Pre 84 Trucks 1st gen pickups

Cylinder walls

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2017, 05:10 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
farrier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: East Central Missouri
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cylinder walls

Here is a couple pics of my cylinder walls.
I don't see any cross hatching. Is that ok?
I see that the each piston has a notch at the top. Is this a sign of a rebuild?
Also if I look close, I can see tiny debris in between the piston and cylinder wall. Junk from top of piston. Won't vacuum out. If I try to wiggle the piston, I can't get any play side to side. Motor turns over very easy by hand. Ok?
Thanks.
Attached Thumbnails Cylinder walls-100_4319.jpg   Cylinder walls-100_4320.jpg   Cylinder walls-100_4321.jpg   Cylinder walls-100_4322.jpg   Cylinder walls-100_4323.jpg  

Old 04-03-2017, 07:47 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
L5wolvesf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 1,058
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts
A couple things you need to do:
1) measure the bores
2) feel for a ridge along the top of the cylinder

Your sig says 100k miles on an '83 is this correct?
Old 04-03-2017, 08:10 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
farrier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: East Central Missouri
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can pick up a micrometer tomorrow and post readings.
On the top it's not really a ridge, I would say the top 1/8'' or so is a little wider then the actual cylinder bore.
I'm the second owner, bought it with 85,000 with no documentation, but knew the family it came from. So I'm fairly certain that is correct mileage.
Thanks.
Old 04-08-2017, 08:50 AM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
farrier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: East Central Missouri
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well I finally got back to this.
I measured two directions on each bore. North & South, then East & West. If that makes sense. I was only able to get a reading down about a 1/2'' into cylinder.
#1 91.1mm both directions
#2 91.2 both ways
#3 91.2 both ways
#4 91.3 both ways
Seams ok to me?
Old 04-08-2017, 05:21 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
L5wolvesf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 1,058
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by farrier
Well I finally got back to this.
I measured two directions on each bore. North & South, then East & West. If that makes sense. I was only able to get a reading down about a 1/2'' into cylinder.
#1 91.1mm both directions
#2 91.2 both ways
#3 91.2 both ways
#4 91.3 both ways
Seams ok to me?
According to LC Engineering the Stock Bore = 92.0mm
Old 04-08-2017, 09:15 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
millball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Southern Arizona
Posts: 4,099
Received 598 Likes on 438 Posts
If it wasn't burning oil, It's very likely OK.
Old 04-09-2017, 05:23 AM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
farrier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: East Central Missouri
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was putting in a qt every 600 miles but no smoke.
It did have some bad leaks. Oil pan, timing cover/front crank seal, and valve cover mostly.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:05 PM.