Pretty Good 4Runner History...
03-05-2003, 10:00 AM
#1
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03-05-2003, 10:50 AM
#3
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Available in two- or four-wheel drive, in base, SR5 and Limited trim, and with two engine choices, there was a 4Runner for everyone. Engine choices were a 2.7-liter four-cylinder or a 3.4-liter V6, both twin cam, multi-valve designs."
Whoops. Anyone know what's wrong with this?
Whoops. Anyone know what's wrong with this?
03-05-2003, 10:57 AM
#4
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by <96 Runner>
"Available in two- or four-wheel drive, in base, SR5 and Limited trim, and with two engine choices, there was a 4Runner for everyone. Engine choices were a 2.7-liter four-cylinder or a 3.4-liter V6, both twin cam, multi-valve designs."
Whoops. Anyone know what's wrong with this?
"Available in two- or four-wheel drive, in base, SR5 and Limited trim, and with two engine choices, there was a 4Runner for everyone. Engine choices were a 2.7-liter four-cylinder or a 3.4-liter V6, both twin cam, multi-valve designs."
Whoops. Anyone know what's wrong with this?
I can't believe J.D. Power called it a Compact SUV. After driving my Escort for a week or two, the 4Runner feels like a bus.
03-05-2003, 11:20 AM
#5
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by <96 Runner>
"Available in two- or four-wheel drive, in base, SR5 and Limited trim, and with two engine choices, there was a 4Runner for everyone. Engine choices were a 2.7-liter four-cylinder or a 3.4-liter V6, both twin cam, multi-valve designs."
Whoops. Anyone know what's wrong with this?
"Available in two- or four-wheel drive, in base, SR5 and Limited trim, and with two engine choices, there was a 4Runner for everyone. Engine choices were a 2.7-liter four-cylinder or a 3.4-liter V6, both twin cam, multi-valve designs."
Whoops. Anyone know what's wrong with this?
or- maybe they left out the 2.4L 4-cyl engine choice. Mine didn't come with "trim." I had to meet and marry a girl from college for that.
Last edited by keisur; 03-05-2003 at 11:23 AM.
03-05-2003, 11:39 AM
#7
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by <96 Runner>
No one's got it yet...
No one's got it yet...
I would imagine the 4cyl isn't a DOHC or "twin cam."
Trending Topics
03-05-2003, 05:34 PM
#13
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 4 runner history
Originally posted by toyota parts dude
they don't put 4 cylinders in 4 runners amymore. they quit doing that around 94 wasn't it?
they don't put 4 cylinders in 4 runners amymore. they quit doing that around 94 wasn't it?
03-05-2003, 05:38 PM
#14
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: elizabethtown PA
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
auto hubs
they were wrong about all the 1st gen 4 runners having manual hubs also. they automatic hubs even on the 85 solid axle 4 runners. they started the stupid auto hubs in 84.
03-05-2003, 05:50 PM
#15
Contributing Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by <96 Runner>
"Available in two- or four-wheel drive, in base, SR5 and Limited trim, and with two engine choices, there was a 4Runner for everyone. Engine choices were a 2.7-liter four-cylinder or a 3.4-liter V6, both twin cam, multi-valve designs."
Whoops. Anyone know what's wrong with this?
"Available in two- or four-wheel drive, in base, SR5 and Limited trim, and with two engine choices, there was a 4Runner for everyone. Engine choices were a 2.7-liter four-cylinder or a 3.4-liter V6, both twin cam, multi-valve designs."
Whoops. Anyone know what's wrong with this?
Or, I spotted something else. They left out the Sport and Highlander (was that what it was?) models.
Well, that's my guess. Have fun all.
DH6twinotter
03-06-2003, 04:31 AM
#16
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You guys REALLY tore that thing apart. I just thought it was interesting that the article said twin cam 3.4, when the engine advertises "four cam" in big letters when you open the hood.
I honestly dont know about the 4-banger.
Good job!
I honestly dont know about the 4-banger.
Good job!
03-06-2003, 05:03 AM
#18
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by keisur
96 runner,
I can't get your "$8 mud flaps" link to work. monty pics wants an email and password to access your photo album.
96 runner,
I can't get your "$8 mud flaps" link to work. monty pics wants an email and password to access your photo album.
03-06-2003, 05:50 AM
#20
96, you have your Montypics linked to your signup screen.
Can't do that with Monty, as you don't get the full Monty with them
You can only link to one Monty item at a time, and it must end with jpg.
They don't offer viewers to browse your pics you have uploaded like album hosts do.
Can't do that with Monty, as you don't get the full Monty with them
You can only link to one Monty item at a time, and it must end with jpg.
They don't offer viewers to browse your pics you have uploaded like album hosts do.
