedarian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Temecula Valley, CA
Posts: 12,723
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by xxxtreme22r
Didn't say loose, just going from 7 and 9 to 8 and 10. Unless someone wants to trade a hardly used 261 for my 268 so I can try it out. lol.
You didn't have to say loose.

But that is what you're doing: increasing the clearance- making the valves more loose.

Increasing the clearance means that the cam applies pressure to the rocker arm at a later point in the camshaft's rotational period, valve lift is reduced, and the valve closes earlier, thus reducing or possibly negating the effects and purpose of the cam.

Last edited by abecedarian; 03-15-2010 at 11:47 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ironmike4x4
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
5
02-03-2016 11:13 AM
thefishguy77
Newbie Tech Section
10
07-30-2015 10:59 AM
Poppie51
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
8
07-23-2015 05:03 PM
Poppie51
Newbie Tech Section
0
07-16-2015 06:16 PM
razorman8669
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
9
07-12-2015 12:13 PM



Quick Reply: Adverse affects of valve tapping question



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:21 AM.