Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

Toytec vs. ss lifts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2008, 10:41 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
michalik_piotr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Toytec vs. ss lifts

Besides the price, opinions? Which is better and why? Trying to decide and maybe budget for one. Thanks
Old 04-09-2008, 04:18 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
emptypockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Spencer, Iowa
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Either is a good option, but the SS systems are specifically designed for trail performance. Avoid the Toytec coil spring spacer kits. Spacers just aren't a good long term solution. Their coil lift kits will be fine though.
Old 04-09-2008, 06:54 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
hross14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SS-It is a strainght forward kit and built very well. you will have no surprises when you put it in
Old 04-09-2008, 07:10 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
j-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Santa Monica, Ca
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i just put in the SS #1 kit with the cruiser coils and everything else he has for the rear in my 2000 4runner, and put some sway a way's 2.5" in the front along with some 285's and ill tell you what - its the nicest darn riding 4runner i have. Im going to switch the other 3's rear suspension to his - the ride is sooo smooth, yet tight - hard to explain but its hands down the best rear lift for any 4runner.
Old 04-09-2008, 10:58 AM
  #5  
Contributing Member
 
psraff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Kenai, Alaska
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm thinking my shocks and springs may be getting weak so I was researching the SS lifts... For the 1.2 it states: "At a bare minimum, if you have a stock rear bumper, you need to have at least a Class III trailer hitch installed with the complete stock rear bumper along with a set of functional rock sliders. "

Why do we "have" to have that? It's not a big deal, I have the hitch, and the bumper and the sliders are fairly cheap. But what's with the lift that need the hitch and the sliders? Or am I just misreading it?
Old 04-09-2008, 12:16 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
montana nate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by psraff
I'm thinking my shocks and springs may be getting weak so I was researching the SS lifts... For the 1.2 it states: "At a bare minimum, if you have a stock rear bumper, you need to have at least a Class III trailer hitch installed with the complete stock rear bumper along with a set of functional rock sliders. "

Why do we "have" to have that? It's not a big deal, I have the hitch, and the bumper and the sliders are fairly cheap. But what's with the lift that need the hitch and the sliders? Or am I just misreading it?
I think they could be talking about the weight, stiff springs without any weight on them are going to ride rough ...... they are designed to carry a certain loading
Old 04-09-2008, 01:04 PM
  #7  
Contributing Member
 
psraff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Kenai, Alaska
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by montana nate
I think they could be talking about the weight, stiff springs without any weight on them are going to ride rough ...... they are designed to carry a certain loading

Ahhh Good point. Makes sense. Thanks!
Old 04-09-2008, 05:09 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
emptypockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Spencer, Iowa
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The LC's are not stiff springs. The reason they call for the additional weight in the rear is to "tame" the amount of lift you'll get from them. Without the hitch and some extra weight in the rear, expect ~4.5" from the LC's. Mine have settled from 4.25" to about 3.75 now...and that's after a year of use and abuse.

You'll find that the LC's are one of the softest riding and best articulating springs you can put on your Runner. The OME's on the other hand are very stiff!
Old 04-09-2008, 07:24 PM
  #9  
Contributing Member
 
d0ubledown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: vansterdam BC.
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ome's are stiff. never ridden in an SS lift, but my friend had an '00 with the downey coilover kit with billies. it was quite plush...very nice ride....id say about as plush as stock with a touch firmer dampening to it..
Old 04-09-2008, 07:52 PM
  #10  
Contributing Member
 
Albuquerque Jim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The SS kits are tried and true. Steve is always upgrading components to refine his products to a superior level. You won't be disappointed.
Old 04-09-2008, 08:33 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
thmpr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My SS 7.2 just arrived and so stinking excited. Will do it this weekend!
Old 04-09-2008, 08:37 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
montana nate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmmmm, I still have the original OEM springs from my FZJ80, I was thinking they would give me more lift and stiffer then I wanted, but since they are already broken in, I may have to give them a shot ...... so if those are out back, whats a good pairing to them up front?
Old 04-09-2008, 08:51 PM
  #13  
Contributing Member
 
Albuquerque Jim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by montana nate
Hmmmmm, I still have the original OEM springs from my FZJ80, I was thinking they would give me more lift and stiffer then I wanted, but since they are already broken in, I may have to give them a shot ...... so if those are out back, whats a good pairing to them up front?
Careful, you have to use a certain coil, some years are way off.

www.sonoransteel.com
Old 04-09-2008, 08:55 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
montana nate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Albuquerque Jim
Careful, you have to use a certain coil, some years are way off.

www.sonoransteel.com
Do you know what year? Mine are off my 97' FZJ80, I have both the front and rear coils
Old 04-09-2008, 08:56 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Sloan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Alabama
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
does anybody know the difference between toytecs coils vs. the ome ones?
Old 04-09-2008, 09:07 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
rdang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll have to agree with j-man, I installed the SS 1.1 recently and the ride is much, much better than stock - that's with no extra weight from bumpers... and the flex is outrageous!
Old 04-10-2008, 07:54 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
hross14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Took at look at the Toy Tec lift--i wouldnt go that direction. Do it right the first time and be pleased instead of seeing me out there wheeling and asking you WHATS WRONG? No just kidding--but do it right and it wont regret it. I cant tell you how many times i purchased a cheaper this or that and ended going back for the more expensive this or that.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
suppra87
Tires & Wheels
9
07-15-2021 05:15 PM
1uzRunner
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
63
11-10-2018 03:58 PM
AkitaDog
Vehicles - Trailers (Complete)
0
09-03-2015 09:01 PM
matthew138
Newbie Tech Section
0
09-03-2015 08:21 AM
Ryall
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
2
09-02-2015 06:48 AM



Quick Reply: Toytec vs. ss lifts



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:56 AM.