03 Tundra - K&N FIPK/Volant "Cold Box"
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03 Tundra - K&N FIPK/Volant "Cold Box"
Everyone,
I have a 2003 Tundra Access Cab SR5 V8 4x4. I have heard and read quite a bit about both the K&N FIPK and the Volant "cold box" (cold air intake mod). Can anyone tell me whether either of these was worth the money spent? and did you modify your exhaust/headers before you used either of these products?
I still have two kids to put through college so I am minding my modification Ps and Qs. Thanks...
I have a 2003 Tundra Access Cab SR5 V8 4x4. I have heard and read quite a bit about both the K&N FIPK and the Volant "cold box" (cold air intake mod). Can anyone tell me whether either of these was worth the money spent? and did you modify your exhaust/headers before you used either of these products?
I still have two kids to put through college so I am minding my modification Ps and Qs. Thanks...
#2
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Long Island
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
K&N
I have the fipk , and I didn't notice much increase . I have learned that they do not recommend it for 02 1/2 or 03 due to a lean fuel response. The software cant compensate for the increased flow.
#4
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wouldn't mind the supercharger if it weren't $3G, but worse than that is that after you install it you have to run 92 octane or above. I think I will stick to getting the TRD exhaust from head to tail, then add a cold box to the intake.
#5
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
K&N
We sell the FIPK system at my dealership but won't sell it to customers it leans out the system to fast and decreases horspower. This is with or without the SC.
Todd
Todd
#6
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: El Paso TX
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
K&N FIPK on a 2000
I have the K&N Fipk on my 2000 V8 Tundra, and I noticed a huge difference. Is there any problems with running that system on this year of truck.
Trending Topics
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FIPK
Notice my previous comments pertaining to leaning the engine out. This is the whole reason we don't, symptoms start with loss of compression and then a new head which is very expensive.
Todd
Todd
#10
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TOR,
That makes sense. Toyota has done a very good job of getting every bit of power out of the stock engine with changes to the engine control module program.
How about that supercharger? will it really require the use of high octane gasoline? With such a large increase in HP and torque will the Toyota A/T and differential handle the added stress? I have heard some folks have had to replace parts of the drive train prematurely. Just curious.
That makes sense. Toyota has done a very good job of getting every bit of power out of the stock engine with changes to the engine control module program.
How about that supercharger? will it really require the use of high octane gasoline? With such a large increase in HP and torque will the Toyota A/T and differential handle the added stress? I have heard some folks have had to replace parts of the drive train prematurely. Just curious.
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SC
Well to answer your question it does require high octane. If you don't use the high octane you will develop a ping or rattle. This is a proven fact, everyone including myself at the dealership that run the SC all use premium.
As for the differential and the AT, I haven't had any problems at all with mine. TRD wouldn't manufacture something that would void the powertrain warranties on their vehicles. The SCs have their problems just like anything else however I love the peformance and think the cons really out weigh the pros.
Todd
As for the differential and the AT, I haven't had any problems at all with mine. TRD wouldn't manufacture something that would void the powertrain warranties on their vehicles. The SCs have their problems just like anything else however I love the peformance and think the cons really out weigh the pros.
Todd
#12
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TOR,
Thanks for responding. Did you really mean "the cons out weigh the pros" or did you mean this in the reverse? If this is what you meant what other cons are their?
Thanks for responding. Did you really mean "the cons out weigh the pros" or did you mean this in the reverse? If this is what you meant what other cons are their?
#14
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
83yotastockR
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
11
11-10-2015 06:54 AM
FS[MidAtl]: 2000 Tundra (Parting out) Pennsylvania
ToyotaMD
Vehicles - Parting Out
1
11-09-2015 11:53 AM
LCE_Performance
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
0
10-01-2015 01:03 PM
4runnerFireman
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
2
09-29-2015 06:24 AM