Tacoma Gas Mileage
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tacoma Gas Mileage
Ok veterans, sorry if this is a repost, but I must ask the experienced: Is there something wrong with my truck??
I recently put a 2.5in suspension lift and 305/70/16 BFG AT's on my 97 Tacoma..... beforehand I was pretty much averaging 22-23mpg with 31x10.50 BFG AT's. Now I'm around 15mpg......at best....and this is with a 2.7L. Is this what is to be expected with 33's? Is there something wrong with my truck? Would re-gearing to 4.56's or 4.88's help? Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance!
I recently put a 2.5in suspension lift and 305/70/16 BFG AT's on my 97 Tacoma..... beforehand I was pretty much averaging 22-23mpg with 31x10.50 BFG AT's. Now I'm around 15mpg......at best....and this is with a 2.7L. Is this what is to be expected with 33's? Is there something wrong with my truck? Would re-gearing to 4.56's or 4.88's help? Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance!
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Santa Cruz
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would bet that regearing could bring your truck back to 18-20 MPG's. Also remember that your odometer is no longer accurate because of the increased tire size.
#5
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Would you guys agree that 12-15mpg is about right with a 2.7L with 305/70's though? I'm basically looking for reassurance that my truck isn't f**ed up. I just can't help but think that the 4cyl should do better than that, even with 33's.
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When calculating your fuel mileage are you recaluculating your odometer miles based in your tire size increase? If not your milage may not be as bad as you think.
Trending Topics
#8
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's a good point actually - I have not been taking tire size into account. I believe 33's throw off the speedo by about 10-12miles for every hundred - that sound about right?
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's a pain in the butt, but for your next tank, keep tabs of every trip to work, the store, your buddy's house, etc. on your truck's odometer, and then trace it on Google maps (which allows click & drag mapping). Calculate the per trip differential as a percentage, then do the same for the totals at the time of your next fill-up, just to make sure your tracking has been right. Like I said, I just did this last week and it gave me a better idea of how far off things are.
Last edited by jdsdj98; 02-12-2008 at 02:22 PM.
#10
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would think he should get better mileage with bigger wheels and tires because the engine turning slower at the same highway speed than it did with 15's. But the wheels and tires may be heavier, too.
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A LARGER than spec tire rolls a further distance with a single revolution (Π * diameter = circumference, or distance traveled). So, over the course of a mile, and subsequent miles, a LARGER than spec tire would have made fewer revolutions than a smaller tire to cover that same distance. Think now in terms of time, where for an hour of driving he traveled 60 actual miles. Since for one hour that wheel was making fewer revolutions than a normal sized wheel would, and since the speedometer/odometer are driven by driveshaft revolutions in the transfer case, the speedometer and odometer will reflect a slower speed and shorter distance traveled than is actually the case.
Conversely, a smaller tire/wheel yields the opposite result, showing a mileage and speed overage.
#12
The 2.7 can turn 35s decently, but depending on what type of driving you do for the majority, albeit, highway or city, a bigger tire would give you better mileage. That is if you stayed mainly on the highway. I would keep my stock gear ratio and apply 35s. You're fuel mileage will go up because it will actually make the final drive ratio higher, hence less RPMs.
#13
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I hear the point about lower engine speed on the highway, however, I rarely use fifth gear now - I have no power whatsoever in said gear at the lower RPM; therefore, I'm usually in fourth on the highway.... I'm also usually on the gas just to maintain speed. I find that it's easiest to maintain constant speed without being on the gas around 40-50 mph - that's what sprung my question about gears; my thinking being: if I'm having no trouble maintaining speed with very little throttle pressure at 40-50mph, if I were to switch to 4.56's or 4.88's, i'd hopefully be able to maintain 60-70mph at the same engine speed as I currently experience at 40-50.....without giving it half - to 2/3's throttle. This, in theory (in my crazy mind) might bring back my gas mileage. Does this make any sense?
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Funny noone has said anything about rolling resistance or moment of inertia. A taller and wider tire has more rotating mass that is further from the center, requiring more power to turn it. True, a bigger tire will reduce your engine rpms at highway speed, but it takes more power to move them so you will be using more gas at lower rpms than you would at a higher, lower load rpm.
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Delanowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Like 4 rocker said, teh supposed benefits or the alrger diameter are offset by the increased weight and loss of leverage teh smaller tires applied. It takes more force to get teh larger tires rolling, and unless regeared requires more force to keep it rolling. Think of it this way hold out a stick with a 10 pound weight on it. Not add a couple inches to the stick and see if it is easier or harder to hold out. You axle is you and the tire is the stick it applying force to.
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if you put your lift and tires on recently, then you are experiancing winter gas +lift and tires like me. i was getting 20-22 mpg hwy w/a 3.4, and now i'm at about 15-16 hwy//11-13 mpg city. this is with 255/85/16 BFG's (33's), i'm gonna regear to 4.56 to help w/ towing, but i'll be going back to a smaller a/t tire.
#17
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Funny noone has said anything about rolling resistance or moment of inertia. A taller and wider tire has more rotating mass that is further from the center, requiring more power to turn it. True, a bigger tire will reduce your engine rpms at highway speed, but it takes more power to move them so you will be using more gas at lower rpms than you would at a higher, lower load rpm.
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If your truck came stock with 28" tires and a manual transmission, the 4.56 should correct your gearing for 31" tires. As to weather or not it will restore fuel economy, it should restore some, but I dont have any experience to know how much. Hopefully it will get pretty close as I think this summer I might try to track down some 4.56 diffs for my truck too.
#19
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
uh-oh now it looks like i've had some conflicting information - I was always under that impression that I have 4.11's stock - yes, my truck is the "LX" so stock it had steelies and, yes, I believe `28's, and a 5speed. With the 31's my speedo was off by about 4-5mph at 60mph.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tacoma1313
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
2
08-17-2015 05:44 PM