Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

Switched to 32s: Fuel Economy / MPG observations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-09-2006, 05:46 AM
  #1  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
GodwinAustin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: JACKSON
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Switched to 32s: Fuel Economy / MPG observations

With the 32s (up from 31s) I have lost about 3 MPGs or so. Previosuly I got between 300 and 315 per 16 gallon tank. Now I am getting about 250 miles per tank.
About 18-19 mpg previously - now I am averaging around 16MPG.


Definetly a pretty big MPG loss, but what can a Yotatecher do?


Old 01-09-2006, 05:57 AM
  #2  
Banned
 
Localmotion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
man...id be dammned if i can get 250+ out of mine!

I have a 3.4 4runner.

now im looking at 220 with 285s

oh well...gotta pay to play

before i was getting aroud 230..LOL
Old 01-09-2006, 05:59 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
jacksonpt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how aggressive was the tread on your 31s? and on the new 32s? Also - are you taking into consideration that your odo is probably off due to the larger diameter tires?

I found that I lost very little MPG going from 29" ATs to 32" ATs, but I lost a lot going from 32" ATs to 33" MTs.
Old 01-09-2006, 06:02 AM
  #4  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
GodwinAustin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: JACKSON
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jacksonpt
how aggressive was the tread on your 31s? and on the new 32s? Also - are you taking into consideration that your odo is probably off due to the larger diameter tires?

I found that I lost very little MPG going from 29" ATs to 32" ATs, but I lost a lot going from 32" ATs to 33" MTs.
huh - I didnt think about the odometer - what difference does it make? How can I compensate for the different diameter? If my odo reads 250, is it more or less distance that I have actually travelled with the bigger tires

also - I went from 31" Wrangler RSA(light highway tread) to 32" Dunlop Mud Rovers. So that is probably one of the big reasons I have seen a drop.
Old 01-09-2006, 06:04 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
jacksonpt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes, your tread will make a difference. The odo will be off (read lower than actual), but since you went from 31s to 32s, the differences should be rather insignificant. There are calculators on-line (check out off-road.com) that will tell you what your odo/speedo are reading compared to the actual mileage/speed... but I don't have any of them bookmarked at the moment.
Old 01-09-2006, 06:10 AM
  #6  
tc
Contributing Member
 
tc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Longmont, CO
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I went from AT31x10.50's to AT33x10.50's and didn't notice much of a drop.

I checked my speedo after against GPS - GPS says 71, speedo says 70. Not enough different to worry about. I wouldn't waste my time with the calculator, because that assumes the stock speedo was correct, and in my case it wasn't.

My guess it's more to do with the tread pattern/compound and weight of the tires, possibly the width too.
Old 01-09-2006, 06:13 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
kpooch75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The odometer will be low by about 3%. Not really a huge difference, in your case probably around 8 miles per tank. Assuming you have a true 31 and 32 inch diameter tire:
31" x PI = 97.495 (Rolling Circumference)
32" x PI = 100.64
Old 01-09-2006, 06:37 AM
  #8  
Contributing Member
 
ebelen1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Socal
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kpooch75
The odometer will be low by about 3%. Not really a huge difference, in your case probably around 8 miles per tank. Assuming you have a true 31 and 32 inch diameter tire:
31" x PI = 97.495 (Rolling Circumference)
32" x PI = 100.64
This speedo calc is spot on if your truck came with 31's as stockers. If not, you need to start w/ the stock tire size and then calculate the new tire size to find out approximately how off your speedo is.
Old 01-09-2006, 06:54 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
JHupp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I went up from 265/70s to 265/75s on 16 inch rims, which is close to your size. I notice a slight drop in the gas ileage, but I ride the same route to work every day for 5 days a week, and I notice the gas guage always went from full to 1/4 of a tank in those 5 days, and it still does, so I really don't think I suffered any noticeable loss. As for 280 miles out of a tank, Im doing 180-200 with the wind behind me. (NJ driving is nasty though)
Old 01-09-2006, 03:33 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
montypower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's my gas mileage progression... All mixed hwy/city driving

Stock: 20-21 mpg
Lift & 32" Tires: 18 mpg
SCr: 17 mpg
SCr & Winter Gas: 15 mpg
Old 01-09-2006, 03:40 PM
  #11  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
GodwinAustin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: JACKSON
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah - the winter gas is a bummer.
Old 01-09-2006, 06:50 PM
  #12  
Contributing Member
iTrader: (3)
 
dragr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Auburn, AL
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by GodwinAustin
With the 32s (up from 31s) I have lost about 3 MPGs or so. Previosuly I got between 300 and 315 per 16 gallon tank. Now I am getting about 250 miles per tank.
About 18-19 mpg previously - now I am averaging around 16MPG.


Definetly a pretty big MPG loss, but what can a Yotatecher do?



Wow, I only wish I got that good!
Old 01-09-2006, 06:53 PM
  #13  
Banned
 
garrett1478's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dragr1
Wow, I only wish I got that good!
you're telling me....thats about what i get with 265/75s
Old 01-14-2006, 10:45 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Runner003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hendersonville TN
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a 99 3.4 4x4 just stock with 265 75 16's Hwy Best so far is 300 on a tank driving 75-90 miles an hour,average is 285, Street no hwy 200 miles per tank. IF I broke it down it, I would cry so I won't.. Still worth every cent for gas! I have some over priced street "AT's" Looking forward to some BFG's KO AT's!!!!
Old 01-16-2006, 08:29 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Jeebs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im running a stock 01' 4Runner, and get 20.x MPG regularly. I guess I drive with a light foot??? I do primarily drive highway, but even around the town driving, it still gets around the 20.x MPG.
Old 01-16-2006, 08:42 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
dfoxengr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
your speedometer and odometer are actually reading lower, so your calculations are off.

i got my truck calibrated, and check with my gps. at 70 (speedo) gps says 75 or so.
went from 31->32"

Last edited by dfoxengr; 01-16-2006 at 08:44 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gary4runner
Newbie Tech Section
3
09-24-2015 12:53 AM
TDonkey
93-98 T100s
0
07-26-2015 10:14 AM
HookahRoo
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
4
07-20-2015 07:06 PM
rbh261
2010+ 4Runner
0
07-13-2015 12:04 PM
Tyler Cunningham
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
3
07-11-2015 10:18 AM



Quick Reply: Switched to 32s: Fuel Economy / MPG observations



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:13 AM.