Supercharged V8 4Runner article...
04-26-2005, 05:44 PM
#1
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
Supercharged V8 4Runner article...
Last edited by Jason B; 04-26-2005 at 05:47 PM.
04-26-2005, 05:54 PM
#4
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I did, thank you. It looks like no TJM for me thanks to this 97 I am attempting to sell. I thought it would sell right away for a good price, but the mileage thing is scaring people away, thus I keep dropping the price. I will let you know if anything changes. Thanks man.
Trending Topics
04-27-2005, 08:46 PM
#8
Contributing Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: WA ,monroe
Posts: 1,871
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by <96 Runner>
Check out the times for the Nissan Armada at 305HP. Some mags have noted high 15's in the 1/4. 
How much does that thing weigh?
How much does that thing weigh?
but that motor makes 385 ft .lb
http://www.autobytel.com/content/res...andardFeatures
I thought I seen somewhere that the 4.7 made 275 hp NA
04-27-2005, 09:28 PM
#11
Guest
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North Pole
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Priced at $48,336 we'd take the 353hp 4Runner over the Cayenne any day, just as it took the quarter-mile crown from Porsche's bullet-fast Cayenne S. That's right, Four Wheeler has a new winner in the fastest-accelerating-4x4 sweepstakes.
The Cayenne is also available in a twin turbo V8 trim with a low 14 second 1/4 mile.
04-27-2005, 11:05 PM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Read his numbers on his CarDomain page:
Bragging Rights
Quarter Mile: 14.6 s @ 94 mph
0-60: 6.3 s
Est. Horsepower: 300
Weight: 4400
Then look at his poll:
my poll
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Question: HOW MUCH "WHEEL" HORSEPOWER SHOULD AN AWD SUPERCHARGED 4RUNNER PUT DOWN?
a. 260-280 WHP
b. 250-260 WHP
c. 240-250 WHP
d. 300+ WHP
e. 228.3 WHP (ACTUALLY PUT DOWN THIS) SUX SERIOUS A$$!
f. SUE THE SH!@ OUT OF TRD????
Bragging Rights
Quarter Mile: 14.6 s @ 94 mph
0-60: 6.3 s
Est. Horsepower: 300
Weight: 4400
Then look at his poll:
my poll
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Question: HOW MUCH "WHEEL" HORSEPOWER SHOULD AN AWD SUPERCHARGED 4RUNNER PUT DOWN?
a. 260-280 WHP
b. 250-260 WHP
c. 240-250 WHP
d. 300+ WHP
e. 228.3 WHP (ACTUALLY PUT DOWN THIS) SUX SERIOUS A$$!
f. SUE THE SH!@ OUT OF TRD????
Last edited by AUJWE; 04-27-2005 at 11:08 PM.
04-28-2005, 07:45 AM
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Price as tested $48,336. Holy crap! I paid $30K for my '04 V8 SE. I hope they got some real good bells and whistles for that extra $18K, which, will probably work out to more like $25K with 5 years of interest payments added on!
04-28-2005, 07:50 AM
#15
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 4,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RBLACAUSA
Price as tested $48,336. Holy crap! I paid $30K for my '04 V8 SE. I hope they got some real good bells and whistles for that extra $18K, which, will probably work out to more like $25K with 5 years of interest payments added on!
04-28-2005, 08:07 AM
#17
Originally Posted by Silver_Truck
Good point....isn't the cayenne turbo the fastest SUV made? VW made some special Toureg for Europe only and it was still slower.
the ML55 has a 0-60 of 6.4 and the X5... well read for yourself...
Originally Posted by edmunds.com road test
...the new X5 is called the 4.6is and, according to BMW, its 4.6-liter V8 boasts 347 horsepower at 6,500 rpm and 354 ft-lbs. of torque at 3,700 rpm (compared with 342 horses at 5,500 rpm and 376 ft-lbs. as low as 2,800 rpm for the ML55)...
...BMW claims the 4.6 will accelerate to 60 mph from a standstill in less than 6.5 seconds. In comparison, Mercedes claims a 6.4-second time for the ML55 to reach that speed. So straight-line performance between the two is a wash. BMW, however, says that the X5 4.6is "will exceed 149 mph" while the ML55 tops out at 144 mph...
...BMW claims the 4.6 will accelerate to 60 mph from a standstill in less than 6.5 seconds. In comparison, Mercedes claims a 6.4-second time for the ML55 to reach that speed. So straight-line performance between the two is a wash. BMW, however, says that the X5 4.6is "will exceed 149 mph" while the ML55 tops out at 144 mph...
Originally Posted by edmunds.com
Performance:
Acceleration (0-60 mph): 5.88 sec.
Braking Distance (60-0 mph): 116.34 ft.
Base Number of Cylinders: 8
Base Engine Size: 4.5 liters
Base Engine Type: V8
Horsepower: 450 hp
Max Horsepower: 6000 rpm
Torque: 457 ft-lbs.
Max Torque: 2250 rpm
Maximum Payload: 1598 lbs.
Maximum Towing Capacity: 7716 lbs.
Drive Type: AWD
USED Market Value: $78,649
Acceleration (0-60 mph): 5.88 sec.
Braking Distance (60-0 mph): 116.34 ft.
Base Number of Cylinders: 8
Base Engine Size: 4.5 liters
Base Engine Type: V8
Horsepower: 450 hp
Max Horsepower: 6000 rpm
Torque: 457 ft-lbs.
Max Torque: 2250 rpm
Maximum Payload: 1598 lbs.
Maximum Towing Capacity: 7716 lbs.
Drive Type: AWD
USED Market Value: $78,649
Last edited by bamachem; 04-28-2005 at 08:12 AM.
04-28-2005, 08:09 AM
#18
Contributing Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: boston, ma
Posts: 6,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i really still dont get why people care about acceleration and top speed in an suv.
beyond adding an s/c to a 3rd gen or something, i dont see why you need so much boost as to get to 60 in under 7 seconds.
id love to have a few more horses if only to make the truck perform better on the highway.. but im not looking to drag race it or enter a top speed contest.
beyond adding an s/c to a 3rd gen or something, i dont see why you need so much boost as to get to 60 in under 7 seconds.
id love to have a few more horses if only to make the truck perform better on the highway.. but im not looking to drag race it or enter a top speed contest.
Last edited by lee; 04-28-2005 at 08:11 AM.
04-28-2005, 08:17 AM
#19
Contributing Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 4,690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bamachem
and the cayenne turbo...
I'm not much of a speed buff when it comes to SUV's but I gotta say it's pretty cool to just tap on the skinny pedal and feel it just move instantly
04-28-2005, 08:25 AM
#20
Contributing Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: boston, ma
Posts: 6,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i drove my dad's friends cayenne (not S or Turbo, just regular), and its a very smooth, quick suv.
i noticed it corners well and feels quite sturdy, not to mention it drives more like sport sedan.
but really given the room inside and the characteristics, id rather own a 5-series. yes, the cayenne has more room, but not enough to be THAT useful to anyone buying one.
call me crazy, but id rather have a vehicle's body style do what its supposed to rather than having it be overloaded.. ie, a sports car or sport sedan for speed, an suv for utility and offroading.
i noticed it corners well and feels quite sturdy, not to mention it drives more like sport sedan.
but really given the room inside and the characteristics, id rather own a 5-series. yes, the cayenne has more room, but not enough to be THAT useful to anyone buying one.
call me crazy, but id rather have a vehicle's body style do what its supposed to rather than having it be overloaded.. ie, a sports car or sport sedan for speed, an suv for utility and offroading.
