Offroad Tech Discussion pertaining to additions or questions which improve off-road ability, recovery and safety, such as suspension, body lifts, lockers etc
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Lifted 3rd Gen With Pics!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-20-2005, 01:55 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
emptypockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Spencer, Iowa
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lifted 3rd Gen With Pics!

Before Picture:


After Pic With 265/70R 16's


After Pic With LT 265/75R 16's


I used the Daystar 2.5" spacer lift, Rancho RSX series shocks and Eldorado ZSR Sport tires. Complete, I spent about a grand doing the mods and as you can see, it looks great!
Old 12-20-2005, 03:35 PM
  #2  
Contributing Member
 
ebelen1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Socal
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow, looks great. I didn't think that the upsize from 70 to 75 would make that much difference. From the pics, it sure makes it seem like the wheel well is filled out much more.
Old 12-20-2005, 03:42 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
emptypockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Spencer, Iowa
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think there's only about an inch and a half difference between the 70 and 75, but it did make a HUGE difference.
Old 12-23-2005, 08:25 AM
  #4  
Contributing Member
 
northfacer581's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: charlotte
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh snow.

definately a solid upgrade. looks much better.
Old 12-23-2005, 08:01 PM
  #5  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
paddlenbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Man, that looks great! I have the *identical* truck and when I saw the after pics I decided 2.5" of lift was too much. With the larger tires, it just looks right now. Guess I need to reconsider lift sizes again...lol

By the way:
265/70R16 = 30.7 inches
265/75R16 = 31.8 inches
285/75R16 = 33.0 inches

All tires have slightly different measurements and the ones I just posted are for the Yokohama Geolandar AT+II.
Old 12-23-2005, 08:11 PM
  #6  
Contributing Member
 
ebelen1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Socal
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by paddlenbike
Man, that looks great! I have the *identical* truck and when I saw the after pics I decided 2.5" of lift was too much. With the larger tires, it just looks right now. Guess I need to reconsider lift sizes again...lol

By the way:
265/70R16 = 30.7 inches
265/75R16 = 31.8 inches
285/75R16 = 33.0 inches

All tires have slightly different measurements and the ones I just posted are for the Yokohama Geolandar AT+II.
If 2.5" is too much, you can't go wrong w/ the PP/Bilstein setup that many people run here. Total suspension lift is about 1 - 1 1/2".

I love my Geolander AT's BTW. I saw a set on a 3rd gen that were 275/75/16 MT's and they looked awesome. I'm thinking this maybe the next set as I don't want a BL to fit the 285's.
Old 12-23-2005, 10:26 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
rockota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by paddlenbike
Man, that looks great! I have the *identical* truck and when I saw the after pics I decided 2.5" of lift was too much. With the larger tires, it just looks right now. Guess I need to reconsider lift sizes again...lol
I'm running 265/75's on my 96 w/o a lift. I agree the 2.5" is more than I want 1"-1.5 MAX.

Let me know what you end up doing, Ken.
Old 12-23-2005, 11:13 PM
  #8  
Contributing Member
 
Fink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 9,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah come on...go for the Tundra/OME lift! It's great!

Fink
Old 12-26-2005, 11:12 AM
  #9  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
paddlenbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by rockota
I'm running 265/75's on my 96 w/o a lift. I agree the 2.5" is more than I want 1"-1.5 MAX.

Let me know what you end up doing, Ken.
Actually I thought his looked great at 2.5", but I am shooting for right at a 2" lift. If I understand the 36 page thread correctly the Tundra coils and Tacoma shocks will provide 1.75" lift up front. Now I need a rear coil to match....perhaps the not-very-well-known OME 906???
Old 12-30-2005, 11:23 AM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
emptypockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Spencer, Iowa
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I contemplated which height lift to go with also. Ultimately, I saw a pic in one of the forums here that help me decide on 2.5". My Runner can go through almost anything and sits noticably higher than stock. I parked beside an older 4wd Suburban and he sat about 1" higher than me is all! Love the mod both in looks and performance!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedRunner_87
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
84
06-01-2021 01:51 PM
jerusry
Axles - Suspensions - Tires - Wheels
1
10-19-2015 05:28 PM
GreatLakesGuy
The Classifieds GraveYard
8
09-04-2015 09:27 AM
93toyoguy
Newbie Tech Section
10
08-02-2015 07:41 PM
coffey50
Offroad Tech
17
07-28-2015 10:55 AM



Quick Reply: Lifted 3rd Gen With Pics!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:59 PM.