Supercharger at 7500ft- leaner than sea level?
#1
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
Supercharger at 7500ft- leaner than sea level?
Ok I've been reading a lot about supercharged 3rd gens because I am going to be buying one to combat the lack of air where I live, but I haven't found the exact answer I have been searching for (have read about 30 supercharger related threads).
So, here it goes:
You put a supercharger on the 3.4, and the fuel mixture will tend to lean out, that's obvious. The more air you have, the more fuel your system has to add to the cylinder. If the stock fuel system can't keep up, you can get a dangerously lean mixture, and you get ping, possibly engine death if driven like that for too long.
The air is MUCH thinner at 7500 ft than at sea level, obviously. So, that would mean that going up in altitude will RICHEN the mixture because there is less air available. Is this correct? I have read that some people experience no ping at lower altitudes, yet when they drive through CO for example they will tend to get ping? Is this what happens, or did I miss something? Is the high-altitude ping due to fuel starvation, or is it something else?
Basically, I'm trying to figure out if I should add a URD kit to my new car budget, or if it can be put off some as long as the SC'd 4Runner doesn't have ping problems at lower altitudes.
Thanks for your help
So, here it goes:
You put a supercharger on the 3.4, and the fuel mixture will tend to lean out, that's obvious. The more air you have, the more fuel your system has to add to the cylinder. If the stock fuel system can't keep up, you can get a dangerously lean mixture, and you get ping, possibly engine death if driven like that for too long.
The air is MUCH thinner at 7500 ft than at sea level, obviously. So, that would mean that going up in altitude will RICHEN the mixture because there is less air available. Is this correct? I have read that some people experience no ping at lower altitudes, yet when they drive through CO for example they will tend to get ping? Is this what happens, or did I miss something? Is the high-altitude ping due to fuel starvation, or is it something else?
Basically, I'm trying to figure out if I should add a URD kit to my new car budget, or if it can be put off some as long as the SC'd 4Runner doesn't have ping problems at lower altitudes.
Thanks for your help
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ontario, southern CA
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You put a supercharger on the 3.4, and the fuel mixture will tend to lean out, that's obvious.
So, that would mean that going up in altitude will RICHEN the mixture because there is less air available.
Generally speaking, properly tuned forced induction cars are less affected by altitude than naturally aspirated cars.
Last edited by Mikestang; 07-13-2006 at 07:35 AM.
#3
Contributing Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Littleton,CO
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When I ran my Eclipse up heree i was able to push the stock fuel pump and injectors a little more at 6000ft asl than at sea level and some do run SCs at this altitude with no issues but a fuel upgrade kit should still be installed at some point.
#5
Remember, much of the issue with the 5VZ is timing. The timing is just too advanced in certain areas of the map for forced induction, thus you get HG/LR ping even at altitude (although it's to a lesser degree). When I was at the beginning stages of my tuning debacle, I would drive up to Flagstaff (which is 8000ft or something) and I would still get ping going up "the hill" until I got to 7000ft or so. Keep in mind, at that time I was running about 8 degrees of retarded timing and all the other mods in my sig. That told me a couple things: 1. I didn't have enough timing retarded in certain areas of the map. 2. Stock injectors are a serious problem, even with all the other mods. So, until I get my 305 injectors from Mark, I have the timing cranked way down (-10) in a lot of places of the timing matrix.
People are simply "playing with fire" by running the SC'r with no fuel/timing mods. EGT's will sky rocket, then drop suddenly, as will power with the stock fuel pump at WOT for sustained periods of time. I don't know about you, but the last thing I want to have to deal with is passing a big rig fully loaded with camping gear and family in the mountains and having the engine power drop suddenly.
People are simply "playing with fire" by running the SC'r with no fuel/timing mods. EGT's will sky rocket, then drop suddenly, as will power with the stock fuel pump at WOT for sustained periods of time. I don't know about you, but the last thing I want to have to deal with is passing a big rig fully loaded with camping gear and family in the mountains and having the engine power drop suddenly.
Last edited by rimpainter.com; 07-13-2006 at 08:24 AM.
#7
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
Yup, I'll be getting the URD kit because it's relatively cheap insurance against major engine failure, and I'm not interested in suddenly losing power at speed, as 96Runner mentioned.
Thanks for the timing explanation.
Thanks for the timing explanation.
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LCE_Performance
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
0
10-01-2015 01:03 PM
charlie_fong
General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related)
0
09-27-2015 10:06 PM
anniesball
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
10
09-15-2015 05:41 PM
anniesball
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
3
09-09-2015 09:55 AM