Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

WTF! I can't believe this!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-2004, 02:32 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
redvet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NE NJ
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WTF! I can't believe this!

Regarding the April 2004 Consumer Reports negative rating of the 2003
4Runner V6


Consumer Reports lists the 2003 V6 4Runner as a Used Car to Avoid. It
stated "the V 6 first year reliability has been poor. It showed below
average reliability in our latest survey."

I never thought I'd read anything like this about a Toyota from Consumer's Reports or anywhere.
:wtf:
Old 03-11-2004, 02:59 PM
  #2  
Contributing Member
 
HaveBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder if they are using the sulphur smell problem as the deciding factor.

I'd like to see a rating of the 2nd and 3rd gen 4Runners from a few years ago with the HG problems.
Old 03-11-2004, 03:05 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Churnd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 4,087
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Seeing their last report on off-road vehicles, I don't believe a thing Consumer Reports says anymore. I would rather hear it from an owner or an independent forum like this one anyday.
Old 03-11-2004, 03:46 PM
  #4  
Contributing Member
 
Tacoma Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They're still going to be an "authority figure" so the resale value may be affected.
Old 03-11-2004, 03:57 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
tom4416's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, there is the valve knock/tap that has affected a number of them, problems with the front pulley and recalls on the early builds and I can see where customer satisfaction might be low. Toyota buyers expect a lot from their vehicles and so may be less tolerant than some other buyers. In any case, it will probably impact the resale value in the short run but beyond that, I wouldn't worry too much about it. It's an awfully strong engine, easy to service, doesn't have the timing rubber timing belt and gets decent mileage for an SUV. Overall, even with the tapping noise, I'm still happy with the purchase, especially when I found out what it cost to replace the V8 should your timing belt let go after warranty - $10,000+!!!! Of course, I don't know (and don't want to know) the cost of the V6 since it's the only vehicle Toyota is using it in.
Old 03-11-2004, 03:59 PM
  #6  
Contributing Member
 
Paul H.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 7,454
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
I was surprized too, if you look at the V6 ratings there are 11 solid red circles and 3 half red circles. The half circles are for fuel,paint/trim/rust, andbody integrity. The V8 has only 1 half circle in body integrity. For those interested all previous years are recommended but seem to have problems with brakes and body integrity. Only the 96 has engine and suspension problems.
Old 03-11-2004, 04:01 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
lunatic14r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NEW JERSEY U.S.
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thats bull what C.R says i never belive that them
Old 03-11-2004, 06:15 PM
  #8  
Contributing Member
 
bulldog-yota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Morgan Hill, CA
Posts: 1,876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Most the reliability ratings is based on consumer studies and feedback, i.e. customers that complain about things. There has been a lot of complaints about the V6, which is fixed/getting fixed so it will work itself out in the next year.

Obviously the problem with ratings is that it is subjective, i.e. if you buy a Toyota your expectation is higher than when you buy a Ford for example.
Old 03-11-2004, 06:51 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
My99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fayetteville, AR
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
I doubt it will hurt resale much. Toyota has built and empire based on reliability. Hopefully the glitches will be fixed soon enough. I also don't worry about what consumer reports say about cars. The average consumer knows very little about the mechanics of their own vehicles and therefor I don't feel can give adequate feedback. I search online (edmunds) and judge for myself based on owner feedback that I can read.
Old 03-11-2004, 06:59 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Pawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tom4416
I found out what it cost to replace the V8 should your timing belt let go after warranty - $10,000+!!!! Of course, I don't know (and don't want to know) the cost of the V6 since it's the only vehicle Toyota is using it in.

Not sure about the 4.0, but the 3.4 is a non-interference motor. If the timing belt breaks, just replace it and go.
Old 03-11-2004, 09:02 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Mulkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vail, CO- originally from Charleston
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
First year design. I will never buy one, it doesn't matter who made it. It always takes a year. What was CR's take on the 04 V6. To new??
Old 03-11-2004, 09:45 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
EDGE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: outside NYC
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
They pretty much rate every house hold item the consumer will buy, have and use but still sometimes Im like :pat: whats with the Domestic being better then the German cars, duh their more expensive to fix as they get older and have problems from electrical stuff but they will never convince me that a Buick will be in better overall condition 5-10 years from now

I thought the Tundra had tons of problems when it came out and the 4.7L was new, same thing
Old 03-11-2004, 09:56 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Birdman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Auburn, CA
Posts: 487
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Pawk
Not sure about the 4.0, but the 3.4 is a non-interference motor. If the timing belt breaks, just replace it and go.
Is this true? I heard that if it breaks, it can cause sever damage to the engine. I have been stressing out about mine breaking cause I've got over 105,000mi on it. I keep trying to take it in but something always comes up.....
Old 03-11-2004, 10:08 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
amusement's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mulkey
First year design. I will never buy one, it doesn't matter who made it. It always takes a year. What was CR's take on the 04 V6. To new??
According to CR it's Toyota's history with the first year of a new V6 engine. History has shown that Toyota vehicles with V6 suffer from a greater than average faults.

CR still recommends the 2004 4runner with a V8
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Daenerysdad
Offroad Tech
2
10-01-2015 07:33 PM
Dakotaneu
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
4
08-15-2015 07:24 AM
adammtb
Items Wanted
6
07-27-2015 11:57 AM
Pawk
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
1
03-01-2004 11:21 PM



Quick Reply: WTF! I can't believe this!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:57 AM.